Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > Sports and Games > Puzzles and Other Games

Notices

Puzzles and Other Games Discussions about Puzzles and other non-gambling games

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-29-2008, 08:28 AM   #61
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
bobman0330's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 15,913
Re: Bridge

chuck,
1) I play systems off over an overcall of 1nt, but i think it's a matter of partnership agreement.
2) I have a lot of trouble envisioning a hand that makes a 2NT call right. 3H I could see, if he had good support for you. But other than that, you have a good idea of his hand, and he should be leaving it to you to make the decision whether to compete.
3) No. Presumably, P bid 2nt because he only has 2 hearts. Unless he has AQ or something way better than you deserve, you have 2 or 3 heart losers. Plus 3H gets doubled a lot. AND you can blame the disaster that 2nt is sure to be solely on your partner, whereas you would have to share the blame in 3Hx-3
bobman0330 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 01:43 PM   #62
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
durron597's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Folding
Posts: 32,626
Re: Bridge

chuck,

what's your complete distro? i think if you're 6-3-2-2 you should leave him in 2nt but if you have voids you should bid 3h
durron597 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 02:11 PM   #63
LYNCH DURRON597
 
chuckleslovakian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Saving Sinners
Posts: 22,865
Re: Bridge

Quote:
Originally Posted by durron597 View Post
chuck,

what's your complete distro? i think if you're 6-3-2-2 you should leave him in 2nt but if you have voids you should bid 3h
6-3-2-2. Yeah I should of left him there. Then mistakes just keep toppling on top of each other.

Partner bids 3 NT. RHP bids 4c. I pass. Partner bids 4h

Somehow we didnt get doubled. But yeah down 3 kind of hurt. There was some disagreement about how screwed up the bidding worse after the hand. I still think he screwed up worse but clearly I did as well.
chuckleslovakian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 03:32 PM   #64
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
durron597's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Folding
Posts: 32,626
Re: Bridge

yah dude, definitely pass and let partner try to establish long hearts in 2nt
durron597 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 03:39 PM   #65
Pooh-Bah
 
Iron_Yuppie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,545
Re: Bridge

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuckleslovakian View Post
Alright I have a bidding question that came up tonight.

My partner opens 1nt, standard 15-17 hcp balanced
RHP bids 2 clubs
I have 6 hearts to the JT9 and no other HCP.
Normally I transfer

But should I still transfer after the interference?

I did
partner bids 2H
RHP bids 2S
I pass

Should my partner ever bid?

He bid 2NT

Should I put him back in 3h?
IMHO, yes, you should transfer. Your J-high suit with no entries is useless in anything but a heart contract.

No, he shouldn't bid 2NT (or anything else except 3H competitive with 4 hearts) except in the rarest of cases. Was 2 clubs natural? If he had a positional spade stopper, maybe something like QTx, AKxx, xx, AKJx maybe he was hoping to scramble 8 tricks. If this was Matchpoints, this might have some utility. But no, I don't think partner should ever bid.

If 2NT wasn't doubled, I'd leave him there on the faint hope that partner knew what he was doing, and happy to avoid a double when the opps have most of the strength (vulnerability matters here too, probably. not vulnerable, you don't mind going 2 tricks down if the opps have more strength). It's close though, and if doubled, I'm definitely running to 3H.
Iron_Yuppie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 07:42 PM   #66
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Wyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Redoubling with gusto
Posts: 9,346
Re: Bridge

The problem here is that if all of opp's bids are natural then your partner has a nice holding in spades and clubs, and likely nothing in hearts. Your JTxxxx provides no help in NT. I think I am pulling p's 2N to 3H here.

And to whomever asked about the collegiates, I'm a grad student playing on the Michigan team if we can ever figure out whether people born in 1982 are allowed to play. I don't read POG very often, but I will a bit more now that I found a bridge thread. I played in an all-swiss sectional this weekend. We played great for 4 (of 7 rounds). Matches were on the 20VP scale, and we had 57 after 4 rounds. We finished the day with 72. Yuck. Gotta build up my bridge stamina.

Anyone in MI that'd be interested in playing a tournament sometime, my (bridge) partner and I are looking to branch out and play with other people, so feel free to PM.
Wyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2008, 11:10 AM   #67
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
bobman0330's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 15,913
Re: Bridge

Hand 1
QJ2
A972
AJT9
J4

vulnerability unfavorable.

