First, let's break down your "reads" a bit, as I think this line of thinking is a HUGE mistake that's in the way of a lot of your improvement as a poker player. I don't mean that to sound negative because just about everyone who has posted in SSNL and MSNL has made the same mistake several times, and still makes the mistake!
Quote:
Villain is a 49/22 fish with 50% fold to sqz when hes the coldcaller and fold to cbet in 3bp 40%.
I mean vs this guy its a shove or a check/fold because he isnt really aggressive but is definitely stabbing here and there.
Over what sample size are these reads? (Rhetorical)
You also mention conflicting reads. 'He isn't aggressive, but he does bet sometimes.' So... I'm just going to go into this one assuming that we know as little about this calling player as the statistics and the language indicate. You're welcome to correct me if you have some hand examples that would prove much more informative than the numbers you've posted.
With lower sample sizes, which is just about always, and for specific positions and multiway action, statistics are very difficult to have carry a lot of weight without comparing them to a massive group of population data. Even then, specific situations and emotions that might affect a player's decisions cause all sorts of noise in your data. 100 hands among 2 unknown players, all hands measured from different positions and with different stack sizes and against different players is about as meaningless as it gets in poker. The data is so noisy that your sample size is almost certainly insignificant. With that out of the way...
The squeeze pre-flop is sized too largely. It's partially why you're having trouble finding a flop bet size that makes sense. You, ideally, want to marry post-flop possibilities with pre-flop folding equity in spots where you want to squeeze. I'd recommend $24 for this spot. Your size is so large, in fact, that you've nearly committed yourself pre-flop against the button with any hand with which you might squeeze, assuming the button could jam ace-king. You're offering yourself such good equity in this situation that the other player can go "well, he isn't bluffing" and just toss everything that doesn't do well enough against a range of hands like TT+/AQs. In other words, who is looking at this squeeze with KTs and feeling confused about what to do?
Onward to the flop given that you've blasted the pot pre-flop, forcing your opponent to have a rather defined range of holdings; whereas, a pre-flop sizing like $24 forces your opponent to call with some hands with which you dominate and fold some hands that actually do have decent equity against your particular holdings (since you'll also have TT+/AQs types of hands here, as well). The smaller size also allows your opponents to 4 bet bluff. The larger size is mostly shove or fold territory, especially for the player who is presumably not as speculative with the majority of his holdings. On the flop, you smash all-in. Why? That bet size doesn't force your opponent to make any/many mistakes. He might fold 44. He's probably always folding AQ... so why jam?
When you make the pre-flop re-raise smaller, you're offering your opponent a more complex game on the flop and one where you have the stronger hand more often on the average board texture. This particular board texture is awful for your range and great for your opponent's hand range. You shouldn't be betting the board texture often at all because of how vulnerable your entire range is.
You'll want to continuation bet some bluffs here, of course, but ones that will do well on future board run outs AND ones with less showdown value. So, consider a hand like J
T
... if you get jammed on, no harm. You toss it. The turn can offer you a lot of profitable semi-bluffs or top pair hands that can now be the better/best hand. If you bet/fold a hand like AK, you might have folded the best hand or a draw with enough equity to continue. That would be a mistake on your part and not be a great way to play poker!