LC Public service announcement: The Shortstacking Spaniards - Page 7 - Medium Stakes Pot Limit and No Limit

ImsaKidd · 03-09-2008, 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tagtastic

This is a different situation. What "professional" online, multi-tabling, ratholing short stackers do is wrong and simply wouldn't be tolerated live (although it is so impractical live that it would never happen in the first place) - but it is tolerated online because the sites want to protect their profit above all else.

This thread falls into a gray area between "how to beat good player X!" and "how to protect yourself from scammers" imo.

If it's gray, let it stay.

Live game debate is retarded.

You cant play 8 live tables at once. You cant play live in your underwear. Etc etc

Melchiades · 03-09-2008, 03:14 PM

You're shortstacking the shortstacking table. Sick.

Triumph36 · 03-09-2008, 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImsaKidd

Live game debate is retarded.

You cant play 8 live tables at once. You cant play live in your underwear. Etc etc

lol yeah sure it is - it is perfectly relevant

why do you even bother coming in here anymore

ImsaKidd · 03-09-2008, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Triumph36

lol yeah sure it is - it is perfectly relevant

why do you even bother coming in here anymore

So youre just going to agree with the parts of the live game debate that benefit you, and ignore the rest?

Triumph36 · 03-09-2008, 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImsaKidd

So youre just going to agree with the parts of the live game debate that benefit you, and ignore the rest?

'you can't play a live game in your underwear' is a legitimate comparison to an actual ethics problem?

go back to BBV where someone still likes you

creative · 03-09-2008, 03:27 PM

imsa, your argument has absolutely 0 bearing on the situation at hand. Playing in your underwear has nothing to do with the ethics of live short stacking, nor does playing 8 tables at once.

MatthewRyan · 03-09-2008, 04:02 PM

IMSA STOP POSTING IN MSNL

skier_5 · 03-09-2008, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImsaKidd

so it's rare enough for you to snap a screenshot huh? I wonder how long that table lasted after that, probably not very long.

Equal · 03-09-2008, 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by selurah

Cry me a river you shortstacking queer.

I have never short-stacked a day in my life. In fact, go through my posts, you can find me supporting a 40bb minimum.

LucidDream · 03-09-2008, 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImsaKidd

big ****in deal. if u had made a video of this table lasting for more than 10 minutes it might actually mean something...ur opinion on this matter still wouldnt tho.

futuredoc85 · 03-09-2008, 06:15 PM

lol MSNL reminds me of a middle school cafeteria

Melchiades · 03-09-2008, 06:15 PM

No love for the fact that Imsa actually tries to exploit the other shortstackers by playing a 10BB stack to their 20BB?

futuredoc85 · 03-09-2008, 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LucidDream

big ****in deal. if u had made a video of this table lasting for more than 10 minutes it might actually mean something...ur opinion on this matter still wouldnt tho.

i mean honestly I'd prefer 40+bb minimums but why exactly does his opinion not mean anything? (Hint: you need a better answer than "because its the opposite of mine")

LucidDream · 03-09-2008, 06:23 PM

cause the only thing he contributes in MSNL is the fact he thinks there shouldn't be any posts on short stacking. he only feels that way because he a) doesn't want all the full stacks to figure out how to play more optimal against him. b) doesn't want some other idiot that is frustrated and not beating 100bb poker to piece together these short stacking posts and figure out how to short stack themselves. until he actually contributes something to MSNL, his opinion doesn't mean anything to me or most of the rest of MSNL.

of course that won't stop him from coming in and giving it anyway but it won't stop me from ****ting on it either.

ImsaKidd · 03-09-2008, 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LucidDream

b) doesn't want some other idiot that is frustrated and not beating 100bb poker to piece together these short stacking posts and figure out how to short stack themselves.

And you want this?