P...E...Me..W
P...P...1..2
3..P...?

3? 3NT? Pass?

hand 2
--
AJT98
AKQJ86
86

both vul.

E...Me..W...P
P...1..1..P
2..?
bobman0330 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2008, 11:55 AM   #68
Pooh-Bah
 
Iron_Yuppie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,545
Re: Bridge

2nd one is relatively easy (this round, anyways): 4H

1st one is brutal, but I'm taking a shot at 3NT. If partner has a 6 card club suit, I think this is odds on. Knowing partners opening tendencies would help (if he is a light opener, or would open 3 clubs on 6 card club suits, that would tip the scales towards passing). I don't think 3H is good; partner should X on most hands with 4+ hearts, your suit quality isn't great, could be a spade ruff, etc.
Iron_Yuppie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2008, 05:11 PM   #69
old hand
 
Myrmidon7328's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,561
Re: Bridge

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iron_Yuppie View Post
2nd one is relatively easy (this round, anyways): 4H

1st one is brutal, but I'm taking a shot at 3NT. If partner has a 6 card club suit, I think this is odds on. Knowing partners opening tendencies would help (if he is a light opener, or would open 3 clubs on 6 card club suits, that would tip the scales towards passing). I don't think 3H is good; partner should X on most hands with 4+ hearts, your suit quality isn't great, could be a spade ruff, etc.
I would agree with both of these. 3N seems like a good spot, especially if Lyour partner has any honor (10 or higher) in spades. My guess is that you guys have about 23 or 24 points between you two, which is a little low, but definitely not unmakeable, especially with a 6 card club suit (which I'm guessing partner has). It's not a great spot, but I think it's probably the best one available.

On your second hand, 4H screams at least 6-5, although I would have probably opened that 2C (then the auction would probably go 2D-3D-3N-4H) and your partner can decide whether or not to carry onto slam.
Myrmidon7328 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2008, 05:45 PM   #70
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Wyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Redoubling with gusto
Posts: 9,346
Re: Bridge

1st one is really tough. 3N could be on, but I'm scared of lefty's heart lead from Qx or Jx. I'm still bidding it at IMPs, but maybe not at MPs.

2nd one I think is a definite 4H call. You have 4 losers. If P passes, you can probably hold it to 3 losers by virtue of your heart fit, and if P corrects, his heart shortness should provide ruffs for your losing hearts.
Wyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 02:29 PM   #71
centurion
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 137
Re: Bridge

Just found this thread (don't frequent 2+2 that often).

Anyway, I play on BBO and am always happy to play with someone new.

Back in the late 90's I was a member of the Canadian Junior Team and played in the World Championships in '97 and '99.

I prefer playing 2/1 GF w/ whatever gadgets you like. PM me if interested in a game sometime.
benz33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2008, 01:50 AM   #72
newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 41
Re: Bridge

I play quite a bit of bridge. I'll have to check in here next time I play. I usually play on yahoo; it gets rather irritating playing with random partners who have no idea how to bid, play, or count cards.
RandomDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2008, 07:20 AM   #73
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
FCBLComish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Retired from WW
Posts: 20,613
Re: Bridge

You would really enjoy playing on Swan or BBO (both free). The quality of play is much better.

We get some POG games going on Swan every once in a while.

AIM= FCBLComish. I can usually be persuaded to play some bridge.
FCBLComish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2008, 09:30 AM   #74
centurion
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 137
Re: Bridge

If you're serious about bridge, BBO really is the place to go. They also have "vugraph" rooms where you can watch actual World class team matches live (including live commentary). Eg. National Championships, World Championships, etc.
benz33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2008, 01:18 PM   #75
should be called sevenfour
 
sixfour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: BDTBL
Posts: 32,350
Re: Bridge

Quote:
Originally Posted by FCBLComish View Post
You would really enjoy playing on Swan or BBO (both free). The quality of play is much better.
O rly? On BBO I just had someone pass my 2 opening bid. I wouldn't mind if it was a simple case of his inability to read the system I use in my profile, but he lists himself as playing Acol where, er, my opening bid is forcing to game. Having 23 points but only three trumps combined is really crappy. I need to find a regular partner asap instead of playing with randoms
sixfour is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive