Without rake your winrate was alsmost 21bb/100 hands.
With current rake you would have a winrate of 7bb/100 hands left.
For me i cant know if the games are still soft enough to have a 21bb/100 hands winrate without rake. (rake = 7 bb/100)
So in the old fishy days the fish would be losing 28bb/100 hands playing against purediesel.
Tutejszy, you would have got to have a winrate of 19,5bb/100 to keep 5,5bb/100. (-14 bb/100rake)
For me it is hard to grasp that players are losing 19,5bb/100 (your winnings+rake) + 14,5 bb (rake they pay) = 34bb/100
So the story is that others players have to be loosing at a rate of 34bb/100 for you to be able to win at a rate of 5,5bb/100.
That's even more then in the good old days. Can you understand that's hard for me to believe ?
PS the std deveation would be much higher then 120, 120 is for 6max. Purediesel had one of 200. With those numbers:
Probability of running at or above observed win rate (5.50 BB/100) over 350000 hands with a true win rate of 0.00 BB/100 (»?«) 5.1877%
Almost 95% sure to be a winning player :-) still good of course. For the average science paper that would be good enough.
PSPS I just realized you pay the most rake as the winning player. So other players loose less then i calculated above. I dont really know how to adjust for that. I dont know if it really changes the story that much.
Last edited by dreddie; 02-04-2017 at 04:26 PM.