Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > General Poker Discussion > The Poker Legislation Forum, Brought to You by the PPA

Notices

The Poker Legislation Forum, Brought to You by the PPA Discussions of various poker-related laws and steps players can take to push for better laws.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-04-2013, 04:44 PM   #1
veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,014
AGA Attempts to Block PS Entry to NJ

Quote:
Originally Posted by LastLife View Post
Lets start the derail of this thread. Stars is banned from Nevada and still has an uphill battle in NJ. Borgata is owned by Boyd/MGM though a subsidiary and both of them have a partnership with Bwin, the company that started this discussion in the first place.

Caesars has 25k rooms in Vegas alone, WSOP, one of(if not the) largest rewards memberships in the world, and is easily the most prepared US gaming interest for the future IPoker market. Saying they will be anything other than the top provider in the US market is probably wrong. Saying that any other company will be able to be more creative is wishful thinking. The only thing that is going to hold Caesars back is their future bankruptcy, but even then creditors stand to gain a whole lot more by allowing Caesars to continue their expansion online.

My previous post was simply an example of what could happen wrt this issue in a highly segregated market like we will have in the near future. I highly doubt Caesars will ever do anything this stupid. They stand to make several times more off the IPoker market by funneling players to their casinos.
caesars def will have a big site, dont' get me wrong.

what makes you think stars has an 'uphill battle' who exactly are they battling? nj has already said they're welcoming stars with open arms and look forward to having such a great foreign company in the US
Gags30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 04:56 PM   #2
journeyman
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 287
Re: NJ online poker legislation (passed)

Here we go.....


Nathan Vardi ‏@nathanvardi

The American Gaming Association has filed a brief opposing PokerStars' petition for casino authorization in New Jersey.
Retweeted by Kevin Mathers

The casino lobby says PokerStars "operated as a criminal enterprise" and can't demonstrate good "integrity, and honesty required by NJ law."
Retweeted by Kevin Mathers
mag8500 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 04:59 PM   #3
veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,014
Re: NJ online poker legislation (passed)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mag8500 View Post
Here we go.....


Nathan Vardi ‏@nathanvardi

The American Gaming Association has filed a brief opposing PokerStars' petition for casino authorization in New Jersey.
Retweeted by Kevin Mathers

The casino lobby says PokerStars "operated as a criminal enterprise" and can't demonstrate good "integrity, and honesty required by NJ law."
Retweeted by Kevin Mathers
ya i mean, all pokerstars did was act with the utmost integrity and honesty, complied with the DOJ 100%, repaid all americans funds, then settled with the DOJ and plead no wrongdoing whatsoever



absurd that this even comes up...
Gags30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 05:14 PM   #4
journeyman
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 287
Re: NJ online poker legislation (passed)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gags30 View Post
ya i mean, all pokerstars did was act with the utmost integrity and honesty, complied with the DOJ 100%, repaid all americans funds, then settled with the DOJ and plead no wrongdoing whatsoever



absurd that this even comes up...
I don't think its absurd at all. I agree PS is a well run company and has done everything the DOJ has asked of them but did think the brick n mortar casino's in AC were just going to let PS roll into town and take over?!?!
mag8500 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 05:19 PM   #5
veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,014
Re: NJ online poker legislation (passed)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mag8500 View Post
I don't think its absurd at all. I agree PS is a well run company and has done everything the DOJ has asked of them but did think the brick n mortar casino's in AC were just going to let PS roll into town and take over?!?!
so because AC casinos are known as being greedy and shady we're supposed to expect this type of behavior and not criticize it?
Gags30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 05:27 PM   #6
journeyman
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 287
Re: NJ online poker legislation (passed)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gags30 View Post
so because AC casinos are known as being greedy and shady we're supposed to expect this type of behavior and not criticize it?

I'm not sure I follow what you're saying. All casinos are greedy, just not AC's. What is there to criticize? Why wouldn't you expect a casino or any business for that matter to just let a competitor come in and take over? If I was a shareholder in BYD or CZR I would be mad as all hell if they didn't try to put a stop to this. I'm not saying its going to work but its obviously expected.
mag8500 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 05:35 PM   #7
veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,014
Re: NJ online poker legislation (passed)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mag8500 View Post
I'm not sure I follow what you're saying. All casinos are greedy, just not AC's. What is there to criticize? Why wouldn't you expect a casino or any business for that matter to just let a competitor come in and take over? If I was a shareholder in BYD or CZR I would be mad as all hell if they didn't try to put a stop to this. I'm not saying its going to work but its obviously expected.
maybe i didn't make it clear...as an AC casino, instead of trying to find a loophole to not allow a competitor into the market, you should try to make a product that can actually compete with the competitor's. This is how an open market works. If the competitor (pokerstars) is shut out, then the AC casinos will most likely put out a ****ty product because their is no need to have a good one because there is no competition

as a consumer, i want several companies competing for the top spot...i don't want it handed to one company because another one is shut out due to a technicality
Gags30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 05:53 PM   #8
journeyman
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 287
Re: NJ online poker legislation (passed)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gags30 View Post
maybe i didn't make it clear...as an AC casino, instead of trying to find a loophole to not allow a competitor into the market, you should try to make a product that can actually compete with the competitor's. This is how an open market works. If the competitor (pokerstars) is shut out, then the AC casinos will most likely put out a ****ty product because their is no need to have a good one because there is no competition

