Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Washington Internet Poker Initiative Washington Internet Poker Initiative

09-24-2014 , 03:31 PM
Thanks for the breakdown. I would be down to get more active in WA online poker efforts, but I don't live there anymore. I do actively do those things in FL.

It's a frustratingly slow and complex process, but I will stay with it for as long as it takes. Keep up the good work in WA. I would seriously look at moving back there if online poker returned.
Washington Internet Poker Initiative Quote
09-29-2014 , 02:34 PM
I shared my takeaways from meeting with Rep. Hurst on OPR - http://www.onlinepokerreport.com/139...hington-state/

I have a meeting with a potential bill sponsor in Olympia next month. Players in the area interested in meeting with me and perhaps attending that legislative meeting feel free to drop me a message
Washington Internet Poker Initiative Quote
10-11-2014 , 01:24 AM
You are doing the Lord's Work, Curt. Thank you.
Washington Internet Poker Initiative Quote
10-11-2014 , 11:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by curtinsea
Its not enough that the players want it, there has to be someone who wants to offer online poker to Washington State players. So that is the next hurdle. It's no longer a question of how bad WA players want to play on Pokerstars and other sites, it is a question of how bad those operators want to serve us.
Believe it or not, this is the biggest hurdle we now face.
Washington Internet Poker Initiative Quote
10-11-2014 , 01:46 PM
Daily fantasy sports sites might be a better ally on that front
Washington Internet Poker Initiative Quote
10-24-2014 , 03:43 PM
I fear we are at the end of the line . . .

The question was raised "who wants to offer online poker in Washington State?" by State Rep. Chris Hurst, and so far the answer appears to be 'nobody.'

It really doesn't matter how bad we want online poker back in our state if nobody wants to offer online poker to our players. The sites are not going to get a freeroll here. If they don't demonstrate a desire to access this market in a meaningful way, there is no reason at all for the legislature to even discuss creating such a market.

Players, we need to implore the sites to support our effort. We are, after all, working on their behalf, to create a market from which they will reap millions in profits each year. And yet, they are not helping.

We are so close, but without real support from the industry, this is the end. Turn your attention to the sites, implore them to support the players, as those players have supported them. Remind them we are here for them, they need to be here for us. This is their fight too. They have the money and the resources and the payoff at the end will be theirs.

So much of this fight is wasted effort trying convince people on the same side of the issue to step up and be heard.
Washington Internet Poker Initiative Quote
10-25-2014 , 11:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by curtinsea
I fear we are at the end of the line . . .

The question was raised "who wants to offer online poker in Washington State?" by State Rep. Chris Hurst, and so far the answer appears to be 'nobody.'

It really doesn't matter how bad we want online poker back in our state if nobody wants to offer online poker to our players. The sites are not going to get a freeroll here. If they don't demonstrate a desire to access this market in a meaningful way, there is no reason at all for the legislature to even discuss creating such a market.

Players, we need to implore the sites to support our effort. We are, after all, working on their behalf, to create a market from which they will reap millions in profits each year. And yet, they are not helping.

We are so close, but without real support from the industry, this is the end. Turn your attention to the sites, implore them to support the players, as those players have supported them. Remind them we are here for them, they need to be here for us. This is their fight too. They have the money and the resources and the payoff at the end will be theirs.

So much of this fight is wasted effort trying convince people on the same side of the issue to step up and be heard.
Why not direct our attention and efforts to the daily fantasy sites? Right now the big sites like Fanduel and Draftkings don't allow play in Washington State because of the same anti-poker law and daily fantasy doesn't have the stigma that online gambling has.

(You know, because fantasy is a game of skill...)

It's a potential ally on the same front, even if skinned differently.
Washington Internet Poker Initiative Quote
10-26-2014 , 03:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by boltyou
Why not direct our attention and efforts to the daily fantasy sites? Right now the big sites like Fanduel and Draftkings don't allow play in Washington State because of the same anti-poker law and daily fantasy doesn't have the stigma that online gambling has.

(You know, because fantasy is a game of skill...)

It's a potential ally on the same front, even if skinned differently.
That would be a completely different bill.

You must understand that a gambling activity must be authorized to be legal. It isn't a matter of 'if it isn't specifically illegal, then it is legal.' It is, in fact, the opposite (in WA State).

