Quote:
Originally Posted by Z06Fanatic1
your goal should be to achieve the highest ROI with the least variance.....that means reducing number of tables, cutting out most turbos, game selecting across multiple sites, reducing avg field size,etc.....I also wouldn't mix in big variations in ABI - if your ABI is 109 don't be playing 1ks and 10 dollar tournaments - reduce the variance......the Sunday Million is a prime example of a tournament almost every pro plays but few really should be playing it.....converting EV to $$ through that tournament is extremely tough yet everyone plays it every week because they can't pass that edge up.....imagine there was a 215 on Pokerstars everyday that was a long term 100% ROI tournament but it had 50,000 entrants - 90-95% of pros would be losers in that tournament over the course of a year!
Bottom line is focus on converting EV to cash not just making EV in the safest way possible....your wallet will thank you in the end.
Smart points, and agree on all of it.
But where do you believe the line goes? F.e. cutting to 12tabling, do you think we will make moore money per hour of adding 1,2,3,4 tours? How much of ev will that take from already existing mtts? All these kinds of add ups are hard to count on.
If we play with mtt tournament variance calculator, there is good estimations we can do, but still some x,y missing there aswell.