Quote:
Originally Posted by 0desmu1
Yeah, I have no idea what the issue is here. You're protecting your table while you think you have an edge, and you're not when you don't. Nothing wrong with that. Him seeing it as "disrespectful" is entirely his own issue.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Codecci
Ike, WCG etc would probably tend towards muumi 's because, if ever, they always end up in his situation since they are endbosses.
+1
Thanks for bringing this up Barewire. I was lately considering posting about the issue of sitting stronger regs.
Some of the stronger regs claim it isn't ethical if you sit and only agree to play 1 table and/or refuse topping up your stack to a minimum amount and/or only sit them if they have other action (can even be a couple 6max tables they are playing).
At times these stronger regs will get so angry that they will start grimming, threatening or even chasing you around the lobby blocking all of your tables while they already have their own.
It's my view (obviously biased) that no one owns the tables and if a weaker reg thinks he has an edge at the moment or that the stronger reg will just not be arsed and give up the table there is nothing wrong with that. I think that this culture of entitlement and bullying should be eliminated.