Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
****General Questions THREAD**** ****General Questions THREAD****

05-07-2014 , 02:15 AM
You should be opening less than 100% of BTNs as a default, but the reasoning in this paragraph is misguided:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exothermic
To not lose $ on the sb dont you only need to open atleast 50% of btns?, when i open 100% vs the avg reg i feel like im not getting atleast 50% folds & not able at all to defend vs 3bets without being exploited(in zoom it takes a while to get reads).
Your goal on the BTN can't be to simply "not lose money", so that 50% figure is irrelevant. Your opponent needs to defend a lot* more than 50% against a min-open** to prevent 72o from turning a profit (unless he doesn't flat anything preflop, lol).


*50nl has a lot of rake, so it might not be a lot more there.

**I'm assuming you are min-opening, because of the phrase "at least 50% folds", which is unconnected to any other raise size.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exothermic
... most regs will suggest to do it.
Not in 2014.
****General Questions THREAD**** Quote
05-07-2014 , 09:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rei Ayanami
You should be opening less than 100% of BTNs as a default, but the reasoning in this paragraph is misguided:



Your goal on the BTN can't be to simply "not lose money", so that 50% figure is irrelevant. Your opponent needs to defend a lot* more than 50% against a min-open** to prevent 72o from turning a profit (unless he doesn't flat anything preflop, lol).


*50nl has a lot of rake, so it might not be a lot more there.

**I'm assuming you are min-opening, because of the phrase "at least 50% folds", which is unconnected to any other raise size.



Not in 2014.


^^ Care to explain why?. If you open with 7-2o & i call a 50% range oop & have flop fold vs cbet of 39% & you bet half pot how is 7-2o making $?(plz lets not get into semantics about betting 1/3 pot or anything).


another question:
I notice alot of regs are defending my 4bets with a call nowadays & im not seeing too much light 5bet jams, im now wondering if 4bet bluffs should even contain blockers anymore but rather s.c n gap connectors & also what ratio of bluffs to value/stack off range should your 4bet range be vs your typical 15-20% 3bettor who is calling alot more 4bets in today's game be?.
****General Questions THREAD**** Quote
05-07-2014 , 09:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exothermic
^^ Care to explain why?. If you open with 7-2o & i call a 50% range oop & have flop fold vs cbet of 39% & you bet half pot how is 7-2o making $?(plz lets not get into semantics about betting 1/3 pot or anything).
72o is never drawing dead preflop. 72o is very rarely drawing dead on the flop. 72o has other options than to cbet mindlessly.
****General Questions THREAD**** Quote
05-07-2014 , 09:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exothermic
^^ Care to explain why?. If you open with 7-2o & i call a 50% range oop & have flop fold vs cbet of 39% & you bet half pot how is 7-2o making $?(plz lets not get into semantics about betting 1/3 pot or anything).
Let's work with your figures but assume villain has a reasonable 3-bet frequency.

(% villain folds)*(EV of villain folding in bb) + (% villain 3-bets)*(EV of villain 3-betting in bb) + (% villain calls)*(EV of villain calling in bb) >= 0

(0.50)*(1.5) + (0.20)*(-1.5) + (0.30)*(x) >= 0

x >= -1.5. So basically, 72o can simply surrender the pot postflop every time and be a neutral EV open. But 72o has equity when called, so it'll make more than that against a 50% defender.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exothermic
another question:I notice alot of regs are defending my 4bets with a call nowadays & im not seeing too much light 5bet jams, im now wondering if 4bet bluffs should even contain blockers anymore but rather s.c n gap connectors &
Depends on stack sizes. Adding SCs is good at deeper stacks, but unnecessary at ~100bb.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exothermic
also what ratio of bluffs to value/stack off range should your 4bet range be vs your typical 15-20% 3bettor who is calling alot more 4bets in today's game be?.
This is an easily solvable spot, and it should make good homework for you. Pick a ratio such that hands like 87s can't ship profitably.
****General Questions THREAD**** Quote
05-07-2014 , 10:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rei Ayanami
Let's work with your figures but assume villain has a reasonable 3-bet frequency.

(% villain folds)*(EV of villain folding in bb) + (% villain 3-bets)*(EV of villain 3-betting in bb) + (% villain calls)*(EV of villain calling in bb) >= 0

(0.50)*(1.5) + (0.20)*(-1.5) + (0.30)*(x) >= 0

x >= -1.5. So basically, 72o can simply surrender the pot postflop every time and be a neutral EV open. But 72o has equity when called, so it'll make more than that against a 50% defender.



Depends on stack sizes. Adding SCs is good at deeper stacks, but unnecessary at ~100bb.



This is an easily solvable spot, and it should make good homework for you. Pick a ratio such that hands like 87s can't ship profitably.

Me: 100bb, open to 2bb otb
villain: 100bb 3bets to 7bb in the bb

me: 4bet 17bb

pot now 24bb

villain: ships 93 more bb

If i fold 80% of my 4bet range here villain shows immediate profit( winning 96bb & risking 93bb), but that's clearly not all to take into account cause he still has equity when called, he has 31% equity vs 10's+, aq+ stack off range. So then instead of risking 93bb hes actually now risking 93*31.83%= 64.17bb. So if i had a stack off range of 10's+, aq+(4.68% hands) & i have a 4bet range of 2.75% of hands * 4.68%= 12.87% of hands then villain has a profitable light 5bet jam with 87s, hence my 4bet range in this spot should be anything less than 12.87% of hands?.


