Quote:
Originally Posted by card
I think you played the hand fine. If he folds to 3 bets I would do the same thing id just under rep big hands preflop. Now these 2 + 2 guys are morons if they are not going to read your post and say I have AA I am all in. It is the reason they are on here and not playing any games making money. If the guy never pots the turn its a clear fold. On the turn I would call against any top pair type hands. You guys can see in his hand above he calls down with ace high. If this Maniac bluffs hes obviously not over betting the pot. This is a very easy fold.
No maniac is over bet jamming the river with top pair here. Its the nuts or nothing. It is clearly not nothing because he shows in the hand above he under bets the pot with his bluffing range. I am glad you posted this hand. This is a clear example of how many bad players are on 2+2 giving bad advice lol.
|
ok first, dont berate players u know nothing about. Two, who the hell r u? Tom Dwan? No?ok so shut up. And three, why does he have to have the nuts there? because u say so? imo, it was very played badly (coming from a player who actually makes money)... if that matters... so say wat u wish but dont tell ppl they're thinking wrong and ur way of thinking is absolutely correct.... thats y he posted his hand so ppl not one person could comment on the hand... i am not saying ur wrong.. but dont be so close minded...