|
|
| Poker Legislation Discussions of various poker-related laws and steps players can take to push for better laws. |
06-06-2011, 10:30 AM
|
#1
|
|
old hand
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,349
|
eWalletXpress seized in November but not in any indictments yet, WTF??
So all of us with balances in our eWalletXpress accounts had it all seized in November 2010 according to the liars at eWalletXpress, which is owned by parent company, Navaho Networks. We have not heard a peep about our accounts since.
I have thoroughly reviewed the seizure requests and indictments from both Black Friday and Blue Monday, and I cannot find anything that appears to relate to EWX or Navaho. So who seized their bank accounts and when will we hear more?? Could it be a sign of more indictments to come? Why would EWX have been seized 8 months ago, with no word since...yet UseMyWallet gets seized only two weeks before the indictments hit?
|
|
|
06-06-2011, 10:32 AM
|
#2
|
|
old hand
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Pontiff of Poodles
Posts: 1,980
|
Re: eWalletXpress seized in November but not in any indictments yet, WTF??
When was the last time you wrote eWalletXpress?
|
|
|
06-06-2011, 12:14 PM
|
#3
|
|
old hand
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,349
|
Re: eWalletXpress seized in November but not in any indictments yet, WTF??
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaosReigns
When was the last time you wrote eWalletXpress?
|
I send emails to their support@ and payouts@ addresses about once a month. Since November, I have received zero responses. I am already fairly certain all the money is gone forever, but I'd still like to know which seizures these are a part of, because they sure has not turned up yet.
|
|
|
06-06-2011, 12:20 PM
|
#4
|
|
old hand
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Pontiff of Poodles
Posts: 1,980
|
Re: eWalletXpress seized in November but not in any indictments yet, WTF??
I would write to the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the US Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri and the US Attorney for the District of Maryland seeking information. The attorney in Missouri seems to have been involved in past seizure cases and the other two attorneys have been involved in recent seizures.
|
|
|
06-06-2011, 12:56 PM
|
#5
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,528
|
Re: eWalletXpress seized in November but not in any indictments yet, WTF??
Whatever happened with ePassporte funds as well?
From the PPA: "cease-and-desist orders against ePassporte"
I don't ever recall an indictment for ePassporte or ewalletxpress
|
|
|
06-06-2011, 12:57 PM
|
#6
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 7,693
|
Re: eWalletXpress seized in November but not in any indictments yet, WTF??
Were there indictments for every previous seizure of funds? I had thought many of them were simply uncontested and only because a judge granted a seizure warrant. The sites then made the players whole so no one followed it up and it was solely a money grab.
IMO this seems to be the feds thinking as well. There have been no provisions set up for players to make claim of their money in both ewalletexpress and UMW/QT and I wonder if the feds thought they were simply going to take the money and that's it.
Here's a disturbing response from the UMW thread where the players have decided to make claim of their money and at first some of the agents involved where sympathetic and were going to "try and get to the bottom of it" as players were contacting them, but now that's turned into a nasty tune in at least one case.
Quote:
Originally Posted by turtlehed11
I just spoke with Jim Eastman as well. He said we have your money and you will not be getting any of it from us. Like others have posted he said we need to go to Quicktender to get our money. He also told me that "If you think Quicktender is out of business, you are wrong".
He also told me that the Government could be coming after our houses and cars but they were not doing that. I asked him if I was supposed to be thankful to him for not taking my personal property as well as my money. I explained that the UIGEA was set up to prosecute banks and NOT PLAYERS, and that internet poker was not illegal under any federal law in the United States. He said, "We got a judge to sign a seizure warrant, so that is how we were able to take the money".
Innocent until proven guilty my ass. I would encourage everyone to call him, he said his phone was blowing up and sounded very annoyed.
Jim Eastman
239-745-5919
|
Last edited by Nofx Fan; 06-06-2011 at 01:16 PM.
|
|
|
06-06-2011, 01:02 PM
|
#7
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,528
|
Re: eWalletXpress seized in November but not in any indictments yet, WTF??
A quote that is like watching a train wreck happen in front of your eyes
From June 9, 2009 PPA:
"Your money is safe at the major poker sites. I cannot speak for all the poker sites, but several have assured me that your money is safe and secure; however you should check with whatever site you play on. In most instances the poker sites have a procedure in which they segregate player funds, your assets and not theirs, and keep them in bank accounts that are completely separate from their operating funds – in fact, player accounts are kept in different banks."
|
|
|
06-06-2011, 02:41 PM
|
#8
|
|
PPA Board Member/LSN Dir
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: It's a PPA post only if so stated
Posts: 5,589
|
Re: eWalletXpress seized in November but not in any indictments yet, WTF??
ePassporte was never charged. It was threatened and it ceased doing business with poker players. It also returned all the money to anyone who asked for it.
The quote in LT22's post above is clearly correct with respect to PokerStars. And PokerStars has paid everyone back.
In 2009, which was just the beginning of the DOJ pursuit of payment processors, I think most believed FTP followed a similar policy regarding player funds. That FTP at some point did not keep player funds fully segregated is now all to painfully obvious and FTP players are paying the price. I don't think anyone expected this of too many other sites, so checking with the sites specifically was a good thing to suggest.
I do not know the details regarding ewalletexpress. I do know that it is impossible for the Feds to seize money without some form of judicial process being put in place. The process does not necessarily have to be an indictment.
Skallagrim
Last edited by Skallagrim; 06-06-2011 at 02:47 PM.
|
|
|
06-06-2011, 04:39 PM
|
#9
|
|
journeyman
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 373
|
Re: eWalletXpress seized in November but not in any indictments yet, WTF??
FWIW, I just talked to the rather lame EWxpress 'customer service' rep. No news, obviously, but the fact that they still have a manned phone line might mean something.
|
|
|
06-06-2011, 05:18 PM
|
#10
|
|
old hand
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Pontiff of Poodles
Posts: 1,980
|
Re: eWalletXpress seized in November but not in any indictments yet, WTF??
I have done a little more research and the only source for the funds being seized seems to be eWalletXpress itself. Except for the phone line being manned, it almost seems like someone within the company walked off with the funds and ewxp decided to blame the government.
A call to the authorities is definitely in order.
|
|
|
06-06-2011, 07:39 PM
|
#12
|
|
veteran
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 3,335
|
Re: eWalletXpress seized in November but not in any indictments yet, WTF??
I really don't know much about the issues with all these ewallets. However, from reviewing all the posts and reading some of the articles, IMO, some, if not all, of these ewallets may be simply ceasing business and absconding with customer funds and blaming a DOJ seizure which never actually occurred.
IMO, FT and Cereus may be using the DOJ seizure of their accounts by vastly overstating the amount of funds that the DOJ actually seized.
|
|
|
06-06-2011, 09:22 PM
|
#13
|
|
veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 3,132
|
Re: eWalletXpress seized in November but not in any indictments yet, WTF??
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPFisher55
IMO, FT and Cereus may be using the DOJ seizure of their accounts by vastly overstating the amount of funds that the DOJ actually seized.
|
How much did FTP and Cereus say was seized, respectively?
|
|
|
06-07-2011, 03:27 AM
|
#14
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 7,693
|
Re: eWalletXpress seized in November but not in any indictments yet, WTF??
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPFisher55
I really don't know much about the issues with all these ewallets. However, from reviewing all the posts and reading some of the articles, IMO, some, if not all, of these ewallets may be simply ceasing business and absconding with customer funds and blaming a DOJ seizure which never actually occurred.
IMO, FT and Cereus may be using the DOJ seizure of their accounts by vastly overstating the amount of funds that the DOJ actually seized.
|
This is a possibility. I'm just glad we are at least looking at these issues to try and find out what is the truth, because if it's not this, then it has all kinds of implications. If it is this, then we at least know who to go after. The how we do that will have to be figured out as well though, in either case.
|
|
|
06-07-2011, 12:01 PM
|
#15
|
|
veteran
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 3,335
|
Re: eWalletXpress seized in November but not in any indictments yet, WTF??
Quote:
Originally Posted by early325
How much did FTP and Cereus say was seized, respectively?
|
No one, including the DOJ, has actually stated how much was seized and from whom. No online poker entity has presented actual figures with any proof; just lots of claims like the DOJ seized all our former US players money. If the DIJ really seized so much then how come PS quickly paid its former US players?
I don't know and I just don't believe all the common hype, assumptions and theories which too often are presented as facts.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:17 PM.
|