^^^ Is my calculations off here?, i dont do this sort of stuff normally hahah so i mean if im off let me know buddy.
****General Questions THREAD**** Quote
05-07-2014 , 10:13 AM
He loses (200*31.83%) - 93 when called, not 64.17 bb. Rest is close enough.
****General Questions THREAD**** Quote
05-12-2014 , 12:56 PM
Is it true that you can see if you get the button first at pokerstars heads up cashgametables?
****General Questions THREAD**** Quote
05-12-2014 , 02:17 PM
i mean i guess, but if u consistently only start on btn and end on btn then you'll get banned if ppl report u
****General Questions THREAD**** Quote
05-12-2014 , 02:27 PM
i know it is forbidden and don´t want to do it.
anyway i would like to know how you can see it when you join the table at first and wait for opponents (i don`t mean that you see it when someone joins and you are asked to post your blind)?
****General Questions THREAD**** Quote
05-14-2014 , 05:11 PM
looks like u can see where the btn is be4 u join someone. im not sure if it resets or not when do actually join. i dont see where the btn is on my empty tables but after i play a game and they leave then it will display btn.
****General Questions THREAD**** Quote
05-17-2014 , 03:31 AM
Any good books for HU, recommendations? Heads up SnG, I should add.
****General Questions THREAD**** Quote
05-17-2014 , 07:51 AM
tipton
****General Questions THREAD**** Quote
05-17-2014 , 09:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by risk2Dupside
tipton
ty
****General Questions THREAD**** Quote
05-17-2014 , 10:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by shahe
Any good books for HU, recommendations? Heads up SnG, I should add.
http://www.twoplustwo.com/books/poke...-limit-holdem/

Might be a bit dated but for starting HU players it's still solid i guess.
****General Questions THREAD**** Quote
05-22-2014 , 09:14 AM
Can someone please recommend me good hu videos from Run It Once?
I have just got the elite subscription and I am not sure which videos to watch right away for hu. Which coaches besides Phil Galfond and Ben Sulsky are there to get some decent hu content out?
****General Questions THREAD**** Quote
05-22-2014 , 11:56 AM
Kevin Rabichow / barewire on here
****General Questions THREAD**** Quote
05-23-2014 , 09:47 AM
Kevin Rabichow looks very good but he only has 3 videos. Anyone else?
****General Questions THREAD**** Quote
06-24-2014 , 06:03 AM
Just wondering if its worthwhile playing 0.10/0.20 on IPoker given the rake?
****General Questions THREAD**** Quote
06-24-2014 , 08:08 AM
how much is it in bb/100?
****General Questions THREAD**** Quote
06-24-2014 , 08:27 AM


Just bought Hm2 so is that 15.67/100bb in Rake that i am paying?
****General Questions THREAD**** Quote
06-24-2014 , 09:56 AM
play husngs until you have a ~1k br (or some amount you are comfortable with), then play nl50; gl.
****General Questions THREAD**** Quote
06-24-2014 , 08:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by trlele


Just bought Hm2 so is that 15.67/100bb in Rake that i am paying?
no its some type of currency $/pound etc. depending i guess on your settings. prob comes std as $ tho? anyways you can tell this because if you add them you get that total, as opposed to the weighted avg--see how bb/100 column does it. so if that 15.67 is set in $ which i suspect it is, then your avg bb would be worth like $.32 or so since you're playing mostly in pounds. so thats like 49bb rake in 600 hands, or ~8bb/100.
****General Questions THREAD**** Quote
06-24-2014 , 08:52 PM
yeah i changed it to Euro as i was playing on IPoker but I changed it back to USA$ in new pic now

The 15.67 was Rake paid in general because when i added Rake in Euros it was also 15.67, but as you can see in new pic i added rake in USA $ and its $22.39, so basically the 15.67 was rake paid in Euros.

So if i have this right it looks like i paid 110 big blinds in rake for the 591 hands played?

112 x 0.20 cents bb = $22.39? so this is 20 bb/100 on average?

****General Questions THREAD**** Quote
06-24-2014 , 11:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by trlele

So if i have this right it looks like i paid 110 big blinds in rake for the 591 hands played?

112 x 0.20 cents bb = $22.39? so this is 20 bb/100 on average?
using your numbers here yeah 112bb/591 = 19bb/100.



but you need apples to apples. your rake is $22.39, but you played in euros/pounds, which $1=1.7pounds, and $1=1.35euros, so your bb is worth more than $.20 its worth like 1.6*$.20 = $.32, because 80% of your hands are in pounds.

so effectively your bb is worth $.32 and you paid $22.39 in rake which is 70bb or ~12bb/100.
****General Questions THREAD**** Quote
06-24-2014 , 11:09 PM
So is it worth playing Hu cash vs HUSNGS as i prefer cash over the other, or does the rake make it not worthwhile?

samooth mentioned to play HUSNG but i don't really like the Hu Sng format quick blind increase sort of shove fest when getting low in blinds
****General Questions THREAD**** Quote

      
m