Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > Two Plus Two > About the Forums

Notices

About the Forums Here's where you post suggestions about the forums and the software that implements them.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-14-2012, 02:42 AM   #61
Twas diddyeinstein
 
diddy!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: T. Mathieu 8/10 Never Forget
Posts: 9,819
re: Why was Ostensibly Thremp banned? and then we discuss linguistics

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett View Post
Are they? Well, I think what those people can take out of this thread is they can't have him back. What they could've had was a toned down Thremp that didn't choose a screen name that told everyone who he was. Whether they can have that any more, IDK.
Didn't his screen name tell us who he might be.
diddy! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2012, 02:46 AM   #62
2+2 Ad Man
 
Bobo Fett's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canada, eh.
Posts: 35,734
re: Why was Ostensibly Thremp banned? and then we discuss linguistics

Bobo Fett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2012, 08:31 AM   #63
veteran
 
Didace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,699
re: Why was Ostensibly Thremp banned? and then we discuss linguistics

Quote:
Originally Posted by RoundGuy View Post
I think you're insane.
I wouldn't've thought that.
Didace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2012, 12:51 PM   #64
Nixonian
 
kioshk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: fried chicken!
Posts: 58,026
re: Why was Ostensibly Thremp banned? and then we discuss linguistics

I'd've is pure genius. Another arrow in my linguistic quiver.
kioshk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2012, 04:10 PM   #65
Zero wave are madmen
 
MicroBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Broadcasting Minor League Hockey!
Posts: 61,521
re: Why was Ostensibly Thremp banned? and then we discuss linguistics

If anyone wasn't going to follow such instructions I'd've thought he'd've been the type. He'd've been wise to just try it again with a different name. I'd've liked his expertise on issues he'd've been known for back in the day and whether it'd've been under his name or a different one is of little consequence.
MicroBob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2012, 04:27 PM   #66
veteran
 
sheeprustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Staking
Posts: 2,909
re: Why was Ostensibly Thremp banned? and then we discuss linguistics

I learned a new word today.

Spoiler:
sheeprustler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2012, 12:50 AM   #67
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
rakemeplz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: worshipping kevmode
Posts: 7,912
re: Why was Ostensibly Thremp banned? and then we discuss linguistics

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gonso View Post
I'd've is a valid contraction, as are she'd've, it'd, should've, there're, who're, and would've. But you're cautioned against using them outside of dialogue and quotations.

Source: Chicago 16th ed., 5.103

For professional use I wouldn't touch them but forums, hey. YMMV if you're not in the US.
Ship it, holla balla.
rakemeplz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2012, 02:52 PM   #68
veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Belmont Alum
Posts: 2,507
re: Why was Ostensibly Thremp banned? and then we discuss linguistics

So we let people such as steelhouse keep posting but ban thremp? That seems pretty terrible. Thremp obviously said what he thought in a rough way, but he was correct most of the time.
samsonh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2012, 03:05 PM   #69
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
rakemeplz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: worshipping kevmode
Posts: 7,912
re: Why was Ostensibly Thremp banned? and then we discuss linguistics

Ummm, being correct or incorrect a high frequency of the time isn't what gets you banned or unbanned really.

Last edited by rakemeplz; 07-15-2012 at 03:06 PM. Reason: microbob is so pro english user
rakemeplz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2012, 06:30 AM   #70
enthusiast
 
Upstairs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 94
re: Why was Ostensibly Thremp banned? and then we discuss linguistics

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gonso View Post
I'd've is a valid contraction, as are she'd've, it'd, should've, there're, who're, and would've. But you're cautioned against using them outside of dialogue and quotations.

Source: Chicago 16th ed., 5.103

For professional use I wouldn't touch them but forums, hey. YMMV if you're not in the US.
Umm can you use who're in a sentence please? I need clarification before I add it to my lexicon.
Upstairs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2012, 08:30 AM   #71
lolcat
 
kerowo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 20,757
re: Why was Ostensibly Thremp banned? and then we discuss linguistics

Who're you to question the almighty Gonso?
kerowo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2012, 08:32 AM   #72
old hand
 
oNste's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Australia/Micro stakes Stars tab
Posts: 1,745
What did he do to get banned originally?
oNste is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2012, 08:41 AM   #73
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Soulman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Top chef season 11
Posts: 25,503
re: Why was Ostensibly Thremp banned? and then we discuss linguistics

Be a dick basically.
Soulman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2012, 11:46 AM   #74
veteran
 
sba9630's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: This space intentionally left blank
Posts: 3,428
re: Why was Ostensibly Thremp banned? and then we discuss linguistics

Quote:
Originally Posted by Upstairs View Post
Umm can you use who're in a sentence please? I need clarification before I add it to my lexicon.
Who're the people at the next table?
sba9630 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2012, 01:10 PM   #75
enthusiast
 
Upstairs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 94
re: Why was Ostensibly Thremp banned? and then we discuss linguistics

Think I got it. Can I try?

The who're took a deep toke from the crack pipe.
Upstairs is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive