Originally Posted by AlexB81
everyone keeps saying ftp and stars medium stakes more soft and maybe it s true but consider on ipoker you have more "bonus" and races...on stars if you play 6max you can get supernova after some months but elite is impossible.
Being supernova I think you get around 30% rakeback and if you play 70k hands\month you should receive like 3 milestone in 1 year tell me if i m wrong.
Then regulars on stars even if there are less seems stronger.
Anyone tried T6 or everest or hollywood or prima how is it situation there?
I thought the general consensus is that stars is the toughest, then ftp. But i think this view is maybe twisted a little because a large percentage of 2p2 are american, and play on these sites. Ie "we all play there, so its the hardest" In reality there i think there are tons of donks out numbering the good players so it evens out
I have played around 500k hands on both sites and ipoker, and i honestly cannot decide, but im up relatively more on stars and ftp than ipoker, and i probably put this down to better game selection availability at 2/4 and 3/6.
But no way is ipoker a soft touch imo. If i could handle playing on the software, i would be off to partypoker to be honest but i hate it
froma pure traffic point of view, try here http://www.pokerscout.com/