Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > Two Plus Two > About the Forums

Notices

About the Forums Here's where you post suggestions about the forums and the software that implements them.

View Poll Results: Does Gary Johnson tilt you?
YES 141 63.23%
NO, I DONATE/SUPPORT HIS CAUSE 82 36.77%
Voters: 223. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-25-2011, 07:33 PM   #106
banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 17,356
Re: Gary Johnson removal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RoundTripper View Post
MM?
Tartufo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 07:39 PM   #107
grinder
 
RoundTripper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: location, location
Posts: 654
Re: Gary Johnson removal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tartufo View Post
MM?
RoundTripper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 07:51 PM   #108
banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 17,356
Re: Gary Johnson removal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RoundTripper View Post
MM?
Tartufo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 08:05 PM   #109
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
aggo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: nyc
Posts: 8,137
Re: Gary Johnson removal?

Although Mason has a cute story of how 2+2 got connected to Gary Johnson, I can't help but think that this was simply a ploy to further monetize 2+2 in the future. I thought it was very distasteful to shove a political candidate onto a online message board where (a) users who create content are paid nothing (b) 2+2 owners probably profit 500k+/year (c) this board traditionally was never polticized. Gary Johnson presented a unique opportunity for 2+2 to become a political arm, and a platform to push political messages to people who are traditionally disaffected by politics. There's no doubt that this was also a test case for the future. Look at how heavily monetized 2+2 is already. If you're a small poker site and you want a sponsored forum on 2+2, prepare to pay tens of thousands for a couple months.

Last edited by aggo; 11-25-2011 at 08:10 PM.
aggo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 05:02 PM   #110
Heads Up SNG Forum
 
ChicagoRy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: ColoradoRy
Posts: 15,151
Re: Gary Johnson removal?

aggo, your post has a lot of paranoia in it and you're overthinking a lot of it too.

Your conclusions are a few steps removed from the reality of the situation.

One example, you bitch about the price of advertising here, then you name literally the most expensive option on one of the highest traffic internet forums on the internet. Find some other forums near the top of the most popular lists (bigboards or some other metric) and see what it costs to advertise there. Ask them how much it costs to sponsor a forum and see what kinds of numbers you get.

This isn't a little baby site community, this place is massive, one of the largest internet message boards in the world (and there's free options to advertise here too, along with very cheap methods... there are poker coaches that make 5 figures a month coaching players that they come into contact with from having a $150 a month coaching ad on the site). 2p2 has actually made advertising options more accessible as they have grown, not the opposite.

Here's a gripe from me: You post a handful of outright false statements, I can literally prove a few of the "views" you made false. MM takes an action he probably believes in and likely is telling the truth about his intentions. Yet, MM gets a bunch of hate from users like you. My gripe: Who is giving the guys that post outright false stuff and obviously have no clue what they are talking about crap (the advertising thing makes this apparent that you have no idea what you're talking about WRT to advertising prices and setup)? The owners and management and a lot of the best posters on this site aren't so hands on, obsessed with answering every little inquiry or correcting every little false post. You and other users like you only thrive in this environment because the people that are responsible for it are pretty darn reasonable and hands off in most ways. If this place were like you imply it is, you wouldn't be posting in this forum because ATF wouldn't exist, nor would your account be free to post, because you'd be unlikely to have made 5k posts without being permanently banned.
ChicagoRy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 07:47 PM   #111
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
aggo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: nyc
Posts: 8,137
Re: Gary Johnson removal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChicagoRy View Post
aggo, your post has a lot of paranoia in it and you're overthinking a lot of it too.

Your conclusions are a few steps removed from the reality of the situation.

One example, you bitch about the price of advertising here, then you name literally the most expensive option on one of the highest traffic internet forums on the internet. Find some other forums near the top of the most popular lists (bigboards or some other metric) and see what it costs to advertise there. Ask them how much it costs to sponsor a forum and see what kinds of numbers you get.

This isn't a little baby site community, this place is massive, one of the largest internet message boards in the world (and there's free options to advertise here too, along with very cheap methods... there are poker coaches that make 5 figures a month coaching players that they come into contact with from having a $150 a month coaching ad on the site). 2p2 has actually made advertising options more accessible as they have grown, not the opposite.

Here's a gripe from me: You post a handful of outright false statements, I can literally prove a few of the "views" you made false. MM takes an action he probably believes in and likely is telling the truth about his intentions. Yet, MM gets a bunch of hate from users like you. My gripe: Who is giving the guys that post outright false stuff and obviously have no clue what they are talking about crap (the advertising thing makes this apparent that you have no idea what you're talking about WRT to advertising prices and setup)? The owners and management and a lot of the best posters on this site aren't so hands on, obsessed with answering every little inquiry or correcting every little false post. You and other users like you only thrive in this environment because the people that are responsible for it are pretty darn reasonable and hands off in most ways. If this place were like you imply it is, you wouldn't be posting in this forum because ATF wouldn't exist, nor would your account be free to post, because you'd be unlikely to have made 5k posts without being permanently banned.
You're right that merge skins paying 2+2 somewhere around 80-120k/year for a sponsored forum is kind of irrelevant in the absolute sense, but you're also disillusioned by that.

MM uses black friday as a mechanism to allow a presidential candidate to have an platform on this website, under the guise of "well he's for poker guys!" In effect, 2+2 has become a political arm for a candidate that many reasonable poker players don't care to vote for, regardless of what they think of black friday. Yet, 2+2 is being used as a vehicle to advance the political careers of MM's friends. Which in it of itself, is laughable because 2+2 has publicly, since black friday has **** on PPA, publicly supported iMEGA in favor of PPA, threatened PPA, oh but wait, red mods tell us that PPA can't be happier with 2+2 right now! But yeah I'm the paranoid one for believing that just because GJ doesn't pay for his face to be on 2+2, that everything is ok!

The moment you post PMs from a red mod, you get asked to leave, because they happen to contradict what he's said publicly. When the most respected mod retires because of GJ, I'm paranoid. When red mods repeatedly piss on users in ATF with ultimatums I'm the paranoid one!
aggo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2011, 06:23 PM   #112
Top Dog
 
Mason Malmuth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: @MasonMalmuth
Posts: 8,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by aggo View Post
Although Mason has a cute story of how 2+2 got connected to Gary Johnson, I can't help but think that this was simply a ploy to further monetize 2+2 in the future. I thought it was very distasteful to shove a political candidate onto a online message board where (a) users who create content are paid nothing (b) 2+2 owners probably profit 500k+/year (c) this board traditionally was never polticized. Gary Johnson presented a unique opportunity for 2+2 to become a political arm, and a platform to push political messages to people who are traditionally disaffected by politics. There's no doubt that this was also a test case for the future. Look at how heavily monetized 2+2 is already. If you're a small poker site and you want a sponsored forum on 2+2, prepare to pay tens of thousands for a couple months.
First, why was my story cute? It's exactly what happened.

Second, is there something wrong with increasing the revenue that this site receives? For years we read posts that stated we were doing a poor job of monetizing this site, so I guess your post means we are doing better.

And one other point, would you prefer a subscription model? That's the alternative.

And concerning politics, if 2+2 can make a positive contribution to the passing of a positive Internet poker law, don't you think we should do so? Or would you prefer that we step aside and leave this fight solely up to other sites who don't do such a good job of representing player interests and who would quickly delete a post like yours?

Mason
Mason Malmuth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2011, 06:41 PM   #113
Top Dog
 
Mason Malmuth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: @MasonMalmuth
Posts: 8,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by aggo View Post
You're right that merge skins paying 2+2 somewhere around 80-120k/year for a sponsored forum is kind of irrelevant in the absolute sense, but you're also disillusioned by that.

MM uses black friday as a mechanism to allow a presidential candidate to have an platform on this website, under the guise of "well he's for poker guys!" In effect, 2+2 has become a political arm for a candidate that many reasonable poker players don't care to vote for, regardless of what they think of black friday. Yet, 2+2 is being used as a vehicle to advance the political careers of MM's friends. Which in it of itself, is laughable because 2+2 has publicly, since black friday has **** on PPA, publicly supported iMEGA in favor of PPA, threatened PPA, oh but wait, red mods tell us that PPA can't be happier with 2+2 right now! But yeah I'm the paranoid one for believing that just because GJ doesn't pay for his face to be on 2+2, that everything is ok!

The moment you post PMs from a red mod, you get asked to leave, because they happen to contradict what he's said publicly. When the most respected mod retires because of GJ, I'm paranoid. When red mods repeatedly piss on users in ATF with ultimatums I'm the paranoid one!
First off, what friends are you referring to? I had never even met Governor Johnson until we received the initial phone call in May, and first met him in person when he attended our party in July.

As for IMEGA, we felt they were a good organization that might be able to produce some positive results, and we still feel this way.

As for the PPA, while we feel that they are an important organization, that does't mean we are going to sit idle and watch them screw up things and damage it for all of us.

