Villain is totally 1000% maniacal in his betting and raising, but tends to fold/call in semi-normal spots. He shuts down relatively quickly when he's not the aggressor (or when faced with more aggression than he's delivering). I've been check-calling my good holdings and letting him bet them for me most of the time. How do I play this hand against this type? He also raises to about 4x every hand preflop.
I call on button with K 8, BB raises to 4x. I call. K8 would be a raising hand on button agaisnt most villains, right? But if he's raising my hands for me, should I still raise and risk facing a 3-bet I can't call?
Flop (8x): 8 T 6
Villain overbets to 12x...... Hero? I'm not sure if my thinking is right but: If I call here, he's almost definitely betting turn huge (Maniac)...and if I don't improve, I can't call. If I'm behind here, by shoving, at least I'm giving myself a lot of outs twice while potentially getting better hands to fold.
Spoiler:
I shoved, he called with AJ and missed
Last edited by ArcadianSky; 12-16-2014 at 05:51 PM.
Villain is totally 1000% maniacal in his betting and raising
Are you sure he's not actually 500% maniacal? I've been duped many times by players who seemed 1000% maniacal but were really in the triple digits.
You can definitely call a 3-bet against a maniacal 3-bettor -- it's almost a default call anyway. And you should definitely call his flop bet and keep in the stuff with <15% equity. And you can definitely (using this word a lot!) get it in on pretty much every turn. I mean, he's 1000% maniacal after all.
how can you be sure he's not 900% maniacal? There's obviously a 500% difference between 500% and 1000%, so it's clear that in this case he's not 500% maniacal. OR else it would be really obvious his being 500% and not 1000% maniacal.
Need more reads on the maniacal percentage imo. If he's 1000% then fine the play is good, but if he's <750% I fold flop. If he's 286% exactly then I shove for balance purposes.