Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > Two Plus Two > About the Forums

Notices

About the Forums Here's where you post suggestions about the forums and the software that implements them.

View Poll Results: Should 2+2 ban signatures?
No 35 19.89%
Yes, except 1-2 word poster's real name sigs. 27 15.34%
Yes, all sigs 96 54.55%
Bastard! 18 10.23%
Voters: 176. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-06-2012, 01:56 PM   #61
Accepting mocking
 
plaaynde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Local Group
Posts: 6,929
Re: Let's ban signatures!

Quote:
Originally Posted by wafflehouse1 View Post
Im ready for you to unveil your new undertitle
You have more power than I imagined.
plaaynde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 02:27 PM   #62
old hand
 
monkeylump's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Hiding from Rapini
Posts: 1,997
Re: Let's ban signatures!

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2/325Falcon View Post
Going to start signing all my posts with U mad.

-U mad.
I dare you to do it in BBV. You can't. You mad?






-monkeylump


"Listen to that sound? Hear that sound? Getting in an out of trees? That flop-flop sound? Mm, that sound will sure mistake you for turkeys. Listen. Hear that flop-flop. Limbs breaking. Hear that good flop, then? Listening to that gives me the turkey fever. Mm, I wish there were as many turkeys as there are buzzards." -Vernon, Florida
monkeylump is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 03:25 PM   #63
Nixonian
 
kioshk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Young Nixon predicts Spurs sweep
Posts: 57,965
Re: Let's ban signatures!

Quote:
Originally Posted by SGT RJ View Post
Signatures must survive!

- I buttsecks
I think you're cool, SGT RJ.
kioshk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 03:30 PM   #64
2+2 Ad Man
 
Bobo Fett's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canada, eh.
Posts: 35,671
Re: Let's ban signatures!

I might come around to the idea of sigs now that I've finally found a quote worthy of one.

BF

"I will not be attending this party. I personally don't find poker and partying to mix well. I see nothing that relates poker to partying. If I wanted to play poker I would just play online or at a local cardroom vs bad players. The food probably won't be any good and just doesn't seem like it is worth my time honestly." - kevmode
Bobo Fett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 03:36 PM   #65
Worships space elves
 
SGT RJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: power mad fool
Posts: 32,445
Re: Let's ban signatures!

Proving once again why he's the undisputed master of the funnies.

- BF's biggest fan who s buttseck
SGT RJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 03:44 PM   #66
Accepting mocking
 
plaaynde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Local Group
Posts: 6,929
Re: Let's ban signatures!

Quote:
Originally Posted by SGT RJ View Post
Proving once again why he's the undisputed master of the funnies.

- BF's biggest fan who s buttseck
You mean he is funnier than me?


- C'mon
plaaynde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 05:34 PM   #67
 
wafflehouse1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: A House. Made of Waffles.
Posts: 7,196
Re: Let's ban signatures!

Quote:
Originally Posted by plaaynde View Post
You have more power than I imagined.
That's right

Last edited by wafflehouse1; 04-06-2012 at 05:35 PM. Reason: -Bobo
wafflehouse1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 05:59 PM   #68
adept
 
WalterS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: 2012 OOT Sub-Valedictorian
Posts: 922
Re: Let's ban signatures!

Quote:
Originally Posted by plaaynde View Post
Help me, WHAT IS THE TRUTH?
That a vast majority of non dimwits do not like signatures or use them. Also that people who use signatures are insulting and wasting the time of those that do not. Nobody wants to read or see the same content-less lines of text over and over again.

And yes, I have ignored several people with signatures.

- WalterS

"You mark that frame an 8, and you're entering a world of pain. A world of pain. [shouting] Has the whole world gone crazy? Am I the only one around here who gives a **** about the rules? Mark it zero! Mark it zero! You think I'm ****ing around here? Mark it zero!

It's a league game, Smokey"
WalterS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 06:36 PM   #69
veteran
 
sheeprustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Staking
Posts: 2,908
Re: Let's ban signatures!

Quote:
Originally Posted by atakdog View Post
What does "Is mise Tompakee" even mean?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett View Post
I'm pretty sure it means I am Tompakee.
Tá tú ceart.

Spoiler:
sheeprustler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 06:58 PM   #70
Worships space elves
 
SGT RJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: power mad fool
Posts: 32,445
Re: Let's ban signatures!

Quote:
Originally Posted by WalterS View Post
That a vast majority of non dimwits do not like signatures or use them. Also that people who use signatures are insulting and wasting the time of those that do not.
How in the world do a few random lines at the end of a post, most of which simply identify the poster, constitute an insult in any way, shape, or form?

- WalterS = dimwit

would be an insult.

- NMHU

is not.
SGT RJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 08:05 PM   #71
10K Avoidance Incarnate
 
Bizarro Gonso's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 454
Re: Let's ban signatures!

Seeing as though big obnoxious auto-signatures already aren't part of this site, "banning" signatures really means having the mods make it an infraction-type offense. Most have better uses for their time.

If you can't get your OCD under control than put the users who do it on ignore
Bizarro Gonso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 08:14 PM   #72
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Alrighty Roo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Hopping
Posts: 13,354
Re: Let's ban signatures!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett View Post
I might come around to the idea of sigs now that I've finally found a quote worthy of one.

BF

"I will not be attending this party. I personally don't find poker and partying to mix well. I see nothing that relates poker to partying. If I wanted to play poker I would just play online or at a local cardroom vs bad players. The food probably won't be any good and just doesn't seem like it is worth my time honestly." - kevmode
kevmode is the exception that proves the rule.

The hilarious thing is that everything he says doesn't appear to have the slightest hint of insincerity.
Alrighty Roo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 08:40 PM   #73
journeyman
 
onesteptheface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 326
Re: Let's ban signatures!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bizarro Gonso View Post
Seeing as though big obnoxious auto-signatures already aren't part of this site, "banning" signatures really means having the mods make it an infraction-type offense. Most have better uses for their time.
Like what?



-Morphy
onesteptheface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 08:59 PM   #74
2+2 Ad Man
 
Bobo Fett's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canada, eh.
Posts: 35,671
Re: Let's ban signatures!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alrighty Roo View Post
kevmode is the exception that proves the rule.

The frightening thing is that everything he says doesn't appear to have the slightest hint of insincerity.
FYP.
Bobo Fett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2012, 12:35 AM   #75
adept
 
WalterS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: 2012 OOT Sub-Valedictorian
Posts: 922
Re: Let's ban signatures!

Quote:
Originally Posted by SGT RJ View Post
How in the world do a few random lines at the end of a post, most of which simply identify the poster, constitute an insult in any way, shape, or form?

- WalterS = dimwit

would be an insult.

- NMHU

is not.
I guess insulting may not be the best word but I'm not sure what the word is. Disrespectful maybe or just plain inconsiderate. They are making people read the same meaningless lines of text over and over and over again (or at least attempting to until they get ignored). Inconsiderate is probably what I should have said.

I really don't know why people are arguing with me here. Maybe I haven't presented my ideas in the best manner possible, but it doesn't seem like there is much of a debate that most signatures suck.

And just to be clear I'm talking about signatures like tompakee's. Not Mason's or Nate's or even NMHU's.


I understand the complaint that it would just be more work for mods, but I don't think it's much more at all. There are very few people that use signatures like tompakee's and it wouldn't take long at all to eliminate them.

A simple rule change and a post in the mod forum, and then a few PMs/warnings to the offenders and POOF, problem solved.
WalterS is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive