Come to Sydney, we be much better!

Trying to install one skin, antivirus gives out a warning about PDM.rootshell. WTF?

just watched Warrior really good movie!

I've tried to deposit into new room. Haven't deal with eruo beofre. I have $ moneybookers, this poker in venice multiplatform has single cashier for all of their skins on different networks and has only deposit in EURO. So I deposit E500 (in MB it shows $648.19), but on poker tables it shows $641.03. So obviously there is some conversion going on. Is it a losing deal? Is it better to chose skin where i don't have to have euro conversion, since my Mb in $ and tables on that network is $.

I just saw the US version, I lasted 30 min, it was really bad, then I just fastforwarded and saw the next hour in 10 sec.

This guy shoulda taken a lesson from his other fishy buddies and HNR me when he had the chance...


@100NL

31% 3bet, 0% Fold to 4bet... he rivered a gutshot with 64s and trips with 75o in 4bet pots to start the session off.

No huge pots But playing 400bb deep against aggro fish is fun.

The best part, it was a short table and I lost 25 bucks in the process of busting him.

Finally I've got fed up with how bad I run. I've almost payed to the programmer to develop a program that can calculate not only All-in EV luck, but also Sklansky bucks/street-by-street luck/coolers count, but found an amazing program and ran my DB on it:



The only thing is subjective here is how it calculates and converts Coolers balance. It does NOT accounts for our ability to take way more money in that scenario from fish, and lose minimum to the fish back in revert scenario.

Also, please, let me FINE-TUNE filters, please, to measure even more precise.

Also, I'll try SECT, see how it's different.

James May from Top Gear trying to take penalties. Made me lol.

.

just watched the most hilarious f**k up on the PS PCA live feed ever... heads up both have 50bb's roughly, good players button raises button with Kd9s and fish (who's running super hot) calls with 96dd, flop comes 935dd, fish CRs flop, turns a 9, fish barrels pretty large, good player calls, leaves a PSB for fish OTR. rivers a 6s giving fish the boat and he shuvs, good player goes into tank for about 10mins, he is getting 3:1 so pretty easy call down with trips K-kicker, but villains pretty fishy / passive - anyway eventually good player lays it down (leaving himself 10bb's) commentators are like "thats the greatest laydown in history blah blah"

Anyway a few minutes pass and they let us know that actually theey'd screwed up the graphic and good player had K5... lol i feel cheated

^^ahahhahahaha.

***
trying to install and run SECT, will compare the Sklansky graphs and put it in here.

Sick life for the fish who satellited in & just shipped it.

mbn

How do i make SECT file with extension .jar run on my comp? I've installed JRE 7, no help. Poker player professour has created that SECT program for HEM DB, i wanna run it.

Whats up E Z money

What is penalties

While I'm trying to make it work, one hand bothers me. It's against a fish, my image is clean, villain is kinda standard, weak lose-passive, so far proved that he can't even basic hand read 9but then he surprised me big time) trying to be stationy on flop/turn, but reluctant to pay off OTR. I want to understand his real reason for why he tanked, and then called off river, did he really hand-readed me that well or it was his "i don't give a !@#$, i call and see":

Grabbed by Holdem Manager
NL Holdem $4(BB) Replayer
($106)
Hero ($542)

Dealt to Hero K J

Hero raises to $12, calls $8

FLOP ($24) 2 7 8

bets $16, Hero calls $16

TURN ($56) 2 7 8 A

checks, Hero bets $18, calls $18

RIVER ($92) 2 7 8 A T

checks, Hero bets $66, calls $60.15 (AI)

Hero shows K J
(Pre 61%, Flop 23.7%, Turn 13.6%)

shows 7 Q
(Pre 39%, Flop 76.3%, Turn 86.4%)

wins $211

1/3 bet OTT IP is my standardish mix up, because it works well within my gameplan, also in this hand I wanted to strongarm myself as trapping with strong hand/inducing image and to setup river bluff shove.

***
Can't make SECT work, here's the graph from cooler hunter, which shows that ALL-IN EV shows less then 1/3 of the real bad run picture. i'm up $20k on this graph PS lifetime all limits, had to be up $52k:



And in big blinds I'm up 206 buy-ins, but had to be up 430 buy-ins, so basically 224 buy-ins below known EV:

Wouldn't worry about that hand at all. Looks perfect to me, although flop could be a fold whatever. Pretty sick he called, would expect weak-loose-passive fish to fold that hand or any pair worse than Ax like 99% of the time. Unlucky.

Don't get the program you're using. Can't believe something like that is out there and people aren't using it, so not really trusting it yet. lol. You know how the Cooler Hunter EV, and Street by Street EV work??? Do you have to program in yourself what is a cooler or something, because that's the kinda thing that varies hugely opponent to opponent. Looks interesting anyway. Anything to prove you're the unluckiest guy of all time right PD?

Yoyo, Kdougs

Drunk or something?

Yeah, you nailed it, anything to prove that i run ultra-bad. This program you can trust in one thing - Sklansky bucks calculation, which was similarly made by Professour in SECT program few years ago. It's an orange line, called Street by street. Other one cooler hunter is way more complicated, and it still doesn't count those situations which you'd have to manually decide if you really got coolered or played bad etc, but I've turned on "Apply Bad/Delicate play" filter on, so it helps. Also, Just made full-house+ in filters 3bet pot+, raised pot and limped pot, which would be without doubt correctly calculating coolers. So the bottom point this orange line shows close to at least 80% of your real run compare to lone all-in EV, which we have in HEM.

Street by street EV can't be accurately calculated, the results are biased because not all hands go to showdown, so don't even try. Programs like SECT give erroneous results.

^^Dude, smart people were doing it and they know it. Their line does not show full picture, but the implication of it is pretty strong. So donteven...

Gangsta chick is so good!

Lol aquadoug is a legend!

I tried both, and SECT gives about a 5000% different number than that other program.

FWIW Im like 100 BI over EV on that program and pretty much neutral on SECT

I must suck @ poker, all luck

PD pretty good discussion about SECT, might find pointers how to run/troubleshoot it as well

http://forums.holdemmanager.com/3rd-...nter-sect.html

Also, if you read the whole linked thread, you should be convinced that these types of programs are a waste of your time due to the showdown bias. There are much better directions to channel your academic efforts.

Could it be possible that suboptimal smaller SB VPIP achieves higher winrates at bumhunting HU? Like: http://www.pokertableratings.com/ipo...ch/JosifFekali

Yeah I know lolsamplesize, but could it be possible that fishes are used to standardish play where opposition opens 80-90%+ buttons and they play same vs 50% VPIP guys and don't realize their range is much stronger?