Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
***The OFFICIAL 2013 Stars Regulars Thread*** ***The OFFICIAL 2013 Stars Regulars Thread***

01-01-2014 , 07:10 AM
Hi all, happy new year and all that....

Thought I would ask here, as you guys/girls will probs have a better idea than most.

Was just wondering if anyone has a 'rough' idea of how many hands I will need to play at 25nl and 50nl zoom, in order to make 2000 vpp's per week? And is it realistic to expect to achieve this.

Last edited by Tw1stedLog1c; 01-01-2014 at 07:16 AM.
01-01-2014 , 11:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tw1stedLog1c
Hi all, happy new year and all that....

Thought I would ask here, as you guys/girls will probs have a better idea than most.

Was just wondering if anyone has a 'rough' idea of how many hands I will need to play at 25nl and 50nl zoom, in order to make 2000 vpp's per week? And is it realistic to expect to achieve this.
why don't you just play a few hours and see for yourself...
also this is msnl so most of the guys who read here play higher.
your vpip/pfr/play style will mean your vpp/hand/hour will be a bit different..
nitty guys get more hands per hour but less vpp/hand.
2000 a week is very achievable though yes
01-01-2014 , 12:54 PM
Browse stars website, ithas vpp calculator. Use it.
01-01-2014 , 03:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OMGClayDol
why don't you just play a few hours and see for yourself...
also this is msnl so most of the guys who read here play higher.
your vpip/pfr/play style will mean your vpp/hand/hour will be a bit different..
nitty guys get more hands per hour but less vpp/hand.
2000 a week is very achievable though yes
Thanks for your reply. I probs am on the more nittier side of things when playing zoom. Anyways, I'll give it a go.
01-01-2014 , 03:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ninja666
Browse stars website, ithas vpp calculator. Use it.
Cheers, I did stumble upon the calculator after seeing another post related to vpp's and someone pointing the person who posted it, in the direction of the calculator. Must say though, the person who mentioned the calculator in that thread was a little less hostile about it than you seem to be? Maybe it's just how I read it, either way, thanks for your help.

      
m