Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsGambool
I dont remember the NJ bill having an automatic Federal opt-out, so the two arent exclusive.
NJ has nearly as many people as Sweden, which IIRC has viable i-poker. If NJ can have viable i-poker, should they automatically wait for a Federal bill that may never come? Especially if they could opt-in to that if intrastate doesnt work for them?
my apologies, i was not privy to the federal opt-in option. that absolutely makes it much more palatable.
however i'm still very wary of intrastate ipoker beyond opting out of federal playerpools, because it seems that (imo) it'll be much easier for states to change (raise) the taxing scheme as time goes on.
i really don't want my livelihood in the hands of some short-sighted bureaucrat or ignorant politician when the intrastate system comes up for renewal and the schools are short 200 mil on the budget or something. i mean i'm looking at the california bill and that's where they're STARTING...