We are fighting for the big international poker sites' entry into this market. They need to be fighting with us. It is really that simple.
Washington Internet Poker Initiative Quote
10-27-2014 , 01:02 AM
There are no casinos in Washington that are interested in offering intrastate online poker?
Washington Internet Poker Initiative Quote
11-01-2014 , 11:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kowalski
There are no casinos in Washington that are interested in offering intrastate online poker?
I'm sure they would like to, but if they are only going to get a 20% revenue share of 20% market share of a $25million market, it isn't something they really need to press for.
Washington Internet Poker Initiative Quote
11-02-2014 , 10:50 PM
On Wednesday (10.29) I was down in Olympia to meet with State Representative Chris Reykdal (D-22nd). He is very much interested in our cause, and was a co-sponsor of HB1824 in 2013. His reply to our inquiries include "I’m on board, and I’m ready to sponsor or co-sponsor legislation," and this meeting was to present him with a full draft proposal.

The draft I presented him with (it's new, you can view it here) will next go to the Office of the Code Reviser, where it may have some changes made to it, to make sure it is consistent with the RCW.

Next, we need to drum up additional support. It's good to have both Dems and Reps on board, and I've made some good contacts with members of the House Committee we need to go through.

These next two months are crucial, the legislative session is short, and we will only have until mid-February to see it through committee and to a floor vote in the House. It is important that we have the support necessary so it can proceed swiftly through the process. Any excuse to table it will likely be the end of it for the year.

let your legislators know the issue is important to you. I still hear all to often "nobody in my district has raised this issue"

We'll be doing another e-mail and social media blitz this month. There are at least a dozen state reps who will support this measure, but we need more.
Washington Internet Poker Initiative Quote
11-02-2014 , 11:40 PM
Thanks for the great work! Are there resources available for those who want to contact their elected officials? Ie talking points etc?
Washington Internet Poker Initiative Quote
11-03-2014 , 12:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofball
Thanks for the great work! Are there resources available for those who want to contact their elected officials? Ie talking points etc?
I'll be posting more on this later in the week, after Tuesday's election
Washington Internet Poker Initiative Quote
11-07-2014 , 02:06 PM
There are a couple of races so far undecided, and one elected who died prior to the election, who will be replaced by appointment. But here is the 2015 Legislature, e-mails, Twitters, and click to tweet links

