this is the bottom line, also if your bumhunting a lot, esp at what I'm assuming is mostly lower stakes, and your 3bet is 26%, your an idiot.

lol especially i love the part about me beeing idiot for 3betting 26%.

Some mega-bumhunters' straight up mountains itt.

F OFF IM REGHUNTER 4 LIFE!!

ok, started like 2.5years ago and got much action from bums so didn't see much +ev playing "good" regs at nl50-100. Nowadays u kinda have to play regs too to get action. More fun also, especially when feeling good and playing ur A-game.

if your primarily bumhunting what looks like 1/2, I cant fathom how it could not be an awful strat.

I know it's pretty far off but I'm selling action for SCOOP, get in on it imo

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/16...hares-1184859/

Ure pathetic, i wonder whats the point of bragging in front of mostly busto kids playing penny stakes.

its because of people like you that 'no money heads up everyones solid' is a well know meme in the poker community.

Pretty sure this A+ song (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0iIYg3mGl4) and the 5* thread (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/18...-solid-704340/) that inspired it are the reasons NMHU is a meme.

Chill out, brother.

nice first level thinking there

Keep browsing nvg/bbv seems good for your brain

/mad

that **** would've gotten you killed in Nam

Anyone have any idea how many hands per hour would it be possible to get in live heads up, assuming a reasonably competent dealer?

maybe 40 something..

Anyone here NO12 on b2b?

Just how many levels of thinking do I need to figure out the reason for the meme? Enlighten me.

I've played some live HU. 40+ seems reasonable if you're not getting to a lot of rivers.

Hey looking for a website that does dual monitor wallpaper for two 30inch (2560 x 1600). ???

sick brag

http://interfacelift.com/wallpaper/d...ate/2_screens/

Ty

Math question, because i'm playing 55% of hands OOp lifitime and trying to tighten up:

Let's say i select J3s in BB and HEM shows me as -39bb/100 loser (obviously wrong result because of small sample size and because usually i just fold it preflop) and then filter for 32o and it shows me as -100.04bb/100 loser. But in 2nd case i have 100% fold preflop, so there is no rake.

What I'm trying to find out is does result with J3s hand at -39bb/100 inludes rake already or it does not? So what i wanna know is to see if it doesn't include rake, then possibly with counting rake my J3s hand would show me as (in example) as -127bb/100 loser, in which case open-folding 100% preflop would be more profitbale, given that it would equal to -100bb/100

you fold J3s? thought you were playing regs alot?

Ok, I must admit - i lied. Guilty. Busted. I suck. I fold J3s against regs. I don't play 55% of hands OOP. I play only 53%. Open stove and see yourself, how J3s gets unticked when you select 53% instead of 55%.

Now, please, Mr. in Top 20 - help litle fish to find answers to my previous post?

that thread is pretty funny. the old crew being wrong and dissing people that knew better. now, most good players are minraising 72o, but i don't think they will 2 years from now (although, maybe it's profitable even vs 80% defend?)

PD your avatar is nut tilting

BOOOOOM, your so dang right!

i don't get it, what does it mean? how can the rake be an additional -88bb/100?