Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
One pair vs min shove on the river One pair vs min shove on the river

08-26-2015 , 10:48 PM
    WPN, $0.10/$0.25 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 4 Players
    Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite. View Hand #37086580

    Hero (SB): $52.89 (211.6 bb)
    BB: $25 (100 bb)
    CO: $31.11 (124.4 bb)
    BTN: $33.64 (134.6 bb)

    Preflop: Hero is SB with K Q
    CO folds, BTN raises to $0.50, Hero raises to $2, BB folds, BTN calls $1.50

    Flop: ($4.25) T 2 4 (2 players)
    Hero bets $2.50, BTN calls $2.50

    Turn: ($9.25) Q (2 players)
    Hero bets $6.50, BTN calls $6.50

    River: ($22.25) 7 (2 players)
    Hero bets $10.57, BTN raises to $22.64 and is all-in, Hero ?

    Spoiler:
    Results: $67.53 pot ($2 rake)
    Final Board: T 2 4 Q 7
    Hero showed K Q and won $65.53 ($31.89 net)
    BTN showed K J and lost (-$33.64 net)



    Get the Flash Player to use the Hold'em Manager Replayer.
    One pair vs min shove on the river Quote
    08-27-2015 , 02:15 PM
    1. Hands at this level should be posted here:

    http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/69...-stakes-pl-nl/

    2. Don't post results.

    3. Stats/reads/info on opponent? History with him?

    4. You're almost always beat. You only need to win about 15% of the time to call. I don't really think you win that often though. I think its is a fold even with odds that good, but it is hard to fold with such good odds and needing to win so infrequently. What you could do is either (a) maybe bet even smaller on the river (though you may not really want to if he will call the larger bet with TX,JJ,99 hands); or (b) bet the turn larger, like 7.5 or 8 and then shove the river yourself. Depending on the opponent maybe the river shouldn't be a bet. It is a bad river card.
    One pair vs min shove on the river Quote
    08-27-2015 , 05:57 PM
    yeah sorry for posting here,I just wanted some good advice from more experienced players. I don't feel I always get good advice in the microstakes forum



    yeah this villain was very laggy and would float often he was playing 38/25/0 over 150 hands. I felt at the time he could have had some floated overs that turned some kind of draw on the turn . I also had the Qd which took some diamond combos out and getting almost 5 to 1 I made a crying river call which I felt most times I'm beat ..

    as for the river I felt that he would bluff his whole range on that river so I bet as a type of blocking bet.

    in the future do you think its wrong to add those type of floated hands when doing a hand analysis? against a tag or passive I'm check folding river
    One pair vs min shove on the river Quote
    08-27-2015 , 05:59 PM
    I also felt that he would raise any flopped set on the turn .. which I honestly don't know if that's the correct thought process
    One pair vs min shove on the river Quote
    09-01-2015 , 09:58 AM
    Tell us why did you 3bet him preflop ?
    Flop I prefer a c/f I think you don't have enough fold equity. He'll never fold something that beat you, almost all the range that call your 3 bet pf will call your cbet.
    As played turn I'm ok and river it's a clear fold, a raise from villain is almost never a bluff there.
    One pair vs min shove on the river Quote

          
    m