This is the video I was previously banned for. It wasn't accompanied by any assertions that the CIA had used it against Breitbart, rather with a lame joke "I heard shellfish toxin makes you a bit clammy". No warnings, zero infraction points - to an outright ban across the entire twoplustwo forum - for this.
Not sure how one could categorize a video merely documenting facts revealed in a congressional hearing as 'conspiracy nonsense', in a thread where other posters (who were not banned) had joked / commented on Breitbart being assassinated.
On the subject of instantly banning any poster who mentions conspiracy theories, where do you draw the line on what constitutes such an infraction?
Snowden? Greenwald? Assange? Pilger?
It seems like a rather obscure rule ripe for abuse.
Last edited by Private_Snowball; 07-27-2014 at 06:36 PM.