Originally Posted by tpir
I allegedly got the big points for being too aggressive towards a mod.
Which as I've pointed out is a serious problem in RGT.
If Charles Manson or Jim Jones posted here during their times, would it be against the rules and an infractable offense to describe one or both of them as cult leaders? That's not an insult; it's a simple description of reality.
This is also what goes on with Jibninjas. People want to show him the truth, and sometimes to do so it needs to be explained how he is avoiding it. Many times he is practicing avoidance. Well what do you know, they actually put in the RGT rules that you can't ask or remind someone to answer something because Jibninjas had been avoiding tough questions and conversations so often that there was an epidemic.
And then guess what happens next? Jib creates a new thread, clamoring for high content. And then everyone explains to him again how he has historically avoided high content, and then those people in turn have their posts deleted or are told that they are "harassing" Jibninjas.
Being "too aggressive" is way, way too vague and the rules in this forum have gone so far off the deep end to protect an intellectually dishonest mod it would be surprising to me if anyone who is truly involved with 2+2 ever comes here or has any idea that this stuff goes on. Apparently pointing out to someone who is clamoring for high content that they have historically avoided high content is "too aggressive" and "harassment" and good enough reason to ban a person.
This forum has essentially outlawed people who actually live in reality.