Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron!n
I think he can get it in far lighter than just with a flush or better, but he obviously can have a flush yes.
Against
QQ,22,KcJ,AcJ,AcK,Ac5c,Ac4c,Ac3c,AcT,AcQ
We're above 50% and I don't think that's an unreasonable range, even left out some hands that he might also get in like KcQx and I've not even counted for the WTF-factor.
I would raise in all situations on flop that would allow me to.
This is a very interesting discussion so I'd like to elaborate a bit on this one and add some numbers.
If you take into account all the Acx and Kcx hands they may have, indeed we will be ahead a good part of the time. Actually, even the majority of the time against the average Villain.
That said, I think there are a few different cases to consider because the opponent's range will be slightly different:
1) We check-raise the flop.
The problem I have with this option is that Villains often won't c-bet a monotone flop if they didn't hit it. This flop is more favourable for the caller rather than the preflop raiser. With drawing hands (KJ, AK, J9) and even made hands (weak Q, JJ, middle pairs), they may well check behind and get a free card. In some of these cases, this means we won't be charging them when we are ahead and they may well beat us with the free card. Since we are indeed ahead of everything but made flushes and QQ, donking makes more sense to me. It makes even more sense if we are planning to stack off on this flop because then we don't fear being raised.
If we check, Villain bets and we go for the check-raise I guess it all depends on Villain's abilities. First, it depends on how tight they are preflop. In this case, the tighter the better for us because there are some flushes that they will never have 76, 65, 54, 43. On the other hand, the looser (fishier) post flop the better, because then we'll get value from more drawing or otherwise speculative hands.
I think an average Villain's (not a complete fish but not a great player either) continuation range facing a flop check-raise will probably be something like:
QQ+, JcJx, 22, AQ, AcKx, AxKc, AcJx, AcTx, KcQx, KcJx, KcT, QdJc, QT, Ac9c-Ac3c, Kc9c, Jc9c, 9c8c, 8c7c, 7c6c, 6c5c, 5c4c, 4c3c
We are well ahead of this range but the better the player the less speculative hands they'll call with. A better player post will probably call with KK+ (with the club), QQ, 22, QT and made flushes. Against this range we have 48% equity which is roughly a coin flip so the decision to stack off in not that terrible either but is it worth it?
2) We bet and get raised.
This is a bit different because Villain's range is way narrower. Unless Villain is a complete fish, they wouldn't raise hands other than sets, two pair or made flushes. This is excluding the occasional min-raise probe bet to check if you have the flush. So Villain's range when they raise our flop bet is more similar to the latter where we have about 48% equity. In this case, is it still worth re-raise shoving?
Note that in all cases, if we are facing fish / calling stations then definitely we should be trying to gii on the flop one way or the other. Fish will call much lighter with worse holdings and despite them having more random flushes (92s kind of hand) it will still be profitable in the long run.