as a consumer, i want several companies competing for the top spot...i don't want it handed to one company because another one is shut out due to a technicality
I hear your concerns regarding an open market and I believe there will be once all the sites get up and running. The problem is that PS had an unfair advantage (some people might argue this point) since they were operating in the "grey" area of the law for all those years. Pokerstars has no born right to the NJ online poker market. That is up to the state of NJ, not even the DOJ will be able to come in and save the day (unless there are back office dealings). My guess is that the won't be up and running when the first cards are dealt but might be able to come in a couple of years down the line once all the NJ casino's feel like they have a strong enough brand to compete against them.
mag8500 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 06:17 PM   #9
veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,014
Re: NJ online poker legislation (passed)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mag8500 View Post
I hear your concerns regarding an open market and I believe there will be once all the sites get up and running. The problem is that PS had an unfair advantage (some people might argue this point) since they were operating in the "grey" area of the law for all those years. Pokerstars has no born right to the NJ online poker market. That is up to the state of NJ, not even the DOJ will be able to come in and save the day (unless there are back office dealings). My guess is that the won't be up and running when the first cards are dealt but might be able to come in a couple of years down the line once all the NJ casino's feel like they have a strong enough brand to compete against them.
lol, how do they have an unfair advantage? borgata has partnereed with party, who has been around for quite some time...caesars is partnering with 888...how ist hat not the same advantage that stars has?
Gags30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 06:33 PM   #10
adept
 
SamuraiPlaya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,057
Re: Segregation of players based on skill - US Online Poker

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gags30 View Post
caesars def will have a big site, dont' get me wrong.

what makes you think stars has an 'uphill battle' who exactly are they battling? nj has already said they're welcoming stars with open arms and look forward to having such a great foreign company in the US
First time in my life I have considered moving to the Garden state
SamuraiPlaya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 06:36 PM   #11
Pooh-Bah
 
LastLife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,010
Re: Segregation of players based on skill - US Online Poker

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gags30 View Post
caesars def will have a big site, dont' get me wrong.

what makes you think stars has an 'uphill battle' who exactly are they battling? nj has already said they're welcoming stars with open arms and look forward to having such a great foreign company in the US
You have a source on this? Just today the AGA filed a brief saying PS shouldn't be allowed to purchase the Atlantic Club. The AGA represents Caesars(largest owner of casinos in AC) and the Borgata. That's half of AC. The other half is owned by Trump/Tropicana and even smaller companies. They most likely oppose PS buying the Atlantic Club just as much as the AGA does.

Pokerstars has no friends in the world right now. Not only that, they have people trying to **** on them every step of the way. As poker players we have a certain view of pokerstars. Sadly, US business interests don't feel the same, and the have to power to at the very least slow PS down.
LastLife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 07:17 PM   #12
veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,014
Re: Segregation of players based on skill - US Online Poker

Quote:
Originally Posted by LastLife View Post
You have a source on this? Just today the AGA filed a brief saying PS shouldn't be allowed to purchase the Atlantic Club. The AGA represents Caesars(largest owner of casinos in AC) and the Borgata. That's half of AC. The other half is owned by Trump/Tropicana and even smaller companies. They most likely oppose PS buying the Atlantic Club just as much as the AGA does.

Pokerstars has no friends in the world right now. Not only that, they have people trying to **** on them every step of the way. As poker players we have a certain view of pokerstars. Sadly, US business interests don't feel the same, and the have to power to at the very least slow PS down.
ya i saw the thing about the AGA right after i posted in this thread earlier...

anyway, here is one quote that i saw about welcoming pokerstars:

http://www.njsendems.com/release.asp?rid=4743
Gags30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 07:23 PM   #13
Pooh-Bah
 
LastLife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,010
Re: Segregation of players based on skill - US Online Poker

Lesniak is knee deep in this issue. He just wants every online gaming company to relocate to NJ, so that they are the(a) central hub.

I still think that PS has a decent chance, but US gaming interests are going to make them sweat it out. Even if everything goes right for PS, they could still be late to the party if NJ follows their own timeline.
LastLife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 07:47 PM   #14
journeyman
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 287
Neither of which have been in the US since 2006. Therefore ps has a 5 year advantage.
mag8500 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 08:08 PM   #15
journeyman
 
kjonly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: In your mind!
Posts: 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gags30 View Post
maybe i didn't make it clear...as an AC casino, instead of trying to find a loophole to not allow a competitor into the market, you should try to make a product that can actually compete with the competitor's. This is how an open market works. If the competitor (pokerstars) is shut out, then the AC casinos will most likely put out a ****ty product because their is no need to have a good one because there is no competition

as a consumer, i want several companies competing for the top spot...i don't want it handed to one company because another one is shut out due to a technicality
You are absolutely right, from a consumer's perspective. But a businesses' sole purpose is to make money. I think everyone pretty much saw at least a challenge coming.
kjonly is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive