Quote:
Originally Posted by Ansky
The poker sites can easily have ulterior motives in investigating any cheating mess. Not saying in this particular case, but in the case of AB/UB, they clearly would not have uncovered the cheating on their own (or would have and would have brushed it under the rug as they tried to do). In the case of multiaccounting, without pressure from the community, there would be little motivation to crack down from the sites.
. . .
|
Yes! The recent Chinese collusion case is a great example of how 2+2 discussion helps the community. There is no fckn way PokerStars would have parted with $2million had the regs not stood up for themselves to get some compensation for having been cheated for months.
Two Plus Two
Linear Mode