LD Party Pos. Legislator Twitter E-mail Address Tweet Link
1 D S Rosemary McAuliffe @R_McAuliffe rosemary.mcauliffe@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/e4X43ZJc
D H1 Derek Stanford @derekstanford derek.stanford@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/f34ZafPc
D H2 Luis Moscoso @lucho4 luis.moscoso@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/bZd6dp0A
2 R S Randi Becker @RandiLBecker randi.becker@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/Q56aC019
R H1 Graham Hunt @gr_hunt graham.hunt@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/129QG2an
R H2 JT Wilcox @jtwilcox111 jt.wilcox@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/p43g38f0
3 D S Andy Billig @Andybillig andy.billig@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/wBdd3T8g
D H1 Marcus Riccelli @marcusriccelli marcus.riccelli@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/T4dy30UD
D H2 Timm Ormsby timm.ormsby@leg.wa.gov
4 R S Mike Padden mike.padden@leg.wa.gov
R H1 Bob McClasin
R H2 Matt Shea @repmattshea matt.shea@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/cly6sP4t
5 R S Mark Mullet mark.mullet@leg.wa.gov
R H1 Jay Rodne jay.rodne@leg.wa.gov
R H2 Chad Magendanz @magendanz chad.magendanz@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/PeaN5dIf
6 R S Michael Baumgartner @senbaumgartner michael.baumgartner@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/J16gT5nX
R H1 Kevin Parker @kevincparker kevin.parker@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/69JOb6TU
R H2 Jeff Holy jeff.holy@leg.wa.gov
7 R S Brian Dansel brian.dansel@leg.wa.gov
R H1 Shelly Short shelly.short@leg.wa.gov
R H2 Joel Kretz @joelkretz joel.kretz@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/e7HdapCe
8 R S Sharon Brown @sharonbrownWA sharon.brown@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/kyjcJ78V
R H1 Brad Klippert @bradklippert brad.klippert@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/B91a2N96
R H2 Larry Haler @larryhaler larry.haler@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/UfASGJgd
9 R S Mark Schoesler mark.schoesler@leg.wa.gov
R H1 Susan Fagan @susanfagan susan.fagan@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/cfe40A4f
R H2 Joe Schmick joe.schmick@leg.wa.gov
10 R S Barbara Bailey @BarbBaileyWA10 barbara.bailey@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/a35M220s
R H1 Norma Smith norma.smith@leg.wa.gov
R H2 Dave Hayes @RepDaveHayes dave.hayes@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/28gtOziG
11 D S Bob Hasegawa @bobhasegawa bob.hasegawa@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/b6vcdFge
D H1 Zack Hudgins zack.hudgins@leg.wa.gov
D H2 Steve Bergquist @steve4house steve.bergquist@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/y93e0nih
12 R S Linda Evans Parlette linda.parlette@leg.wa.gov
R H1 Cary Condotta @CaryCondotta cary.condotta@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/MHKzURoY
R H2 Brad Hawkins brad.hawkins@leg.wa.gov
13 R S Judith Warnick @judithwarnick judy.warnick@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/dtKdI75q
R H1 Tom Dent
R H2 Matt Manweller @mattmanweller matt.manweller@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/c4MY4TH2
14 R S Curtis King curtis.king@leg.wa.gov
R H1 Norm Johnson norm.johnson@leg.wa.gov
R H2 Gina R. McCabe
15 R S Jim Honeyford @jimhoneyford jim.honeyford@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/n4aPR9t1
R H1 Bruce Chandler @votechandler bruce.chandler@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/jbcyZ5c6
R H2 David Taylor @Rep_Taylor david.taylor@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/U8kOKede
16 R S Mike Hewitt mike.hewitt@leg.wa.gov
R H1 Maureen Walsh @repmaureenwalsh maureen.walsh@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/tXLy91d7
R H2 Terry Nealey terry.nealey@leg.wa.gov
17 R S Don Benton @Bentonforsenate don.benton@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/6e6cVuxh
R H1 Lynda Wilson @Lynda_dw http://spredd.it/1wq8ebKd
R H2 Paul Harris paul.harris@leg.wa.gov Supports
18 R S Ann Rivers ann.rivers@leg.wa.gov
R H1 Brandon Vick @BrandonVick brandon.vick@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/bLaf97MC
R H2 Liz Pike liz.pike@leg.wa.gov
19 D S Brian Hatfield brian.hatfield@leg.wa.gov
D H1 Dean Takko dean.takko@leg.wa.gov
D H2 Brian Blake brian.blake@leg.wa.gov
20 R S John Braun @SenatorBraun john.braun@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/zaK198I6
R H1 Richard DeBolt @RepDeBolt richard.debolt@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/9ffYU09a
R H2 Ed Orcutt ed.orcutt@leg.wa.gov
21 D S Marko Liias @SenMarkoLiias marko.liias@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/W9NxeXyd
D H1 Strom Peterson
D H2 Lillian Ortiz-Self @electlillian lillian.ortiz-self@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/p7G77e24
22 D S Karen Fraser karen.fraser@leg.wa.gov
D H1 Chris Reykdal @chrisreykdal chris.reykdal@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/5Zry2xw0
D H2 Sam Hunt sam.hunt@leg.wa.gov
23 D S Christine Rolfes christine.rolfes@leg.wa.gov
D H1 Sherry Appleton sherry.appleton@leg.wa.gov Supports
D H2 Drew Hansen @repdrewhansen drew.hansen@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/nfLVcStc
24 D S James Hargrove jim.hargrove@leg.wa.gov
D H1 Kevin Van De Wege @kevinvandewege kevin.vandewege@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/P19nmBXS
D H2 Steve Tharinger @stevetharinger steve.tharinger@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/zRv802Na
25 D S Bruce Dameier bruce.dammeier@leg.wa.gov
R H1 Melanie Stambaugh @votestambaugh http://spredd.it/Bqz4ba99
R H2 Hans Zeiger @hanszeiger hans.zeiger@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/7W4583FO
26 R S Jan Angel @janangel4senate jan.angel@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/du4azYeV
R H1 Jesse Young
R H2 Michelle Caldier too close
D H2 Larry Seaquist to call larry.seaquist@leg.wa.gov
27 R S Jeannie Darneille @darneille27 j.darneille@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/q8hZ1E3G
D H1 Laurie Jinkins @lauriejinkins2 laurie.jinkins@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/5Cg45Lf5
D H2 Jake Fey jake.fey@leg.wa.gov
28 R S Steve O'Ban @steveoban steve.o'ban@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/egeccO7Z
R H1 Dick Muri @dickmuri dick.muri@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/Nav2b1f3
R H2 Paul Wagemann too close
D H2 Christine Kilduff to call
29 D S Steve Conway steve.conway@leg.wa.gov
D H1 David Sawyer david.sawyer@leg.wa.gov
D H2 Steve Kirby steve.kirby@leg.wa.gov
30 R S Mark Miloscia @markmiloscia http://spredd.it/25Duro02
R H1 Linda Kochmar @lindakochmar linda.kochmar@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/c9GdXdIv
D H2 Roger Freeman TBA
31 R S Pam Roach @pamroach1 pam.roach@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/j01rv8H4
R H1 Drew Stokesbary @stokesbary http://spredd.it/S28dgn4U
D H2 Chris Hurst christopher.hurst@leg.wa.gov Open minded
32 D S Maralyn Chase @mchaseforsenate maralyn.chase@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/J6232H8S
D H1 Cindy Ryu cindy.ryu@leg.wa.gov
D H2 Ruth Kagi ruth.kagi@leg.wa.gov
33 D S Karen Keiser @karenkeiser1 karen.keiser@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/Ta91CbhG
D H1 Tina Orwall @tinaorwall tina.orwall@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/OFwe05U7
D H2 Mia Su-Ling Gregerson mia.gregerson@leg.wa.gov
34 D S Sharon Nelson sharon.nelson@leg.wa.gov
D H1 Eileen Cody eileen.cody@leg.wa.gov
D H2 Joe Fitzgibbon @joefitzgibbon joe.fitzgibbon@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/OC7cwb5e
D S Tim Sheldon Timothy.Sheldon@leg.wa.gov
D h1 Kathy Haigh too close kathy.haigh@leg.wa.gov Supports
R H1 Dan Griffey to call
R H2 Drew MacEwen @Drewmacewen drew.macewen@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/kfWhbFcc
36 D S Jeanne Kohl-Welles @repjkohlwelles jeanne.kohl-welles@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/KWkccOjR
D H1 Reuven Carlyle @reuvencarlyle reuven.carlyle@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/bYDHlq28
D H2 Gael Tarleton @gaeltarleton gael.tarleton@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/f72EjBGo
37 D S Pramila Jayapal @pramilaj http://spredd.it/zc2d48UL
D H1 Sharon Tomiko Santos sharontomiko.santos@leg.wa.gov
D H2 Eric pettigrew @pettigrew_e eric.pettigrew@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/A7fa1nFm
38 D S John McCoy john.mccoy@leg.wa.gov
D H1 June Robinson @gruberobinson june.robinson@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/atNlI2fh
D H2 Mike Sells mike.sells@leg.wa.gov
39 R S Kirk Pearson kirk.pearson@leg.wa.gov
R H1 Dan Kristiansen dan.kristiansen@leg.wa.gov
R H2 Elizabeth Scott @Escottwa elizabeth.scott@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/zkaSI971
40 D S Kevin Ranker @kevinranker kevin.ranker@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/fXU98d59
D H1 Kristine Lytton @kristinelytton kristine.lytton@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/bd27cR7F
D H2 Jeff Morris @TheRostrum morris.jeff@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/x7BT9myE
41 R S Steve Litzow @stevelitzow steve.litzow@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/bUsfmOKg
D H1 Tana Senn @tanasenn tana.senn@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/xn95Qydq
D H2 Judy Clibborn judy.clibborn@leg.wa.gov
42 R S Doug Ericksen doug.ericksen@leg.wa.gov
R h1 Luanne VanWerven @LuanneVanWerven http://spredd.it/gfaniu0E
R H2 Vincent Buys @VincentBuys vincent.buys@leg.wa.gov Supports
43 D S Jamie Pedersen jamie.pedersen@leg.wa.gov
D H1 Brady Walkinshaw @BradyWalkinshaw brady.walkinshaw@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/XTazn9aR
D H2 Frank Chopp @FrankChopp frank.chopp@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/0be03EzP
44 D S Steve Hobbs @electhobbs steve.hobbs@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/fzlaxG73
D H1 Hans Dunshee hans.dunshee@leg.wa.gov Not against
R H2 Mark Harmsworth @markharm http://spredd.it/t4osbgeb
R S Andy Hill @SenatorAndyHill andy.hill@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/OH7uxr5c
D H1 Roger Goodman @RepGoodman roger.goodman@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/fVAbaS9c
D H2 Larry Springer @RepSpringer larry.springer@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/N54Pzix5
46 D S David Frockt @dsfrockt david.frockt@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/IcO9LzGV
D H1 Gerry Pollet @GerryPollet gerry.pollet@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/tabUM1Lf
D H2 Jessyn Farrel jessyn.farrell@leg.wa.gov
47 R S Joe Fain @SenatorFain joe.fain@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/c7dxtdO8
R H1 Mark Hargrove @markhargrove mark.hargrove@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/u3xG7f49
D H2 Pat Sullivan pat.sullivan@leg.wa.gov
48 D S Cyrus Habib @cyrushabib cyrus.habib@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/H1luq6s5
D H1 Ross Hunter @Rosshunter ross.hunter@leg.wa.gov http://spredd.it/vqJpPdYQ
D H2 Joan McBride
D S Annette Cleaveland annette.cleveland@leg.wa.gov
49 D H1 Sharon Wylie sharon.wylie@leg.wa.gov
D h2 Jim Moeller @jimmoeller jim.moeller@leg.wa.gov
Washington Internet Poker Initiative Quote
11-07-2014 , 02:11 PM
As for talking points, I created this document when I was preparing for my meeting with Rep. Chris Hurst. It covers the why and the how. You can use all or any part of it in preparing e-mails to your legislators.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/239191641/...uld-We-and-How
Washington Internet Poker Initiative Quote
11-07-2014 , 03:12 PM
Our main supporters in the legislature are:

