Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Personal Attacks in Political Forums by Poobahs Mr Wookie, 5ive, goofybalef AoFrantic etc Personal Attacks in Political Forums by Poobahs Mr Wookie, 5ive, goofybalef AoFrantic etc

06-15-2017 , 12:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by batair
Voter suppression, gerrymandering and the Russians?

Last edited by Zorkman; 06-15-2017 at 12:35 AM. Reason: Whatever helps you sleep at night, though...
06-15-2017 , 12:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
You are totally credible now, TOTALLY!
Why don't you believe him?
06-15-2017 , 12:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zorkman
Nah, Biden would agree.

Last edited by batair; 06-15-2017 at 12:44 AM. Reason: At least use one that makes sense.
06-15-2017 , 01:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zorkman
Why don't you believe him?
Well, I mean, let's grant him that he ate a 24 hr ban with which he did not get an infraction, and let's also grant him that he had also made a statism = religion post in the time period around that ban. It is still entirely possible, even likely, that the actual reason for the ban was another post made around the same time, or that his statism =religion post had more content or more context that was relevant to the ban decision that he isn't revealing, and he would not be the first poster being deliberately coy about the actual reason behind his ban.
06-15-2017 , 04:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by leavesofliberty
I think the reason was the election went bad, and some mod wanted to lash out in a tantrum without being known which is why there was a 1-day ban, no explanation, and no comment that received an infraction.
I think you tied your shoelaces wrong that day, which led to a cascading series of events, butterfly effect-style, that ended with you accidentally being banned when a mod was trying to ban someone else.

We have exactly the same amount of evidence for our competing theories.
06-15-2017 , 04:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Well, I mean, let's grant him that he ate a 24 hr ban with which he did not get an infraction, and let's also grant him that he had also made a statism = religion post in the time period around that ban. It is still entirely possible, even likely, that the actual reason for the ban was another post made around the same time, or that his statism =religion post had more content or more context that was relevant to the ban decision that he isn't revealing, and he would not be the first poster being deliberately coy about the actual reason behind his ban.
LOL. Get this guy.

He bans people for trivial bull**** all the time simply because they are on the wrong side politically. If a reason is given it's quite often just a jacked-up convenient one such as the good old troll catch-all.

Little wonder posters are often left pondering wtf they actually got banned for.
06-15-2017 , 01:23 PM
Usually it's because they suck. FYI for your next ban.
06-15-2017 , 02:28 PM
I got banned once, it caused me considerable butthurt.
06-15-2017 , 11:43 PM
All I know is Wookie is smart as a whip, tries to be fair, and is liberal as hell.

Wookie, man, I'd post in your thread but you think mainstream Trump supporters are worse than Hitler. I'm not racist, sexist, or homophobic, and I can stick to the issues not posters. Is there a welcome mat for me in your thread yes or no serious question.
06-15-2017 , 11:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
Usually it's because they suck. FYI for your next ban.
I don't know any of you folks here except some dealings with Wookie, but did you leave your sense of decency at the door when you got your yellow wording? Why do you have to be a dick to that guy, whoever he is? Whoever you are?
06-16-2017 , 02:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zorkman
All I know is Wookie is smart as a whip, tries to be fair, and is liberal as hell.

Wookie, man, I'd post in your thread but you think mainstream Trump supporters are worse than Hitler. I'm not racist, sexist, or homophobic, and I can stick to the issues not posters. Is there a welcome mat for me in your thread yes or no serious question.
You are anti-Muslim as **** at the very least, and I am skeptical about the others. Minimally, every Trump supporter is dumb as ****, ignorant as ****, or pretty OK with the oppression of women and gays and minorities as long as it comes in a package that furthers other goals.
06-16-2017 , 05:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
LOL. Get this guy.

He bans people for trivial bull**** all the time simply because they are on the wrong side politically. If a reason is given it's quite often just a jacked-up convenient one such as the good old troll catch-all.

Little wonder posters are often left pondering wtf they actually got banned for.
Yeah you don't have to get into too many posts in the P forum to get this stuff:

Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
dagger is an idiot who posts fake news he found on WND, idk why people would bother engaging him
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Things are fake when they didn't happen. The only thing that hurts my feelings about your posting is your utter idiocy in trying to pass such things off as fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
lol you think you're the first illiterate right winger to try and trot that out as a win for your team? MLK was a republican before the party adopted the southern strategy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy

Seems to me that P7.0 is being much more diligently modded than the P forum.

idk why i respond in earnest since you're almost certainly just some dumbass racist troll, but here u go
Seems that P7.0 is much more diligent in its modding than P now.
06-16-2017 , 05:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
You are anti-Muslim as **** at the very least, and I am skeptical about the others. Minimally, every Trump supporter is dumb as ****, ignorant as ****, or pretty OK with the oppression of women and gays and minorities as long as it comes in a package that furthers other goals.
62 Million plus Racists, Misogynists, Islamophobic, Homophobic, idiots voted for TRUMP

P forum rules:

Quote:
1. Attack the argument, not the arguer. This includes calling a user a troll, or announcing that you have or are putting someone on ignore. Having your opinion, claim or argument challenged, doubted or dismissed is not attacking the arguer.

2. Don't be a troll.

3. Don't post conspiracy theories or other unsupported hyperbole. Any non-obvious claim about the world should be supported by empirical evidence and an appropriate, reputable citation. The less obvious and/or more radical the claim, the higher the standard will be for supporting evidence and citations. Claims of facts that are refuted by available evidence or that cannot be verified at all have no place in this forum. That includes birther stuff. Birther posts will result in a permaban.