It's our opinion that this has clearly been the case in the past, but fortunately today, mostly thanks to TheEngineer, they appear to be on the right track. In fact, if this improvement wasn't the case, there would be no PPA Forum on 2+2.

So you see that we are capable of making unpopular decisions if we feel that it is best for poker to do so. It also allows us to act in a completely independent manner. And one other important point, unlike many other organizations in our field, we can take criticism as well as dish it out.

Mason
Mason Malmuth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2011, 07:03 PM   #114
Tiger > Jack
 
loK2thabrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 15,315
Re: Gary Johnson removal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by aggo View Post
You're right that merge skins paying 2+2 somewhere around 80-120k/year for a sponsored forum is kind of irrelevant in the absolute sense, but you're also disillusioned by that.

MM uses black friday as a mechanism to allow a presidential candidate to have an platform on this website, under the guise of "well he's for poker guys!" In effect, 2+2 has become a political arm for a candidate that many reasonable poker players don't care to vote for, regardless of what they think of black friday. Yet, 2+2 is being used as a vehicle to advance the political careers of MM's friends. Which in it of itself, is laughable because 2+2 has publicly, since black friday has **** on PPA, publicly supported iMEGA in favor of PPA, threatened PPA, oh but wait, red mods tell us that PPA can't be happier with 2+2 right now! But yeah I'm the paranoid one for believing that just because GJ doesn't pay for his face to be on 2+2, that everything is ok!

The moment you post PMs from a red mod, you get asked to leave, because they happen to contradict what he's said publicly. When the most respected mod retires because of GJ, I'm paranoid. When red mods repeatedly piss on users in ATF with ultimatums I'm the paranoid one!
Good god, man. Pull yourself together. I've browsed this forum every day since black friday, and have only seen or heard the name Gary Johnson a handful of times.

It's not as if they're flooding our inboxes with spam or something. There's a sticky in all the subforums.

Whoop-de-****ing-doo.
loK2thabrain is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2011, 12:06 AM   #115
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
aggo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: nyc
Posts: 8,137
Re: Gary Johnson removal?

Mason, I deleted that post within seconds of making it.

that's for the record.

but since it has re-appeared, i will respond.


Quote:
Originally Posted by loK2thabrain View Post
Good god, man. Pull yourself together. I've browsed this forum every day since black friday, and have only seen or heard the name Gary Johnson a handful of times.

It's not as if they're flooding our inboxes with spam or something. There's a sticky in all the subforums.

Whoop-de-****ing-doo.
get your facts straight, please.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mason Malmuth View Post
First off, what friends are you referring to? I had never even met Governor Johnson until we received the initial phone call in May, and first met him in person when he attended our party in July.

As for IMEGA, we felt they were a good organization that might be able to produce some positive results, and we still feel this way.

As for the PPA, while we feel that they are an important organization, that does't mean we are going to sit idle and watch them screw up things and damage it for all of us.

It's our opinion that this has clearly been the case in the past, but fortunately today, mostly thanks to TheEngineer, they appear to be on the right track. In fact, if this improvement wasn't the case, there would be no PPA Forum on 2+2.

So you see that we are capable of making unpopular decisions if we feel that it is best for poker to do so. It also allows us to act in a completely independent manner. And one other important point, unlike many other organizations in our field, we can take criticism as well as dish it out.

Mason
So let's get this straight Mason.

When you threatened to remove the PPA from the 2+2, which was many months before black friday, you did so knowing that the PPA represented the only mobilized lobbyist group solely devoted to legitimizing online poker. Daily, there were threads in the PPA forums about how to reach members of congress, what to write, how to donate, legalities concerning online poker, uigea, tax law, tax filing, and generally how to get involved. That was 95% of the content in the PPA forums. Not the background noise about how/why 2+2 (for those who don't know, 2+2 as a business) was unhappy with the PPA. Yet, you're suddenly allowed to claim that you support GJ because it's the righteous thing (for 2+2) to do for poker players?

Then IIRC, shortly or around thereafter, you created a new subforum for iMEGA, who has many other interests than just online poker. And you explicitly supported iMEGA over the PPA for many months with posts on the forums.

Last edited by aggo; 11-28-2011 at 12:27 AM.
aggo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2011, 02:08 AM   #116
Top Dog
 
Mason Malmuth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: @MasonMalmuth
Posts: 8,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by aggo View Post
Mason, I deleted that post within seconds of making it.

that's for the record.

but since it has re-appeared, i will respond.




get your facts straight, please.