Jeff Morris (D-40th) and Bruce Chandler (R-15th) both voted against SSB6613 (2006), which gave us the current felony prohibition.

Paul Harris (R-17th) of course, who sponsored HB 1824 (2013). Also cosponsors on that bill were Chris Reykdal (D-22nd), Sherry Appleton (D-23rd), who I have corresponded with on this issue and are supportive; Ross Hunter (D-48th), Joe Fitzgibbon (D-34th), and Brandon Vick (R-18th), who is/was on the GAO Committee.

I got a message from Harris last week. He said he would look into this again, but it needed broader support. His proposal in 2014 was really a non-starter. What we are proposing is fairly different, and better serves local interests. I think it has a better chance of gaining support from the stakeholders here.

I've gotten public support from Vincent Buys (R-42nd); my own Rep. Mark Hargrove (R-47th) and I have talked about this issue often. He has indicated support. I've talked at length with Matt Shea (R-4th) as well. Also on the GAO Committee, I believe he will support this. And Matt Manweller (R-13th) has indicated an interest in sponsoring or cosponsoring a bill.
Washington Internet Poker Initiative Quote
11-07-2014 , 11:34 PM
I'd like to send a few e-mails to my reps. Thanks for all your efforts curtins. Perhaps you could give some cliffs on the draft that you posted? If you could post a PPA style e-mail I could copy and paste that would be great as well.

If not I'll just e-mail my reps a few sentences saying I support regulating online poker in Washington and am very opposed to the current Class C felony penalty for players.

Edit: I tweeted my state reps in 43rd district

Last edited by andr3w321; 11-07-2014 at 11:46 PM.
Washington Internet Poker Initiative Quote
11-08-2014 , 01:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by andr3w321
I'd like to send a few e-mails to my reps. Thanks for all your efforts curtins. Perhaps you could give some cliffs on the draft that you posted? If you could post a PPA style e-mail I could copy and paste that would be great as well.

If not I'll just e-mail my reps a few sentences saying I support regulating online poker in Washington and am very opposed to the current Class C felony penalty for players.

Edit: I tweeted my state reps in 43rd district
I typed up a letter on Google Docs, you can download it and insert your legislators' name(s) and add your own at the bottom. Or you can copy/paste the text.

There are valuable links that help convey the message, so it would be worth making sure they are included

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...it?usp=sharing
Washington Internet Poker Initiative Quote
11-19-2014 , 01:54 PM
Te Recreational Gaming Association, the trade group for non-tribal card rooms in Washington State, have asked me down to discuss our proposed legislation and its implications. This will be a big step forward, as gaining the support of the local card rooms is important to our success.

Card room revenue peaked in 2005, and has steadily declined since. That happens to coincide with the prohibition of online poker in 2006. Can we prove cause and effect? I don't know, but I sure am going to point out the obvious fact that the poker boom effectively ended in 2006 because of legislation like that passed in our state, and what was rapid growth in card room revenues is now decline.

Washington Internet Poker Initiative Quote
11-19-2014 , 03:14 PM
^ Fantastic! Give 'em hell, Curt!
Washington Internet Poker Initiative Quote
11-19-2014 , 04:32 PM
Very nice!

I moved out of WA because of the felony ban, and I have heard of many people doing the same. I mostly played online, but I made it to Tulalip about every other week for some live poker. Casino WA poker lost 100% of my business due to the online law.
Washington Internet Poker Initiative Quote
11-20-2014 , 10:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by curtinsea
Game, Set, Match

This endless debate over skill in poker is so irrelevant. We cannot win the legality battle this way. As long as the turn of a card can determine the outcome of a single event, it is going to meet the statutory definition of gambling. We have to change the statutes so they authorize internet poker.

In most jurisdictions, gambling activities are authorized on a game by game basis. Exclusions for fantasy sports are the result of lobbying, something that the poker community continues to resist doing with all their might, preferring instead to have meaningless debates on poker forums, behind veils of made up identities.

BTW, there are five states I know of that fantasy sports are not legal, mine included.
do not want to derail to much but why is the state of Washington so Anal about anything remotely related to internet gambling?.... They have by far the harshest laws in the country. Does not make sense, it is not like they are a bible belt state or extremely conservative.
Washington Internet Poker Initiative Quote
11-20-2014 , 01:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by njpokerplayer24
do not want to derail to much but why is the state of Washington so Anal about anything remotely related to internet gambling?.... They have by far the harshest laws in the country. Does not make sense, it is not like they are a bible belt state or extremely conservative.
Not a derail at all, happy to address this, as it is important to note, and something I think is often misunderstood.

It is a common fallacy I see often repeated that, when it comes to online poker, Dems are good, Republicans are bad. That simply isn't the case.

While there are ultra conservatives with a moral objection to gambling in many places, there are just as many, if not more, nanny state Democrats, who in their own arrogance think they know what is best for you, and thus need to protect you from gambling. Internet poker straddles these groups, and that is what makes the fight tough.

While many of you could name some Republicans who are against online poker, I doubt you could name a Democrat who was for it. The law here in Washington, that as you described has the harshest player penalty of any in the nation, was authored by a Democrat, hustled through a legislature with Democrat majorities in both chambers, and signed by a Governor who was also a Democrat. Yes, the bluest of blue states has given players the blues.

The good news? We have some support on both sides of the aisle. I believe I have a sponsor who is on the left. This will be helpful, as the Dems control the State House and therefore the committees. We need the committee chair to give a bill a hearing. I met with that committee chair, and he was reasonable and open minded, but didn't promise me a hearing.

I have some support from the Republicans on that committee. That will also be helpful. Of the entire legislature going into the next session, there is more support on the right than there is on the left. It's an issue of freedom for Republicans who care about that.

So when you think about the politics of internet poker, think beyond your personal party bias, because there are those for and against our cause on both sides of the aisle, and most of the action, both for and against, is on the right side of the aisle.
Washington Internet Poker Initiative Quote
12-05-2014 , 09:53 PM
I have a tease, just short of an official announcement. I have a state representative, one who has cosponsored several bills on this issue in the last few years, who is going to introduce the bill in the next session. She has sent my draft over to the Code Reviser's office, and as that process is completed, we will have an actual bill draft.

Watch for an official announcement in the next couple of weeks. The legislative session begins on January 12th. We need to be ready to mobilize quickly, if/when we get a hearing, we will have probably only 1 week's notice. I'm working on lining up folks to appear, among them players and industry reps.

If you are interested in appearing before the committee on behalf of this bill, reach out to me asap.

curtis@ipokerinitiative.com
Washington Internet Poker Initiative Quote
12-06-2014 , 03:26 AM
Great work man.

Imagine if we had a curtin[every state]...
Washington Internet Poker Initiative Quote

      
m