4. No broad-brush attacks on opposing political parties or ideologies

5. No calling for a thread to be locked or for other moderation, and do not criticize moderation decisions in this forum. Use the mod notification button to get a mod's attention, PM a moderator to discuss his modding, or, only AFTER trying the above, PM an admin or go to ATF.

6. Keep posts substantive, particularly new threads. Low-content or off-topic banter belongs in the LC thread or in a designated chatter thread on the subject. Standards here are subjective. If a poor thread was closed that you would like to make a substantive contribution to, PM a moderator with your contribution, and the thread may be reopened.

7. Site-wide rules apply here, as everywhere
-- No spam
-- No begging
-- No linked NSFW* stuff without the link being tagged NSFW
-- No linked porn
-- No wishing death on other posters.
-- No Trainwrecking
-- No filesharing discussion
-- No discussion of methods to break laws, encouragement to break laws, etc.
-- No plagiarism
-- No racism/anti-semitism/etc.
-- etc.
06-16-2017 , 09:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zorkman
All I know is Wookie is smart as a whip, tries to be fair, and is liberal as hell.

Wookie, man, I'd post in your thread but you think mainstream Trump supporters are worse than Hitler. I'm not racist, sexist, or homophobic, and I can stick to the issues not posters. Is there a welcome mat for me in your thread yes or no serious question.
Too bad 2p2 doesn't have like multiple other Wookie-free politics threads in P7, SMP, POG, and SE that you can participate in.
06-16-2017 , 10:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
You are anti-Muslim as **** at the very least, and I am skeptical about the others. Minimally, every Trump supporter is dumb as ****, ignorant as ****, or pretty OK with the oppression of women and gays and minorities as long as it comes in a package that furthers other goals.
while it's perfectly fine to feel this way and state it, doesn't it bring in to question your ability to moderate fairly?
06-16-2017 , 10:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zorkman
I don't know any of you folks here except some dealings with Wookie, but did you leave your sense of decency at the door when you got your yellow wording? Why do you have to be a dick to that guy, whoever he is? Whoever you are?
Because I do know him?
06-16-2017 , 10:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat Sklansky
while it's perfectly fine to feel this way and state it, doesn't it bring in to question your ability to moderate fairly?
Perhaps he meant the Trump supporters he's seen in his forum. It's fairly accurate for the bunch in P7.
06-16-2017 , 10:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat Sklansky
while it's perfectly fine to feel this way and state it, doesn't it bring in to question your ability to moderate fairly?
Is it untrue that Trump explicitly campaigned on Muslim bans, police crackdowns on black neighborhoods, pro life, repealing health care protections for women, deportation forces to rip apart Latino families, etc.? Should a reasonable person have expected Trump to work on some or all of those things, and should they be surprised now that he is?
06-16-2017 , 10:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
Because I do know him?
Speaking of peeps we knew...

Let's say Proph was out drunk driving, and ends up causing a wreck that severs your left middle finger. Assume Proph is right handed.

In ACland, which two of Proph's fingers would you want to see amputated? And... would you be willing consider a compromise where Proph 'volunteers' to an indentured servitude contract instead ??
06-16-2017 , 11:01 AM
No more hook 'em horns for proph I guess.
06-16-2017 , 11:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat Sklansky
while it's perfectly fine to feel this way and state it, doesn't it bring in to question your ability to moderate fairly?
If by "moderate fairly" you mean "completely ignore all but the most obvious dog whistles," then yes, that's probably true.

Do you agree with trump that anyone with Mexican heritage is unable to impartially judge cases where trump is a defendant?
06-16-2017 , 11:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Is it untrue that Trump explicitly campaigned on Muslim bans, police crackdowns on black neighborhoods, pro life, repealing health care protections for women, deportation forces to rip apart Latino families, etc.? Should a reasonable person have expected Trump to work on some or all of those things, and should they be surprised now that he is?

your opinions are fine. just want to be sure that you're not using moderator power in a biased way. your word is fine on the issue.
06-16-2017 , 12:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noodle Wazlib
If by "moderate fairly" you mean "completely ignore all but the most obvious dog whistles," then yes, that's probably true.

Do you agree with trump that anyone with Mexican heritage is unable to impartially judge cases where trump is a defendant?
I'm pretty much done discussing politics on the internet.
06-16-2017 , 12:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
No more hook 'em horns for proph I guess.
Tsk, tsk you 'statists'.

Why wouldn't you want Proph's indenture $$$$ payout for a couple of his years spent sober... perhaps under the whip, wearing only a rag to cover his junk, and kennelled at night alongside the very same privately owned roads he would spend his days picking clean of trash. Why are all you 'statists' so blood thirsty ??

Besides, if I was Proph's lawyer, I'd argue that losing a thumb is too harsh a penalty. Same with an index finger. That's way over double proportional -vs- losing a middle finger. I'd counter with an offer to sacrifice his left middle finger, and left pinkie finger (assuming you are right handed).

Last edited by Shame Trolly !!!1!; 06-16-2017 at 12:29 PM.
06-16-2017 , 05:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat Sklansky
your opinions are fine. just want to be sure that you're not using moderator power in a biased way. your word is fine on the issue.
LOL. A Trump supporter asks wookie if he would be welcome in his forum and in response wookie goes on an unhinged anti- Trump supporter tirade.

Mat then asks wookie if he can moderate a politics forum impartially and he goes on another anti-Trump tirade.

Mat, no offence, but for God's sake grow a pair and get rid of this clown.

Last edited by BroadwaySushy; 06-16-2017 at 06:02 PM.

      
m