Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included
View Poll Results: Should 2+2 ban signatures?
No
35 19.55%
Yes, except 1-2 word poster's real name sigs.
27 15.08%
Yes, all sigs
98 54.75%
Bastard!
19 10.61%

04-13-2012 , 09:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
Don't worry, he's on his way outside now.
I'll go warn the sheep i hear he's a BAAAAAAAAAAAA'D boy

Is misé Tompakee®
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-13-2012 , 03:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
If it annoyed 90% or even 66% of people then i would have no problem stopping using it but as the only people who it seems to bother are a few who seem to think that this site is their personal domain i will keep using it. If you don't like my signature then please feel free to place me on your ignore list. I will sleep soundly tonight either way.

Is Misé Tompakee®
Maybe the only people who seem to be bothered by it are those who have posted to that effect, but perhaps it should occur to you that many people dislike it but think it not worth commenting, particularly because you've been pretty clear about what they think.

I'd be willing to bet quite a lot that if the membership at large were polled, > 66% would say they consider it annoying.

(fwiw, while I dislike all signatures, for me it's the emoticon that is most egregious — to me, that particular emoticon says "I'm eight years old, and you just read my post anyway — hah hah!")
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-13-2012 , 03:29 PM
change it to book emoticon

i'm 47 years old and you just read my post anyways, HA HA!
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-13-2012 , 04:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregorio
but it isn't nearly as annoying as your avatar. is your main pupose posting on 2p2 to annoy people?

Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-13-2012 , 10:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
But that is a somewhat annoying signature with the bogus ® and the silly smiley. Not that I care all that much, I'm just sayin'.
Quote:
Originally Posted by atakdog
(fwiw, while I dislike all signatures, for me it's the emoticon that is most egregious — to me, that particular emoticon says "I'm eight years old, and you just read my post anyway — hah hah!")
How about removing that emoticon, tompakee?
I don't want to see these instead though:
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-14-2012 , 12:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by atakdog
(fwiw, while I dislike all signatures, for me it's the emoticon that is most egregious — to me, that particular emoticon says "I'm eight years old, and you just read my post anyway — hah hah!")
lol +1. And since I have no idea what "Is mise" means, the emoticon evokes some corny uncle laughing at his own joke that no one gets.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-14-2012 , 05:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToTheInternet
lol +1. And since I have no idea what "Is mise" means, the emoticon evokes some corny uncle laughing at his own joke that no one gets.
I mise means "I am with respect"


Is mise Tompakee
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-14-2012 , 08:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
Is mise Tompakee®
FYP
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-14-2012 , 08:44 AM
Seriously thoo... How is there no poll
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-14-2012 , 09:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackfriday415
Seriously thoo... How is there no poll
Let's vote if we are to have a poll about if we are to have a poll about it.

Seriously.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-14-2012 , 12:10 PM
Yes, make a poll
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-14-2012 , 12:19 PM
I wonder if NMHU knows that every time he posts his screen name is attached to said post, eliminating the need for a signature?

-CB
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-14-2012 , 12:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBorders
I wonder if NMHU knows that every time he posts his screen name is attached to said post, eliminating the need for a signature?

-CB
Pretty much my thoughts.

Your username and an avatar of your choice are already displayed.

We don't need anything more to identify people. Whether it be a line of text, your name, or an image someone bedazzled in photoshop.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-14-2012 , 01:06 PM
I can see signing your real name as it isn't otherwise on the post and personalizes the message, but signing your username is just pointless and annoying.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-14-2012 , 01:08 PM
Well, as Lee already pointed out, a lot of people were used to signing things, since back in the olden days, you signed all your letters.

Honestly, though, I don't understand why seeing something simple like

-NMHU

bothers people.

Getting riled up over something so tiny (and also so pervasive on the internet) seems like a sure way of going through the day in a bad mood.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-14-2012 , 01:17 PM
I don't find -NMHU annoying at all but Is mise Tompakee() is ridiculous.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-14-2012 , 01:35 PM
Putting Is mise Tompakee r on every post is so eccentric that I kinda like it.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-14-2012 , 01:41 PM
signatures are tilting and i have ranted about them in the past

currently there is a wanker named bernie posting a lot in the politics forum who signs 100% of his posts "-b"

one sentence, one word, everything "-b" at the bottom.

what is wrong with you people? should be a snap ban for anyone doing it on posts that are not lengthy diatribes or 'official' type statements or letters.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-14-2012 , 01:55 PM
You need to monitize this mutha out and find out how much a user will pay for the ability to edit out Topmakee's sig on every post.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-14-2012 , 04:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.mmmKay
I think name signatures are only acceptable on somewhat long posts, to make them look like a letter of sorts.
Things like:

Ban op

-NMHU

Or:

+1

-NMHU

Are pretty annoying and pointless imo
This sums up my feelings exactly. A long, content rich post with an attached signature, although not necessary, is tolerable. 1 liners with a sig should be considered ban worthy
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-14-2012 , 05:56 PM
Posts where people complain about stuff and say it's ban worthy should be ban worthy.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-14-2012 , 06:04 PM
I think these are all fantastic ideas. Great meeting imo!


warmest regards,
Is mise clare quilty
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-14-2012 , 06:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SGT RJ
Posts where people complain about stuff and say it's ban worthy should be ban worthy.
Saying Ban OP should get you a temp ban.

-Ban OP
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-14-2012 , 06:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ganstaman
I can see signing your real name as it isn't otherwise on the post and personalizes the message, but signing your username is just pointless and annoying.
Right, it seems so pointless to me to sign a post with a made-up screen name. Even more pointless is to sign a post with an abbreviation of said made-up screen name. If you know what it stands for, you already knew who made the post. And if you don't know what it stands for, now you have to look for the screen name to figure it out.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-15-2012 , 01:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by snagglepuss
signatures are tilting and i have ranted about them in the past

currently there is a wanker named bernie posting a lot in the politics forum who signs 100% of his posts "-b"

one sentence, one word, everything "-b" at the bottom.

what is wrong with you people? should be a snap ban for anyone doing it on posts that are not lengthy diatribes or 'official' type statements or letters.
+1

-E
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote

      
m