THE GAME SETUP
The games will have a very basic setup - many sites call it vanilla - consisting of 13 players:
- 3 mafia
- 9 vanilla townies
- 1 cop (with a pre-game randomized view on a vanilla townie
This is regarded as a very balanced setup that mainly lets the result depend on the pure mafia skills of the players; Are you a skilled liar or good at detecting lies? The setup has been run approximately 200 times on this forum and town wins 52 % of the time.
The first season featured a semi-open setup with a fair amount of power roles, so a different setup was chosen this time for the sake of diversity. The third season will feature a completely new setup as well.
THE RULES FOR ADVANCEMENT AND WINNING
- There will be 5 qualifying games. From each of these 2 people will advance based on post-game votes.
- 3 additional players are granted wildcard spots.
- In the finale the winner will likewise be decided by a post-game vote.
The players themselves are voting in the post-game votes. This will be specified again once it's time to vote, but the players won't be voting for an MVP and neither will they be voting for the player they find the most likable or entertaining. Rather, they will be voting for Best Player, which is defined thusly: "The player(s) who were most succesful in convincing you that they are the best player(s) in general, regardless of whether or not that resulted in actually having the most positive impact on the game in question".
This is to ensure that it doesn't become a game of being the funny guy (Entertaining player award) or a game of trying to survive for a long time in the game just for the sake of being remembered or having a chance at having the most impact on the game (MVP award). Plus the MVP award is a very variance-based award - the worst player in the world can end up getting lucky and being the deciding factor in a game, even though it's clear that that player ordinarily wouldn't be expected to perform well because of his/her style or approach to the game or whatever it might be. As we all know it's often a reality that, for example, the most skilled townies in a game are killed off very early by the mafia team to ensure that they can't pose a threat later in the game. This means that these players will never realistically stand a chance of being MVP because they weren't there for the endgame, but that doesn't mean that they aren't the best player. It also doesn't necessarily mean that they
are the best player, of course.
But in case the players get it wrong, an additional rule is set in place to rectify this:
At least ONE player from the winning team will advance. Season 1 showed an unfortunate bias amongst townies to have a preference towards voting for other townies even in games where the mafia curbstomped the town. So this rule ensures that the winning team to at least some degree is fairly rewarded for actually winning the game. If for example the mafia team wins, but the post-game vote results in 3 townies being the top 3 vote-getters, then it will only be the number 1 vote-getter advancing along with the mafia member who got the most amount of votes.
JURY
A jury has already been formed, consisting of finalists from season 1. The names won't be publicly announced, but trust that there is both diversity and a lot of skill and a sense of fairness present in this jury.
This jury will be responsible for picking the 3 wildcard spots. Also, should it happen that someone who qualified for the finale can't or won't play the finale, they will also be picking the replacement for said person(s).
Lastly, I will leave this up for public discussion: I am considering whether or not the jury should get a say in deciding the ultimate winner. Whether it be 25 % or 50 % of the power or whatever. I don't personally have any doubts whatsoever that the jury would get this decision right, so the only thing I am worrying about is whether or not the representatives themselves feel comfortable about this.