Hello everyone.

First of all, I'd like to apologize in advance as I don't know whether this is the best category for this thread. Now, to the point.

I just finished watching Daniel's latest video and I really can't take the following thought out of my head. I follow Daniel's thought process until the River, until the point he says that "when he checks [the river] you got to eliminate all the hands that maybe you thought he was floating with" because, as he says, "because he didn't bet [the river] we can rule out the idea that he has these goofy hands like K-J or K-Q"... Now, here's what I can't understand: why the fact that Phil Ivey didn't bet the river makes us rule out his floating hands, like K-J, K-Q or pocket pairs? I mean... If he did bet the River, it would probably be an easy call. But if he checked-raised, well... Now we are in a tough spot and definitely think folding our A-Q as an option.

U didn't even tell us the hand history, how do we know what you are talking about?

Well... Wouldn't it be better if you went to YouTube, watched the video and learned the hand's history from Daniel himself?