Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerXanadu
He means "there will be no increased poker stakes."
If the compact falls through, nothing in the bill becomes law. No increase in poker stakes, limits, buy-in, hours; no tax breaks for pari-mutuels; no wagering age limit changes at the casinos; etc. Nothing changes from the way things are now. Back to square one. All of the steps I listed for implementation have to be completed before any of the changes voted in the bill take effect. If it fails at any step, nothing changes - the whole bill would essentially be null and void.
|
If the bill falls through and no compact is signed what is the thought on the State asking for a shut down on table games?
So far the Federal government has not acted on McCollum's (FL Attorney General) request for a shut down and I don't think they will as long as the State and the Tribe are negotiating in good faith.
If the compact is not agreed to does the State give up on the Tribe's escrow account money that had been due to the under the voided compact? I think the uncertainty of the continuation of table games is the key to the compact being agreed to by both parties. The State doesn’t want to lose the current and future payment income from the tribe on both slots and tables and the Tribe doesn't want to lose the table game revenue and all the ancillary income that comes from having a real casino resort rather than just slot halls.
Am I on the right track here with my thoughts?