Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > No Limit Hold'em > Medium Stakes PL/NL

Notices

Medium Stakes PL/NL Discussions about medium stakes pot-limit and no-limit hold'em (2-4 to 5-10)

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-25-2012, 03:46 PM   #1156
stranger
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7
Re: ***The OFFICIAL 2012 Microgaming Regulars Thread***

http://www.pokerhandreplays.com/view.php/id/4398273

well at least i know hes not a bot,he actually said OH WOW after this

Last edited by randomas; 06-25-2012 at 04:15 PM. Reason: in b4 coolstorybro pics :)
randomas is offline  
Old 06-26-2012, 12:41 PM   #1157
enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 90
Re: ***The OFFICIAL 2012 Microgaming Regulars Thread***

Did receive a cashout from Dbet, so it seems that room doesn't have any liquidity problems like other rooms that were hit at June 1st
Gerasis is offline  
Old 06-26-2012, 02:25 PM   #1158
newbie
 
The72o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: in HU game /w UR $$$
Posts: 42
Re: ***The OFFICIAL 2012 Microgaming Regulars Thread***

Yeah, me too.
It took only 2 hours to cashout from Dbet
The72o is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 03:34 AM   #1159
centurion
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 193
Re: ***The OFFICIAL 2012 Microgaming Regulars Thread***

Without sounding like a douchebag, (maybe he is a v nice person irl idk) , but can anyone please tell me how the **** VO2max is rolled with how insanely bad and technically atrocious he plays, or am I missing something here? The guy can't lose!
torontoooo is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 04:06 AM   #1160
journeyman
 
UnderCover_Pro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Soulless Murderer-H4H
Posts: 237
Re: ***The OFFICIAL 2012 Microgaming Regulars Thread***

Quote:
Originally Posted by torontoooo View Post
Without sounding like a douchebag, (maybe he is a v nice person irl idk) , but can anyone please tell me how the **** VO2max is rolled with how insanely bad and technically atrocious he plays, or am I missing something here? The guy can't lose!
A few good 100k plus years a while ago has played as high as 50/100.
UnderCover_Pro is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 10:20 AM   #1161
centurion
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 191
Re: ***The OFFICIAL 2012 Microgaming Regulars Thread***

VO2max actually started on 100 NL a few months back and has grinded his way up. .
I have played A LOT with him the last few months at 100 and 200 nl.

Last edited by oldlove; 06-27-2012 at 10:27 AM.
oldlove is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 12:13 PM   #1162
journeyman
 
UnderCover_Pro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Soulless Murderer-H4H
Posts: 237
Re: ***The OFFICIAL 2012 Microgaming Regulars Thread***

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldlove View Post
VO2max actually started on 100 NL a few months back and has grinded his way up. .
I have played A LOT with him the last few months at 100 and 200 nl.
This Pro will never lie, tell storys, and only bluffs at the table.

Vo2 had a break from MG and returned at low mid stakes.
There are a few players left from the old ladbrokes/ Unibet MG lodden days
before network merges.Dvokinfinity is one.
100% this is correct he was one of the biggest winners on network around 2008/9.And was playing 50/100.
UnderCover_Pro is offline  
Old 06-28-2012, 05:47 PM   #1163
enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 99
Hey guys here's an article I wrote further explaining the situation with 5050 and Microgaming. Hopefully it gives you an idea about the politics going on behind the scenes:

http://www.igaming411.com/2012/06/25...and-5050poker/
KeysToTheCity is offline  
Old 06-28-2012, 07:07 PM   #1164
newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 17
Re: ***The OFFICIAL 2012 Microgaming Regulars Thread***

http://www.lga.org.mt/lga/content.aspx?id=328106 ...
Crazywhacko is offline  
Old 06-29-2012, 05:12 AM   #1165
adept
 
B1ingB1angB1aow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,129
Re: ***The OFFICIAL 2012 Microgaming Regulars Thread***

The last published accounts for 5050 Poker Holding AB show 1704 players who have played at least once in the last 3 months, with player balances of SEK 5.7m ($810k USD). The company’s Current Assets are listed at over SEK 7m. However, during liquidation, players rank no higher than other creditors, so if the company liquidates and the assets and liabilities do not match, then players may not get a proportion of their money back.

Article
B1ingB1angB1aow is offline  
Old 06-29-2012, 08:57 PM   #1166
stranger
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 12
Re: ***The OFFICIAL 2012 Microgaming Regulars Thread***

This network is just a joke. They changed their politic at the last time of the month as if there was only few rooms which offered illegal rb. But actually, there was rakeback on all rooms and way more than 30%. If Unibet and Ladbrokes want to be alone why they don't just leave microgaming or ask them directly to kick the small skins out instead of being hypocrite.
The trend isn't good for microgaming, they're loosing players which is normal, cause how can we trust them now?

Last edited by ben78; 06-29-2012 at 09:03 PM.
ben78 is offline  
Old 06-30-2012, 03:26 AM   #1167
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Sciolist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 12,788
Re: ***The OFFICIAL 2012 Microgaming Regulars Thread***

I don't think a site should complain if it broke network rules and got punished.

I also don't think that every skin offers > 30% rakeback. I guess it's POSSIBLE that some affiliates offer rakeback that they aren't allowed to without the site's knowledge, but that isn't the same thing.

If Ladbrokes and Unibet left Microgaming there'd be no recreational players left on it.
Sciolist is offline  
Old 06-30-2012, 07:08 AM   #1168
stranger
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 12
Re: ***The OFFICIAL 2012 Microgaming Regulars Thread***

A rule that wasn't respected by all rooms on prima and it's only the small ones which are punished. To have more than 30% rb you needed an affiliate. It wasn't some affiliates, trust me.

I would think the contrary, they would have more recreational players. Grinders go on smaller rooms to have better deals, bad players join bigger sites because they trust them and it's the only site they know in the network.

To put anonymous table, then, mostly turbo tables and finally zoom poker, it's definitely to get more recreational players. Now, they get rid of the smaller skins to avoid better deals than what Ladbrokes and Unibet offer, they make sure everybody goes on their site. They will lose regs it's sure cause I don't see how they could stay on this site now that the VIP program is so low. I think they want to improve the ratio recreational player/reg.

Last edited by ben78; 06-30-2012 at 07:13 AM.
ben78 is offline  
Old 06-30-2012, 09:00 AM   #1169
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Sciolist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 12,788
Re: ***The OFFICIAL 2012 Microgaming Regulars Thread***

Quote:
Originally Posted by ben78 View Post
A rule that wasn't respected by all rooms on prima and it's only the small ones which are punished. To have more than 30% rb you needed an affiliate. It wasn't some affiliates, trust me
The rule IS respected by other operators on Microgaming. If an affiliate does something without that operator's knowledge that's another matter. But if one site has 1 player on a dodgy deal and another has 50, you can see the difference.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ben78 View Post
I would think the contrary, they would have more recreational players. Grinders go on smaller rooms to have better deals, bad players join bigger sites because they trust them and it's the only site they know in the network
You think that if Ladbrokes & Unibet left Microgaming, Microgaming would have more recreational players? I can only assume you've misread something.

Good players go where recreational players go. Do you think it's fair that three operators (I'd include Nordicbet too to some extent) spend all the money bringing in new players?
Sciolist is offline  
Old 06-30-2012, 09:31 AM   #1170
stranger
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 12
Re: ***The OFFICIAL 2012 Microgaming Regulars Thread***

I was talking about Ladbrokes and Unibet prospective, of course Microgaming would disapear without them and that's why those two sites have the control of the network policy. Ladbrokes and Unibet would have more recreational players without the small sites, it's what I meant.

Good players take into consideration playerpool/deal/software. They are part of the equation as well because it's thanks to them that the site makes huge profit. Ok without bad players there wouldn't be game, so it's normal for the site to attract new players.

So it would mean all big rooms on microgaming were very very naive. Every affiliates proposed the same deals on every microgaming rooms but they wouldn't be aware of it? Deals were so easy to get that I can't believe the rooms weren't aware of it.
To me, it seems that the rule note respected is just a damn excuse to get rid of small rooms, get more control on the network and reduce the amount of good players. What I just regret is how it was done, so quickly without clarity.

Last edited by ben78; 06-30-2012 at 09:40 AM.
ben78 is offline  

Closed Thread
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive