***The OFFICIAL 2012 Stars Regulars Thread***

[MatthewRyan]

Originally Posted by cashy

in all the different rake change threads in the Internet Poker forum the 40bbers were reporting(crying like babies) huuuuuuuge VPP rate drops

[Bruut99]

Some SNE 40bbers said they were dropping 50%, does that mean they 'only' paid 90k rake, instead of 180k to receive like 110k in sne rewards, thus having above 100% rb?

[lima]

Originally Posted by Bruut99

Some SNE 40bbers said they were dropping 50%, does that mean they 'only' paid 90k rake, instead of 180k to receive like 110k in sne rewards, thus having above 100% rb?

Most probably. And everyone here went apes.hit on me when I said they were blatantly stealing.

[krolewicz]

i cannot see how its possible

[krmont22]

No one ever got more than 100pct rakeback on Stars other than the one day loophole on double vpp day. Trust in Stars' greed...they didn't allow 100pct+ rb. They have 50pct less VPPs now, so it takes a lot more hands to get to SNE. It's not a direct correlation between the percentage loss and rb percentage.

[terp]

it's a question of method. since your rake 'paid' differs under dealt, WC and WTA, it's conceivable that the system most favorable to you could register as giving you >100% under another measurement

[cashy]

Originally Posted by krmont22

No one ever got more than 100pct rakeback on Stars other than the one day loophole on double vpp day. Trust in Stars' greed...they didn't allow 100pct+ rb. They have 50pct less VPPs now, so it takes a lot more hands to get to SNE. It's not a direct correlation between the percentage loss and rb percentage.

not true
someone folding 100% of his hands preflop would certainly get more than 100% rakeback using the "dealt" method

it didnt make a difference to stars tho(assuming all the playes have the same vip level) because they were handing out the same VPPs nomatter what so a 100%+ rakeback player was leeching of other players at the table not stars

[krmont22]

Cashy,

It's true. You could do it. Let me rephrase. There was no possible way (or no one found it) to have greater than 100pct rakeback and net money. There definitely were some guys in the 80s, though.

[ISO]

I have't played for a few days and my hands +hud aren't importing/working for HEM1.

Any ideas?

[krolewicz]

stars had update that changed sth about HH, just go to HEM forums and u will find update w/o any problem

[TheBob]

Originally Posted by ISO

I have't played for a few days and my hands +hud aren't importing/working for HEM1.

Any ideas?

I'm having the same problem. Even with my hem updated and I can't get it to work.

[ISO]

ty krolewicz.

bob: Mine is working using 1.12.09

[TheBob]

Originally Posted by ISO

ty krolewicz.

bob: Mine is working using 1.12.09

*jealous*, im using the lagmachine that is hem 2 right now

[st0e]

hey there...i am willing to trade money on pokerstars for moneybookers...i`ve never traded here on 2+2 so i will do it through an escrow or i dunno how it is done. i`ve been playin stars for a while i will give sn on pm.
thank you.

[DonEdison]

Originally Posted by st0e

hey there...i am willing to trade money on pokerstars for moneybookers...i`ve never traded here on 2+2 so i will do it through an escrow or i dunno how it is done. i`ve been playin stars for a while i will give sn on pm.
thank you.

you should try ur luck in the xfer thread in highstakes nl section.