So let's get this straight Mason.

When you threatened to remove the PPA from the 2+2, which was many months before black friday, you did so knowing that the PPA represented the only mobilized lobbyist group solely devoted to legitimizing online poker. Daily, there were threads in the PPA forums about how to reach members of congress, what to write, how to donate, legalities concerning online poker, uigea, tax law, tax filing, and generally how to get involved. That was 95% of the content in the PPA forums. Not the background noise about how/why 2+2 (for those who don't know, 2+2 as a business) was unhappy with the PPA. Yet, you're suddenly allowed to claim that you support GJ because it's the righteous thing (for 2+2) to do for poker players?

Then IIRC, shortly or around thereafter, you created a new subforum for iMEGA, who has many other interests than just online poker. And you explicitly supported iMEGA over the PPA for many months with posts on the forums.
We had many reasons to remove the PPA from this website, and my public warning to them was our last attempt at straightening things out. Unknown to you I have had a number of conversations with both D'Amato and Pappas, so they were already well aware of our unhappiness.

Our problems with the PPA go back over five years when we posted a report done by our attorneys addressing some of the initial problems, and there were many including board members whose removal we called for. And by the way, even though the report came at our expense and led to a number of improvements at the PPA, we have never asked for any reimbursement.

Today our attitude is different. We have been working with TheEngineer and only TheEngineer and the results are what you currently see.

As for IMEGA, our support for them was completely independent of the PPA. But behind the scenes we did play a role in encouraging these two organizations to get to know each other better to see where they could be beneficial to each other.

And one final thought since you are so obsessed with Gov Johnson. The PPA has also featured him on their site. Perhaps you should complain to them as well.

MM
Mason Malmuth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2011, 05:14 AM   #117
banned
 
Ce1ska's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: 'MERICA
Posts: 4,605
Re: Gary Johnson removal?

Ce1ska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2011, 05:20 AM   #118
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Jzo19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 6,994
Re: Gary Johnson removal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mason Malmuth View Post
First,

And concerning politics, if 2+2 can make a positive contribution to the passing of a positive Internet poker law, don't you think we should do so? Or would you prefer that we step aside and leave this fight solely up to other sites who don't do such a good job of representing player interests and who would quickly delete a post like yours?

Mason
why not support ron paul ? someone who has a viable chance of winning ..everyone from the start knew johnson was beyond a longshot ..im not sure the reasoning behind this
Jzo19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2011, 06:39 AM   #119
Top Dog
 
Mason Malmuth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: @MasonMalmuth
Posts: 8,044
Re: Gary Johnson removal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jzo19 View Post
why not support ron paul ? someone who has a viable chance of winning ..everyone from the start knew johnson was beyond a longshot ..im not sure the reasoning behind this
1. Ron Paul never contacted us.

2. Paul's foreign policy views would be an issue with me.

I do agree with much of what Paul says concerning the economy and other domestic issues, but his views of foreign policy make it a no go for me.

However, if Congressman Paul, as well as any of the other candidates, wanted to come on here and participate in these forums, he would be welcome to do so. (The only issue is that we would have to confirm that it was really him or an appropriate representative.)

Best wishes,
Mason
Mason Malmuth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2011, 06:56 AM   #120
Master of the Edit Line
 
Doc T River's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Supports Bar, Online, & Home Poker
Posts: 5,999
Re: Gary Johnson removal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by aggo View Post
You're right that merge skins paying 2+2 somewhere around 80-120k/year for a sponsored forum is kind of irrelevant in the absolute sense, but you're also disillusioned by that.

MM uses black friday as a mechanism to allow a presidential candidate to have an platform on this website, under the guise of "well he's for poker guys!" In effect, 2+2 has become a political arm for a candidate that many reasonable poker players don't care to vote for, regardless of what they think of black friday. Yet, 2+2 is being used as a vehicle to advance the political careers of MM's friends. Which in it of itself, is laughable because 2+2 has publicly, since black friday has **** on PPA, publicly supported iMEGA in favor of PPA, threatened PPA, oh but wait, red mods tell us that PPA can't be happier with 2+2 right now! But yeah I'm the paranoid one for believing that just because GJ doesn't pay for his face to be on 2+2, that everything is ok!

The moment you post PMs from a red mod, you get asked to leave, because they happen to contradict what he's said publicly. When the most respected mod retires because of GJ, I'm paranoid. When red mods repeatedly piss on users in ATF with ultimatums I'm the paranoid one!
How has Mason **** on the PPA since Black Friday?
Doc T River is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive