|
|
| Puzzles and Other Games Discussions about Puzzles and other non-gambling games |
05-18-2012, 07:54 PM
|
#1921
|
|
grinder
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 436
|
Re: Triplechain
Alright, I went ahead and set up a home game. Whenever we get critical mass and all have a couple hours free we can schedule a game. Everyone's welcome of course, feel free to invite your friends.
- If you don't already have it, download the free PokerStars software
from http://www.pokerstars.com/poker/download/
- Open the main poker lobby, then click on the Home Games tab
- Click the 'Join a Poker Club' button
- Enter my Club ID number: 640572
- Enter my Invitation Code: nothreesplease
|
|
|
05-19-2012, 04:41 AM
|
#1922
|
|
Power Ranger
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Charicific Valley
Posts: 46,125
|
Re: Triplechain
Quote:
Originally Posted by zac777
Alright, I went ahead and set up a home game. Whenever we get critical mass and all have a couple hours free we can schedule a game. Everyone's welcome of course, feel free to invite your friends.
- If you don't already have it, download the free PokerStars software
from http://www.pokerstars.com/poker/download/
- Open the main poker lobby, then click on the Home Games tab
- Click the 'Join a Poker Club' button
- Enter my Club ID number: 640572
- Enter my Invitation Code: nothreesplease
|
I applied
|
|
|
05-19-2012, 09:17 AM
|
#1923
|
|
grinder
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 436
|
Re: Triplechain
Quote:
Originally Posted by derwipok
I applied 
|
Just approved you and donk4. If any of you are interested in organizing, let me know and i'll make you an admin.
|
|
|
05-21-2012, 05:51 AM
|
#1924
|
|
old hand
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,993
|
Re: Triplechain
God, last rack mistake yesterday, cost me about 0.431 rating points.
|
|
|
05-21-2012, 10:58 AM
|
#1925
|
|
journeyman
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 332
|
Re: Triplechain
What are people's thoughts on my play in Round 7 yesterday? Basically there are three fairly decent plays, each of which has a losing combo:
6 top of centre zone and 2 in bottom zone;
6 bottom of centre zone and 2 in bottom zone
6 bottom zone and 2 bottom of centre zone.
I didn't actually see option 3 at the time, but think now that this is probably/definitely best. I actually played option 1 because I thought 2s were more valuable than 5s, blocking 5s and causing me to give up a win. Grim, I actually thought about this for a minute or two, and still didn't see option 3. I think I initially dismissed it as it loses with no 2 in Round 8 and a 2 in Round 9, but have since realised the other options lose with one 2 in Round 8 and none in Round 9!
|
|
|
05-21-2012, 11:06 AM
|
#1926
|
|
Malware Jedi
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In front of my monitor
Posts: 12,635
|
Re: Triplechain
If I keep up like this I´m going to lose my daily expert status.
|
|
|
05-21-2012, 11:20 AM
|
#1927
|
|
Power Ranger
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Charicific Valley
Posts: 46,125
|
Re: Triplechain
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul101
What are people's thoughts on my play in Round 7 yesterday? Basically there are three fairly decent plays, each of which has a losing combo:
6 top of centre zone and 2 in bottom zone;
6 bottom of centre zone and 2 in bottom zone
6 bottom zone and 2 bottom of centre zone.
I didn't actually see option 3 at the time, but think now that this is probably/definitely best. I actually played option 1 because I thought 2s were more valuable than 5s, blocking 5s and causing me to give up a win. Grim, I actually thought about this for a minute or two, and still didn't see option 3. I think I initially dismissed it as it loses with no 2 in Round 8 and a 2 in Round 9, but have since realised the other options lose with one 2 in Round 8 and none in Round 9! 
|
I would have chosen option 2, but 1/2 seem fairly equal since any superiority depends on getting two 2s or 5s in the next rack. I don't like option 3 since it leaves you with a stranded 2 if you don't get a 2 in the next rack.
|
|
|
05-21-2012, 11:30 AM
|
#1928
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: without squirrel
Posts: 31,575
|
Re: Triplechain
i like #2, chiefly because #1 gives up on a 5, whereas there's still some chance of #2 being connecting all bar the one 4 in the rhs, given a perfect roll.
|
|
|
05-21-2012, 11:36 AM
|
#1929
|
|
Power Ranger
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Charicific Valley
Posts: 46,125
|
Re: Triplechain
Quote:
Originally Posted by kokiri
i like #2, chiefly because #1 gives up on a 5, whereas there's still some chance of #2 being connecting all bar the one 4 in the rhs, given a perfect roll.
|
I don't get this, #1 would actually give you a chance to snake 4s if you get three in the next rack and one in the last.
|
|
|
05-21-2012, 11:40 AM
|
#1930
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: without squirrel
Posts: 31,575
|
Re: Triplechain
ok, rephrase: i think there are more scenarios in which #2 is 'perfect' (close to perfect) than #1 - essentially #2 you need to roll twox5 vs threex4 plus another one.
|
|
|
05-21-2012, 02:08 PM
|
#1931
|
|
2010 PSOP Champion
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Check out my gang listing
Posts: 19,929
|
Re: Triplechain
Wow can't believe I won yesterday. When I was playing I was getting angry at myself for playing bad and was sure I'd be bottom 10.
|
|
|
05-22-2012, 04:25 AM
|
#1932
|
|
old hand
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,993
|
Re: Triplechain
Quote:
Originally Posted by ibavly
Wow can't believe I won yesterday.
|
QFT. 40 DCs without a win between this win and the last one.  During those 40 games ran almost 4 wins below expected last rack wins, so it wasn't only about playing poorly. Also compared some quick estimation %s with actually calculated %s, and based on the small sample size (ten-ish) it seems like the quick odds estimations might be just slighty lower than the actual percentages on average, but the difference was total just 3 percentage points more for the exact calculations in all of the games combined, with a simple game never being more than 3 (rounded) percentage points different. So the average seems so close that without further evidence to point otherwise I'm going to assume the quick estimations are just about right over the long term even though single estimations might not be that accurate.
|
|
|
05-23-2012, 04:53 PM
|
#1933
|
|
old hand
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,993
|
Re: Triplechain
Quote:
Originally Posted by TH10
If anyone cares, based on DC stats and the rating calculator it would seem that the average player in DCs has a rating of about 1378, which is lower than I would've expected.
|
Nobody probably cares, but this is actually wrong. 1378 would be the average rating of the players I have played against, since the number is based on my results. So including my rating, the average for all players playing DCs is around 1382.
Started yesterday from 1499, finished 5/27, which means my rating is at least 1499.67 after yesterday, should be even higher, since I'm pretty sure I got to 1499 before everyone had played the day before, so I'm guessing it is now at around 1499.8. Which makes the last rack mistake a few days ago really costly, would be Master now without that.  To makes things worse I seem to have lost the ability to play even a single game well.
|
|
|
05-24-2012, 04:19 AM
|
#1934
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: without squirrel
Posts: 31,575
|
Re: Triplechain
drought broken. Phew.
I thought it was a classic snipable DC yesterday, too.
|
|
|
05-24-2012, 06:53 AM
|
#1935
|
|
Nixonian
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Young Nixon says Spurs sweep
Posts: 57,998
|
Re: Triplechain
It's not letting me play my advanced, bug won't let me start new games or undo. My advanced is therapeutic. I need my advanced.
And thanks for letting me know how below average I was at DC's. I should have quit sooner. Y'all are just mean.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:28 AM.
|