Stop lyin, you were in on the whole thing

yea dis thread is worth a 10point infraction

I would infract you for telling fake homeless stories and starting a whining @ Bobo thread

#BoboFett2017

why would i make up being homeless you ****ing douche bag? Why do you think I'm lying? GFY.

yes

Rich, you're obviously not homeless

so telling someone GFY is not allowed but implying someone's mother is a whore is allowed? i understand that circumventing the profanity filter is wrong but can i tell someone to "eff off"?? or is that not allowed also? its all so arbitrary. can i tell someone to sit on an egg? can i tell someone to sit on it and rotate? can i tell someone i love you? can i tell someone im going to find you in real life and love you? can i tell someone i know the meaning to life? can i tell someone i don't take kindly to your type 'round here? can i punch someone in the face for accusing me of being a liar? can i call someone who uses a HUD online a cheater? can i baselessy accuse someone of lying? where does it end? can i threaten to tickle someone to death?

You also calling them a ****ing douchebag.

yeah i admit i shouldnt have circumvented the profanity filter and deserve an infraction for that.

however, is calling someone a regular douchebag allowed? someone who is erroneously accusing me of lying.

how is it obvious?? im sleeping in my car dude. so EAD for calling me a liar.

Rich, the answer is that it depends on the tenor of the forum and thread you're posting in and the judgement of the mods. In your case, I think many people find your style of posting disagreeable, and as a result, mods are more likely to infract you, and less likely to infract people who insult you. If you don't think this is fair, learn to post differently so people like you more, or stop posting here.

FWIW, EAD used to be censored on 2p2 because it is considered so inappropriate site wide: not only is it a personal attack, but it's homophobic. You should probably be infracted for that post, but since Mr.mmmKay is such a douchebag, I'll allow it.

But no, in most forums except the ones with no standards like the BBVs, calling someone a douchebag would not be allowed.

BBV has standards, that's why they culled this Checkmaker dude.

They almost culled Sammy too

You take that back, right now! No one culls Sammy.

OK it was HandsomeMan

Apology accepted

<<LOl if you think the standra din BBV is bad go have a ook at poiliictics or fitness, these forums are relaly funny. I mena I had like a full bottle of wine now but I still dont feel quite on their level

you got me totally wrong. its everyone else who is the bad guy, trust me.

and EAD didn't seem particularly homophobic to me, but now that I think about, I guess it is. If I add "no ****" after does that make it better? Probably not.

And the bolded part has poor syntax. it should read "FWIW, EAD used to be censored on 2p2 because it is considered inappropriate site wide. Not only is it a personal attack, it's also homophobic."

and FWIW calling someone a "douchebag" is misogynistic.

The words after a colon define or clarify what came before the colon. A dash would be fine instead of the colon, but "Not only is it a personal attack, it's also homophobic" is not a complete sentence.

I love these kinds of threads.

i think it is a complete sentence, however your use of the colon is appropriate and better grammatically.

your use of the word 'but' is incorrect, since my remark being a personal attack and homophobic are not contrasting ideas.

and they love you.

Wrong again http://dictionary.cambridge.org/gram...-only-but-also