I look forward to the head explosions that will commence once Mueller finds no criminal wrongdoing on Trump's part.

Oh, and two months earlier in New Hampshire

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2017/3...n-child-brides

1. Quote the post or
2. Apologize and retract.

But Clinton lied about getting a bj, so ....

If the Left insists on trying to make a martyr of Trump in terms of this witch-hunt, it will succeed only in:

1. failing to prove criminal wrongdoing on his part and
2. making him even more sympathetic as we head into the mid-terms, for which the map looks bad for Democrats in the House and even worse for Democrats in the Senate (not to mention the effect on 2020).

I don't care what he lied about, and neither should you.

You had a poor teacher then.

The first lesson you should have learned is who has the burden and the presumption of innocence.

And don't use "litigation" to conflate criminal with civil.

Did you hear about the terminally ill cancer patient who wanted to hear the roar of Harleys before he died? Get the tissue box. Feel good story of the day. No link. Go find it.

You stated "It has become clear there is no evidence for this." What is the evidence that there is no evidence of obstruction of justice?

No, I do understand that you think Americans are worth more than anyone else.

He can direct the AAG to fire him and then fire the AAG if he won't. It's what Nixon did.

Mr Christie has clearly forgotten that the US is not a theocracy.

Not all conflation is improper. Both criminal and civil law are carried out via litigation.

The burden is also upon the complaining party, and the presumption is the other side of the same coin. This is not a litigation lesson, though. It is a fundamental of jurisprudence.


I don't know of any sphere where a burden must be satisfied in order to carry out an investigation, as you seem to be demanding. There are requirements for the issuance of search warrants, but afaiu, some of these have already been deemed satisfied by the courts in this thing.

Nobody here has said Trump has been proven guilty of anything yet. Aren't you the one who is trying to supercede the burden of evidence by calling this a witch hunt when no evidence has yet been presented by those investigating?

Yeah, so first - wow.

The GOP ripped itself apart going after him (paving the way for the Bush II era).

Everyone should care what a president lies about.

Now you seem to be confusing me with someone who believes in quantifiable, absolute, intrinsic value.

right, and the S. Ct. said that was illegal

I for one applaud this newfound interest in how the laws of or country work

It's a pity that the same people wanted to lock Hillary up after the investigation was closed and found no criminal wrongdoing.

Oh well, I'm sure they learned and will never ever make the mistake of falsely criminalizing anything again

For all the crocodile tears about how abhorrent this violent rhetoric from the left is, a subtle reminder that it's all bull**** designed for their own political survival and should be taken as the verbal dung heap that it is:

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/10/u...y-clinton.html

This kingdom we are in is the ancient homeland of the Incas, who left it very imprudently to go and subjugate part of the world, and who were finally destroyed by the Spaniards.

By saying that you hold Americans relatively more valuable? Ho hum.

Ah yes but now they are suggesting Comey went beyond the bounds by saying there was nothing to prosecute.

The principle of a policeman saying they would not hand a case to the prosecutor because there was no crime is too difficult for Republicans.

But it did afford us the marvellous spectacle of a senile man demanding to know why Hillary Clinton was cleared of collusion with Russia and Trump wasn't.

I mean, Trump himself was alluding to shooting Hillary if they lost the election

Rand Paul was reminding people that the Second Amendment was there to shoot government officials

When Gabby Giffords got shot, there was no call from the right to rein in their lunatic fringe

But yeah, the left is the only problem. **** off.

And people on the right (including specifically our own Zorkman) were calling for Hillary to be "locked up" (or worse) both before the investigation was concluded, and after it was announced that the investigation was closed without any charges

The stance on the rule of law is obvious, and it doesn't agree with their lies coming out of people's mouths today; their stance is "how can I bludgeon people into something that's beneficial to me personally, and **** the integrity of the system"

Well, guess what, that work both ways. At the risk of dating myself, as the old drug PSA from the 1980s said, "we learned it by watching you".

I forgot giffords was shot by a david duke supporter

Oh wait no it was by someone who took hallucinogens everyday.

Get your facts before telling people to **** off