Is there a reason you made this a 3 table min?

Could this be dropped to 2 tables?

if there's a queue of people waiting i think that some challenger v challenger matches could be a good way to increase action

1-2k hands on 2 tables take forever

We're starting very soon.

http://img811.imageshack.us/img811/7018/chriseddy.jpg

I ran pretty super hot. gg chriseddy.

Lost in a tight one. Just a few bucks in it in the end. **** me I raged sooooooooo hard at the end. Thank **** I quit.

wiki u have funds on ipoker?

+1

@wiki, nice job dude, 1 more to go for the undertitle.

I haven't heard any other thoughts about what undertitle should say so lemme know if any1 has an opinion

@alexus, yeah I get what you're saying. I kinda doubt it'll be a huge problem but do you have any suggestions that wouldn't be a pain to implement to prevent this?

Also, graphs please

HU MS King, or smth simple

+1 to graphs and post some fun hands

tc, can u put a (crown) or smth behind the name of the current crownholder in the "Challenges complete" section in the OP? hopefully there will have been a bunch of matches played at some point, and wiki can't also win forever. or can he? i mean u can also put the crownholder in 2nd position (like a home advantage kinda thing), but i think that way it's easier to read..

i'll challenge too in a cpl of days I guess.

level?

Already posted.

Ill post some hands soon.

it has current crown holder in the spoiler in the OP. and the current crown holder would always be the person in the last match with the W next to there name.

we're not on the same page here, i mean the current crown holder at the beginning of each respective match.. think about what that section will look like after 20 matches, it'd be nice to read thru it and quickly see who the crown holder was for each match. imo. a * would work too