Quote:
Originally Posted by antneye
How does this matter? FT floating people credit becomes FT's liability. You simply offset peoples balances by the debits they owe. In the absence of knowing the debit owed you pay balances.
This is not rocket science.
You really don't see what's wrong with this?
Player A plays on credit, loses $1000; he leaves losing nothing.
Player B plays on credit, wins $1000; pays off his credit can collects his $1000.
In short, a large number of American players were freerolling FTP.
In essence, there were players at the same table playing with real money and players playing with play money. Obviously, the players playing with play money shouldn't be able to win real money.
This is the crux of the net deposits vs. balances issue. Since the money on the table was tainted, how can you legitimize the games?