2/16 Cupcakes and Lollipops Vanilla Slow Game Thread

[Flyingtoasterz]

Originally Posted by EADGBE

kruze is one of those guys whos gets mislynched pretty much every game because of his crazy erratic play. i wouldnt go after him until i saw him doing something thats wolfy within the context of game dynamics. if we had v/v wagons yesterday i dont see what hes done thats explicitly wolfy yet. i would prob vote you and alot of other people over him at this point.

i like this post but i wouldnt vote caedus

[NLSoldier]

wow this thread is so dead. kruze can u hurry up and find some sketchy mac votes so i can vote someone else

[aao]

CPHoya,

You forget that this game is also about letting people get reads on you as well as you making reads on other people. The fact that some choose to a) post their thoughts immediately as they come up before continuing with the rest of their read through as opposed to b) finish catching up reading and then posting everything in one go, shouldn't really matter at all.

Option a) allows the other players to see that persons thought process much clearer than having to sift through a massive multi-quote that could potentially turn out to be "hey, actually I've actually changed my mind on this guy" which then of course renders the whole post useless and subsequently makes everyone else wonder why you posted that in the first place. Posts like "he makes a massive post here but it's very wish-washy" etc. get made... so your next step is to NOT make that massive post the next time it happens and you get called out for displaying your thoughts.

In short, there's more than just 'your' way of playing werewolf - just because someone else's style isn't the same as yours, it doesn't make it wrong.

[Sun Tzu]

Originally Posted by aao

CPHoya,

You forget that this game is also about letting people get reads on you as well as you making reads on other people. The fact that some choose to a) post their thoughts immediately as they come up before continuing with the rest of their read through as opposed to b) finish catching up reading and then posting everything in one go, shouldn't really matter at all.

Option a) allows the other players to see that persons thought process much clearer than having to sift through a massive multi-quote that could potentially turn out to be "hey, actually I've actually changed my mind on this guy" which then of course renders the whole post useless and subsequently makes everyone else wonder why you posted that in the first place. Posts like "he makes a massive post here but it's very wish-washy" etc. get made... so your next step is to NOT make that massive post the next time it happens and you get called out for displaying your thoughts.

In short, there's more than just 'your' way of playing werewolf - just because someone else's style isn't the same as yours, it doesn't make it wrong.

posting things that don't make sense and with a little effort one would realize don't make sense shouldn't be a stylistic choice

I mean, feel free to post whatever you want, but when people point out obvious flaws, don't get self-righteous about it

[Anarchist]

Originally Posted by CPHoya

My first instinct was to check for a peek too, but it's like +2% to FT's villager chances.

Frankly the only upside to leaving fake peeks for soah is that he can leave real ones when he's the seer. But when he's the seer it's just a sick beat for this obvious reason. If I were soah I'd entertain the possibility of never leaving a peek, ever, since they become part of the game so frequently but are so likely to just be an unresolved problem until the game ends.

This is wrong

[Anarchist]

Originally Posted by well named

cphoya: it wasn't me this time!

I think soah's read on FT is more valuable at this point then the notion that FT is SHC. Soah's read was that he was a villager obviously

This is right

[Anarchist]

gtpitch

[Anarchist]

Globetrotter is wolfy

[Anarchist]

Originally Posted by globetrotter

I'm not going to vote Hoya right now basically b/c I'm interested in his monte case and tbh maybe he does this stuff as a villager too. But yeah, I want to reread monte first b/c he's been pinging my wolfdar.

But I'm out of time so bbl

Wolfy

[Anarchist]

Voting someone prevents them from making a case?

"To be honest maybe he does this as a villager too"

Lolllll

[Sun Tzu]

anarchist is a villager and making sense

[NLSoldier]

hi sun welcome back. are u gonna get a wagon going on me or was that a spite vote?

[Sun Tzu]

Originally Posted by NLSoldier

not sure why you would feel the need to make this post when you've already been gone a half an hour? Unless it didn't feel like a half hour since you were busy in wolfchat?

this seems made up and fake

let's step through a hypothetical thought process

1. why did sun say that when he hasn't posted in half an hour?

2. maybe he's been in wolf chat

3. but then he would have said that in wolf chat, not in the thread

how did you never get to 3?

how do you not even notice that what you said doesn't make any sense at all and is inconsistent with itself?

this looks to me like the kind of pretend thinking that wolves do

[Sun Tzu]

also, I'm pretty sure the whole "you must have been in wolf chat" nonsense is said way more by wolves than villagers and is a wolf tell

[NLSoldier]

Originally Posted by Sun Tzu

also, I'm pretty sure the whole "you must have been in wolf chat" nonsense is said way more by wolves than villagers and is a wolf tell

this i totally agree with. i was actually really annoying myself with those posts. i still thought what you did was weird though.