Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Moderation of Brick and Mortar The Moderation of Brick and Mortar

03-07-2015 , 04:13 AM
03-07-2015 , 05:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lattimer
Anyway that is probably the last thing I'm addressing ITT. I've been coming in here the past week to address specific issues and explain why we did what we did, to help you guys better understand, but it doesn't seem to make one iota of difference. So I'm done wasting my time.

There's going to be a handful of you that will never like the way it's run until it becomes another OOT. There are a couple of forums on here I wish were run a little different than they currently are, but I accept them the way they are.
The problem isn't that "we just don't understand." The problem is the modding. But obviously, you're not the big offender.

See you all in the next B&M/Rapini/Moderation thread, where once again we'll all learn that that virtually the entire community is wrong but the mods are right.
03-07-2015 , 06:44 AM
Well, I might as well reiterate my longstanding opinion. My biggest complaint with B&M has always been the moderator's personal vendettas that have driven some of my favorite posters from that forum.

Without any thought, four names pop into my mind quickly - posters who were always fun to read. But they're gone now.

I miss the days when the B&M forum was active and fun.
03-07-2015 , 07:08 AM
Why are there so many terrible posters complaining about being called out for being terrible posters?

Like, there are a handful of names that without fail, every time I look to the poster's name after reading a terrible post, sure enough, it's one of the bad posters.


Thank you Rapini and Lattimer for keeping terrible posters out of B&M, even if I DO think the modding is overly heavy-handed.


*edit* I should add that I'm most likely on Rapini's close-watch-list for low content deletion and I've had many conversations via private message with him arguing back and forth about things. I'd prefer a forum where some low content stuff gets through (like posting a humorous and relevant youtube link or whatever). With that said, I know enough about myself to know that I sometimes feel like rules that I mostly agree with just don't apply to me. I always think to myself "If I post X, it'll be funny" but when I see that same stuff posted by other people, I look at it and wish it wasn't there because it's a tired joke and most of the time just isn't funny or adds nothing but more crap I have to scroll past to get to more content. When I think about the overall good of the forum, I'm glad no one else can post that stuff either.

Last edited by ReidLockhart; 03-07-2015 at 07:16 AM.
03-07-2015 , 08:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by niss
Irrespective of whether rapini is great or terrible, you don't help your case when you hide behind an apparently new account without disclosing the name(s) you regularly posted under in B&M. (in response to "randomly banned" or whatever his name is)
Quote:
Originally Posted by plaaynde
Who were you before being banned?
THIS is what I'm talking about.

Change the subject and make it about me. (A tried and true tactic of Rapini's for sure, but one others like to use too. Especially his tiny group of cyber-friends.)

Again (for at least the third or fourth time in the past several years) there are huge threads and massive discussion over a Mod and his behavior. it's the same Mod over and over and yet we sit here and blabber on ONCE AGAIN but nothing changes.

Come on Mat, see the light. This guy is the worst. You've got so many great moderators and many more folks waiting in the wings who'd gladly take on the job, if asked.

It's fascinating that Rapini sees this large number of never ending complaints and yet feels compelled to fight for his "job" but has never (to my knowledge) ever considered relinquishing his Mod post for the good of 2+2. You're a distraction dude.

Hey no worries, in a few months I'm sure they'll be another thread started about this knucklehead and we'll all be back at it again.

03-07-2015 , 09:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by frommagio
Without any thought, four names pop into my mind quickly - posters who were always fun to read. But they're gone now.
Seems odd to write this without naming names, but ymmv.
03-07-2015 , 09:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReidLockhart
Why are there so many terrible posters complaining about being called out for being terrible posters?

Like, there are a handful of names that without fail, every time I look to the poster's name after reading a terrible post, sure enough, it's one of the bad posters.


Thank you Rapini and Lattimer for keeping terrible posters out of B&M, even if I DO think the modding is overly heavy-handed.


