Quote:
Originally Posted by homeboy604
(running bad too during that time.)
prolly more variance than you might think. being a decent winner to being a breakeven rb whore doesnt happen overnight. + i think you are very decent. played you on 3/6 sometimes when i was still playing as bballtimmy. you told me how horrible i was. i got better since
Quote:
Originally Posted by raze
It seems like we all have very different ideas of what constitutes a 'good' site or table. Can you guys who love/hate iPoker give some details on your criteria for conversations' sake?
i think this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexB81
I think the difference is regulars on ipoker are more exploitable (read worst) than regulars on other websites even if they are so many.
sums it up pretty well. but its the same at pretty much every site tbh. be it party or whatever. this is not an ipoker phenomenon. there simply are a ****ton of marginal winners at every level that are horrible compared to the good regs at the same level.
i stopped trying to move up to nl600 or nl1k but beat the hell out of nl400.
there arent a ton of real fish but if youre not a by the book tagfish idiot theres a ton of value there.
i regularly got beaten up by some of the nl600/1k players but totally own nl400.
you have up to nl200. then you have nl400. and then you have nl600+ (def differences btw nl1k and 5k as well ofc but i dont know about these first hand ldo)
nl400 is pretty much the cutoff limit that has a decent amount of recreational/bad fish and on the other hand for this very reason have a lot of idiot bad regs. they are marginal winners because of the fish but lose to a lot of other regs.
at nl600+ everyone pretty much knows what they are doing and therefore the edges get supersmall. if the supply of real fish dries up this kills the games obv.
the cycle thing somebody mentioned definitely exists.
i havent checked ftp for a long time. i imagine tho that a lot of the "oh you guys have party we americans are so jealous" talk is utter bull****. they know that their games arent that bad but they arent that stupid to tell each and everyone that the games are good.
i know of two other sites that have decent traffic and have a fish to reg ratio thats basically heaven. ofc i wont tell you the names of the sites. why would i.
well that was a lot of blabber and i dont know about the state of the nl1k games at ipoker but i think everyone that has a distinct edge on the majority of the other regs at his limit should do well regardless of other factors.
2eazy you sound like a huge douche btw but for a player as good as you are there will prolly never be a time that you will find games to be unbeatable. congratulations.