Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat Sklansky
chez is in charge. and he's making a bunch of bizarre decisions
Yeah I'll say. chezlaw just censored my criticism of Breitbart by deleting my post.
A poster asserted Breitbart was a good source of news, and I asserted that they are not, and that they are in fact not a credible source of news. I backed up my claim with by providing two critical analysis publications, critiquing two Breitbart articles, respectively. The first detailed how Breitbart had published false hoods in relation to Global warming, and the second detailed how Breithbart published a false hood by stating Donald Trump won 75% of the popular vote and won in a landslide of the popular vote.
In accordance with journalistic standards, which are necessary for maintaining the health and integrity of political discourse/discussion, I also included links to the original articles on Breitbart. This is a practice that is required by professors in Colleges and Universities when essays, or critical analysis pieces are assigned.
I made a critical analysis of Breitbart, which was that Breitbart is not credible, because they publish false hoods, and I provided citations, according to journalistic standards, and chezlaw deleted both that post, and also censored me by deleting a response I had made to whosnext. In this post, I pointed out that the incredibly vague and arbitrary PC rule is not a good rule, because it violates journalistic integrity. I was punished, through being silenced, for providing citations.
chezlaw is acting completely irrationally, and arbitrarily. chezlaw is censoring users on his own whims, and stifling conversation that adheres to journalistic standards.
chezlaw asserts that posting a link to Breitbart violates the PC rule, which states:
Quote:
2. The forum will have a PC bias. This isn't censorship of ideas. It means posters making an effort to avoid offence to vulnerable groups. Some very extreme topics won't be allowed but in general if there's some political merit to the topic then it's welcome in this forum. What is or isn't PC will change with time - discussion about it will be welcome.
chezlaw, whosnext, and Noodil Wazlib, after posting in support of this rule, all have failed to even try to explain this question:
Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorKeeed
Specifically how do links to breitbart violate the PC rule?
The moderators have been asked probably six times to answer this question, and they refuse to even try.
Last edited by AllCowsEatGrass; 03-13-2017 at 06:28 AM.