*edit* I should add that I'm most likely on Rapini's close-watch-list for low content deletion and I've had many conversations via private message with him arguing back and forth about things. I'd prefer a forum where some low content stuff gets through (like posting a humorous and relevant youtube link or whatever). With that said, I know enough about myself to know that I sometimes feel like rules that I mostly agree with just don't apply to me. I always think to myself "If I post X, it'll be funny" but when I see that same stuff posted by other people, I look at it and wish it wasn't there because it's a tired joke and most of the time just isn't funny or adds nothing but more crap I have to scroll past to get to more content. When I think about the overall good of the forum, I'm glad no one else can post that stuff either.
So lets see only great fantastic posters should be allowed to post in brick and mortar is the message being seen in this thread. Rapini is like the gatekeeper to an exclusive club where only the beautiful people can venture beyond the red velvet ropes. He is just like the bouncers that turn away the unwanted clubbers who are deemed unworthy of getting in, telling them they are stupid, their posting is dickkish and ******ed. Keep out only the good posters can post!

This is really ******ed thinking and people are rightfully sick of it. Tons of people play in brick and mortar casinos now that its much harder to play online poker and not all of them are top level players. What Rapini is doing is akin to telling bad poker players that they are not worthy of sitting at tables because they are donks and will not be allowed to play.

Rapini even put in a request in moderation thread in brick and mortar for the top posters to come in and defend brick and mortar from the bad wretched posters who need to be kept out. There are only a couple of people who complain so it makes him no never mind. There are way more people complaining in this thread then a couple, about not being able to participate and as long as Rapini is mod these threads will be a part of 2 plus 2 until they are not allowed.

Last edited by ZeckoRiver; 03-07-2015 at 09:35 AM.
03-07-2015 , 09:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeckoRiver
So lets see only great fantastic posters should be allowed to post in brick and mortar is the message being seen in this thread. Rapini is like the gatekeeper to an exclusive club where only the beautiful people can venture beyond the red velvet ropes. He is just like the bouncers that turn away the unwanted clubbers who are deemed unworthy of getting in, telling them they are stupid, their posting is dickkish and ******ed. Keep out only the good posters can post!

This is really ******ed thinking and people are rightfully sick of it. Tons of people play poker and not all of them are top level players. What Rapini is doing is akin to telling bad poker players that they are not worthy of sitting at tables because they are donks and will not be allowed to play.

Rapini even put in a request in moderation thread in brick and mortar for the top posters to come in and defend brick and mortar from the bad wretched posters who need to be kept out. There are only a couple of people who complain so it makes him no never mind. There are way more people complaining in this thread about not being able to participate and as long as Rapini is mod these threads will be a part of 2 plus 2 until they are not allowed.
Again, what we're seeing is typical. The discussion falls apart and the point is lost. Rapini and his small group of supporters will fire off their curt responses, change the subject, pivot the discussion away from Rapini's behavior and then just wait it out until the furor dies down.

This will blow over, he'll continue to abuse his Mod role and act like an ass and months from now there will be another thread started complaining about him. Again.

It's ponderous, man. Just ponderous.
03-07-2015 , 09:53 AM
Sorry for two quick posts in a row.

Here’s Rapini soliciting support and basically imploring them to come over and defend him:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapini
For anyone who is interested in this sort of thing, there's a thread in ATF about moderation in the B&M Forum.

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/55...ortar-1514371/

I'd be especially interested in hearing from anyone, either publicly or privately, who has made positive contributions to B&M in the past and has decided to post less or not at all because of moderation in the B&M Forum. If we're losing good posters because of anything you guys think we're doing wrong or could be doing better, we want to change so that we do right by you, the people who make the forum great by providing information for the community.
Notice that he refers to the situation as "we" and doesn't take ownership of his bad behavior.

And one of his supporters chimes in with:

Quote:
Originally Posted by AngusThermopyle
So, we are officially invited?
Thread's been going a week and from what I can see, there are relatively few B&M regulars in it.
But quite a few from other forums. Considering their quality of posts in those forums, I do not miss their presence here.
What’s interesting is the response from another Mod named Garick who hits the nail on the head and makes the most important, spot-on observation of anyone. (See his remarks below.) The odds that anyone in charge - or Rapini for that matter -will take his comments to heart are quite low IMHO.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garick
I'll stay out of the ATF poo-flinging, but I do still feel that some of those folks have a point. They turn it in to hyperbole, and most of them haven't been around here post M&B re-merge, so it's way overstated, but there is a "chilling effect" from the modding style here. I feel like almost all of the actions that y'all take are defendable and even positive in a vacuum, but that there's a default of "take no crap," rather than "keep an eye on it and de-escalate if needed, further steps than that if people are stubbornly combative."

Some of my best posters in LLSNL get a bit bitchy sometimes. I send them a PM reminding them about the standards, and get a "yeah, sorry. I let my frustration get the better of me" response and a moderation of behavior for at least a couple of weeks without having to infract. Then I have to do it again, sometimes. Still, these are guys who would likely be over 100 points and perma-banned if I'd given them 10 points each time, and yet they are vastly net positive to the forum.

Frankly, some previously banned posters are just fine, now. I think that most people should be given a chance to change and should actually have to do something wrong ITF to be re-banned, rather than being BOS just for having been banned before. By all means, ban the ones who come back to troll, but if they're acting like grown-ups now, why worry about whether they were previously banned?

Last edited by Randomly Banned.; 03-07-2015 at 09:59 AM. Reason: Toned it down a bit.
03-07-2015 , 10:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeckoRiver
So lets see only great fantastic posters should be allowed to post in brick and mortar is the message being seen in this thread. Rapini is like the gatekeeper to an exclusive club where only the beautiful people can venture beyond the red velvet ropes. He is just like the bouncers that turn away the unwanted clubbers who are deemed unworthy of getting in, telling them they are stupid, their posting is dickkish and ******ed. Keep out only the good posters can post!

This is really ******ed thinking and people are rightfully sick of it. Tons of people play in brick and mortar casinos now that its much harder to play online poker and not all of them are top level players. What Rapini is doing is akin to telling bad poker players that they are not worthy of sitting at tables because they are donks and will not be allowed to play.

Rapini even put in a request in moderation thread in brick and mortar for the top posters to come in and defend brick and mortar from the bad wretched posters who need to be kept out. There are only a couple of people who complain so it makes him no never mind. There are way more people complaining in this thread then a couple, about not being able to participate and as long as Rapini is mod these threads will be a part of 2 plus 2 until they are not allowed.
The first couple of paragraphs isn't a terrible analogy, but you need to change "bad poker players" to "players with poor etiquette." And the bar, or "velvet rope" if you like, isn't high--respect others and respect privacy:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/27...-03-a-1431611/

The last paragraph is a lie, per your usual. Here's every post I've made in the B&M Moderation Discussion Thread recently. Note that one of them actually says the exact opposite of the lie you told (emphasis added):

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapini
For anyone who is interested in this sort of thing, there's a thread in ATF about moderation in the B&M Forum.

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/55...ortar-1514371/

I'd be especially interested in hearing from anyone, either publicly or privately, who has made positive contributions to B&M in the past and has decided to post less or not at all because of moderation in the B&M Forum. If we're losing good posters because of anything you guys think we're doing wrong or could be doing better, we want to change so that we do right by you, the people who make the forum great by providing information for the community.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapini
Thanks for the response AT. Honestly, I don't feel that anyone should feel the need to "defend" B&M or B&M moderation in ATF. If it's working for the B&M regulars, then it's working.

My concern presently is that there could be posters out there who would positive contributors but are turned off by one thing or another with respect to moderation here. And if there's something we can change to get those good posters involved while maintaining good signal-to-noise ratio and continuing to please the current contributors, that would be a step forward.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapini
Haha I love "new/old."

Yeah there's a couple people who seem to post in every ATF thread just to troll or make stupid off-topic comments and every thread ends up with them taking over unless it's locked.

Also, as you mentioned, there's a good number of posters in there who either are exiled from B&M or were previously-banned.

Neither of those groups of posters concern me.
You must have some sort of psychological disease if you're lying about things that are so easily proven false. Please seek help.
03-07-2015 , 10:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomly Banned.
THIS is what I'm talking about.

Change the subject and make it about me.

Its not about you. But here is the thing, when you shout .... Rapini is bad he is banning valuable posters and scaring away valuable posters with his evil moderation ........ and you don;lt give us any specifics about what it is he is "modding wrong" we need to try to pull those out of you.

So you were "randomly" banned. For no reason whatsoever other than "Rapini" well tell us who you are and what posts were the point of contention so that we might see for ourselves how terribly wronged you were. Why is that so hard?

Before Rapini I had an issue with TT who was moderating B&M. Its been awhile but I could probably find the thread was an issue and I can definitely tell you what the content of my post was that got him to threaten to have me banned.

If I was making here to make the argument that TT was a bad moderator or that the standards he used for moderating were bad ..... I would spell it all out for you.

So why don't you guys spell out specifically what Rapini is doing that is a problem. If he deleted your post tell us what was in the post (and point us to the thread so we can see for ourselves.

Maybe you have legitimate grievances .... but since my experience is that he hasn't bothered me if you want to convince he is out of line .... show me what he has done. And if you tell us what name you were banned under then at least we can take a look for ourselves.
03-07-2015 , 10:29 AM
Lol at Rapini preaching etiquette .
03-07-2015 , 11:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomly Banned.
Again, what we're seeing is typical. The discussion falls apart and the point is lost. Rapini is unfairly assailed by small group of terrible posters who will fire off their curt responses, change the subject, pivot the discussion away from their behavior and then wonder why the rules don't apply to them.

This will blow over, they'll continue to abuse Rapini and act like an ass and months from now there will be another thread started complaining about him. Again.

It's ponderous, man. Just ponderous.
fyp
03-07-2015 , 11:09 AM
Zecko, Randomly, you're not helping your case. None of your posts scream 'rational' or 'level-headed', they just scream.
03-07-2015 , 11:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapini
To be fair, Zecko River isn't allowed to post in BBV, so that isn't an option for him.

Respecting peoples privacy like you respected mine by divulging my user notes? My user notes are incorrect by the way and hopefully the above will be resolved as it is not true. Fair enough roo time to let this thread run its course. See you on the next one as read only. Not like it is going to get anywhere.

Last edited by ZeckoRiver; 03-07-2015 at 11:20 AM.
03-07-2015 , 11:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alrighty Roo
Zecko, Randomly, you're not helping your case. None of your posts scream 'rational' or 'level-headed', they just scream.
Seriously?

Nothing about my posts are irrational or screaming. As I've said before, attacking the messenger instead of addressing the issue at hand is typical, already predicted and off-putting.

Nice try though.
03-07-2015 , 11:30 AM
Always nice to have people i've never actually talked to, especially in BM, talk **** about me!
03-07-2015 , 11:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomly Banned.
Seriously?

Nothing about my posts are irrational or screaming. As I've said before, attacking the messenger instead of addressing the issue at hand is typical, already predicted and off-putting.

Nice try though.
If you'd read the thread you'd know I agree that the modding is overzealous. Your straw man argument demonstrates my point.
03-07-2015 , 11:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapini
You must have some sort of psychological disease if you're lying about things that are so easily proven false. Please seek help.
Rapini, do you understand how bad this post was? I recommend you partly step down, get a couple of other mods to B&M, in addition to you and Lattimer. You could maybe do 1/4 of the modding for example. Mat?


Edit: Here are the mods of for example NVG:

Mike Haven, Kevmath, AdamSchwartz, Professionalpoker, Jamie Platinum, TheEngineer, SGT RJ, Admo, mlagoo, R*R, Dynasty

Nine "regular" moderators. B&M has only two. Wouldn't for example four greens be a somewhat correct number for B&M?

Last edited by plaaynde; 03-07-2015 at 11:59 AM.
03-07-2015 , 11:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeckoRiver
Lol at Rapini preaching etiquette .
ZR: <lie>
R: <you lied again>
ZR: <lol R>

Seek help.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeckoRiver
Respecting peoples privacy like you respected mine by divulging my user notes? My user notes are incorrect by the way and hopefully the above will be resolved as it is not true. Fair enough roo time to let this thread run its course. See you on the next one as read only. Not like it is going to get anywhere.
User notes are not private. Every moderator can see them and no one ever has even suggested to me that they're classified information or should not be shared. If there were private information of some sort in there, e.g., someone's real name, address, etc., I would treat that differently. The fact that you're exiled from BBV doesn't qualify.
03-07-2015 , 11:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by psandman
Its not about you. But here is the thing, when you shout .... Rapini is bad he is banning valuable posters and scaring away valuable posters with his evil moderation ........ and you don;lt give us any specifics about what it is he is "modding wrong" we need to try to pull those out of you.

So you were "randomly" banned. For no reason whatsoever other than "Rapini" well tell us who you are and what posts were the point of contention so that we might see for ourselves how terribly wronged you were. Why is that so hard?

Before Rapini I had an issue with TT who was moderating B&M. Its been awhile but I could probably find the thread was an issue and I can definitely tell you what the content of my post was that got him to threaten to have me banned.

If I was making here to make the argument that TT was a bad moderator or that the standards he used for moderating were bad ..... I would spell it all out for you.

So why don't you guys spell out specifically what Rapini is doing that is a problem. If he deleted your post tell us what was in the post (and point us to the thread so we can see for ourselves.

Maybe you have legitimate grievances .... but since my experience is that he hasn't bothered me if you want to convince he is out of line .... show me what he has done. And if you tell us what name you were banned under then at least we can take a look for ourselves.
I've not shouted. Mr. psandman, I don't know why you attempt to diminish my posts by implying that I'm "shouting" or "screaming?" What next, am I going to be attacked by Rapini and others and cast as an unworthy newbie or someone with something to hide who has an agenda? (Did I predict this earlier, or what?)



Also, I was never "randomly banned." I chose that scream named based upon a thread title I was lurking in quite some time ago. In fact, here it is:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/55...anned-1354548/

The thing you gentlemen seem to miss is that my point has simply been:

This is not the first time he's been the focus of widespread unhappiness. His overzealous modding and arrogant boorish attitude have been widely acknowledged for several years now. Numerous members of 2+2 have provided the specifics.

And yet, NOTHING HAS CHANGED.

As I've said before, and I'll say again, how many times does this discussion have to occur in multiple threads over many, many years until someone finally realizes that this fellow has a problem?

It's always The Rapini Show. And it's boring.

My point has been, and continues to be, that he is a habitual offender and every time it is discussed nothing ever gets done to fix the issue. (Unless you count the creation of Mortar and Brick as one, and we know what a waste of time that was.) And like clockwork his small weirdly loyal group of cyber-buds rush to his aid; those complaining get attacked (e.g., you're not a quality poster; you're a troll; you were banned by him in the past and therefore have an agenda, etc.) and on top of that, halfway through the thread the topic is highjacked and the original points lost.

Again, Garick's comments were excellent. Why doesn't anyone want to talk about the points he/she made? And why will no one comment on how often Rapini has been the focus of attention and analyze why this keeps happening?

I'm sorry folks but the Rapini Show is really, really boring.

Come on Mat, find a replacement for this guy.
03-07-2015 , 12:03 PM
Quote:
The fact that you're exiled from BBV doesn't qualify.
You haven't apologized for this yet. When you discovered you had spread wrong information in that way, you should. Lattimer clearly felt sorry for the system, and took appropriate action. You would have time to take care of things like these if you had a lesser share of the modding.
03-07-2015 , 12:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alrighty Roo
If you'd read the thread you'd know I agree that the modding is overzealous. Your straw man argument demonstrates my point.
Roo, I have no quarrel with you and I apologize if I've offended in any way.

My point has simply been that this is not the first time he's been the focus of widespread unhappiness. His overzealous modding and arrogant boorish attitude have been recognized for years. Numerous members have provided the specifics.

How many times does this discussion have to occur in multiple threads over many, many years until someone finally realizes he's the problem?

Look at his responses to ZeckoRiver posted in the last hour. He comes off as an angry, unhappy person and he's rude and abusive. Are those the traits you want in a 2+2 Mod? IMO, he needs to either resign or Mat needs to put him in timeout until he learns a gentler, kinder approach to Modding.

(If I had this many people complaining about me I'd do what's best for 2+2 and give up the ghost. But that's me. I don't expect Rapini will ever change unless he's dragged away kicking and screaming.)

03-07-2015 , 12:13 PM
Quote:

Originally Posted by Randomly Banned.

Again, what we're seeing is typical. The discussion falls apart and the point is lost. Rapini is unfairly assailed by small group of terrible posters who will fire off their curt responses, change the subject, pivot the discussion away from their behavior and then wonder why the rules don't apply to them.

This will blow over, they'll continue to abuse Rapini and act like an ass and months from now there will be another thread started complaining about him. Again.

It's ponderous, man. Just ponderous.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Didace
fyp
Thank you for making my predictions come true. Not sure why you'd mock me and try to diminish my previous posts. You are quite creative and this response was very entertaining.

If you'd care to respond to my original points I'd be happy to engage.
03-07-2015 , 12:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by plaaynde
You haven't apologized for this yet. When you discovered you had spread wrong information in that way, you should. Lattimer clearly felt sorry for the system, and took appropriate action. You would have time to take care of things like these if you had a lesser share of the modding.
Normally I wouldn't engage a troll such as yourself, but essentially you've accused me of lying so I need to clear that up. There's nothing to apologize for because I am correct according to both his user notes and the mod who exiled him.

      
m