Well, the hearing is for ~Barton's bill, right? It seemed that the hearing was a "pony and dog show" (whatever numerous people, including C.Krafcik, have called it) - an exhibition for general public. It's thought that the only way for iPoker to become anything of substance is via H. Reid, so perhaps the third one isn't necessary (please, please, please)???
Although:
Quote:
Originally Posted by sluggger5x
Frank sounds pretty firm that there won't be ipoker attached to the taxes next month. Interesting.
Need more info - subscr. required.