Not that it's remotely likely to come up, but just think it's good to have the tennis rules posted in the thread somewhere. From Pinnacle:
Quote:
Head to Head Matchups:
One full set must be completed for Money Line wagers to stand. If less than 1 set is completed, all Money Line wagers will be considered void.
Example: Federer 6-3, 2-0 (Roddick retired due to injury). All wagers stand. Federer declared the winner while Roddick is deemed the loser.
Example: Federer 2-0 (Roddick retired due to injury). All wagers considered void.
If we offer Player A (-1.5 sets or -2.5 sets ) vs Player B (+1.5 sets or +2.5 sets) the match must be completed else wagers on that line are void.
Just the kind of thing that crosses my mind whenever I lay 40:1 on a tennis match.