Quote:
Originally Posted by NiSash1337
I personally dislike the packages that are advertised as great investment but are in reality just -ev. Oftentimes they are backedup by inflated sharkscopegraphs. Once you filter out Rebuys or adjust the Rebuyfactor you realize that your Heroes in the MP are really not Heroes and are barely winningplayers.
Do you think rebuys skew the graphs by that much?
I was curious about this and looked up my stats for 2013 on SS and I've played a lot more rebuys than the average MTT grinder as there's a lot of sats and 3r 180s in there.
It's about 3k rebuys out of a total 8k games and the profit deviation was 8% compared to my PT3 numbers which are accurate. I get that this gets inflated more the higher your rebuy-freezeout ratio is/if you spazz really hard in the rebuy period but I don't think the majority of regs do that? Idk.
And I reckon that the higher the buyin Sharkscope should get more accurate than in let's say a random 5r as regs make up a good portion of the playing field (at least for stuff like the late cubes where it's basically all regs) or is that flawed thinking?