Quote:
Originally Posted by fityfmi
It's pretty funny how many ppl in this thread believe the BB should call everything that beats AJ otr, but also think the SB is never bluffing. This is ****ing why you don't base your playes on some stupid stats, that in all likelyhood will not tell you much about this specific situation. The way you appearantly play poker is to make assumptions out of close to thin air. In this case you're assuming "SB is allways valuebetting", and "BB is allways calling his bluffcatchers". Ok, might be true, might be false. A damn 3bet stat won't tell us **** about the truth of those assumptions. Experiance with the player pool can only be so helpful. Actually, this hand was played dead readless at 100NL zoom. Stacksizes are the way they are because of zoom, not because we have played before. If I had reads that told me what to do in this situation, I wouldn't have posted the damn hand. Any idiot can check back AJ here if you have a read that BB is allways calling. Any idiot can fold the turn if he has a read that BB is autobetting all his air on the flop. Of course we should base our strategy in game theory. It's so obvious that your assumptions will never be correct at GTO. It's so easy to see that this is not the convergence point. Your approach to the game is pretty damn pathetic. We are not in 2010 anymore.
#tiltrant
if #tiltrant was meant to advocate ur GTO play or support for GTO play iin this situation, then I fail to understand why u half pot the river, which is as non gto as possible.. if ur half potting river whch you somehow managed to get to, GTO-101 will tell you what vilain's calling frequency should be and it is pretty damn high for him to breakeven with that bet sizing...
also some ppl loled at jesse's gto players winning at 2bb/100 comment, might i remind you folks jesse is being generous, it would actually be 0bb/100(-ve with the rake)