Quote:
Originally Posted by grenzen
I don't have any evidence, I was not part of the private messages, or did not see all of the stuff you were doing. But I did start to see you posting over in the casino side with pictures, comments, stuff that was totally irrelevant.
I have posted the two pictures that I am aware of that were moderated from the casino side. One was showing my approval of another posters comment, and one was in relation to my argument on the ethics side to see how those saying their moral compass prevented them from delaying to win a high hand would feel if that high hand was worth $1 million instead of $500.
I don't recall any other posts in the ethics thread of mine being "totally irrelevant" but please correct me if I'm missing something. I believe I responded and argued my side in that thread, rather than acted the troll.
Quote:
My first thought was what a big fool you are making of yourself. You are doing that again by ostracizing yourself along the lines of those who have been banned in the past. Just like a lot of them, you didn't know when to stop.
I can't disagree that I can be stubborn and dig my heels in, but didn't know when to stop what? Taking the side of an argument that some other posters disliked? I wasn't alone in that thread in taking the side I did regarding the ethics of delaying to qualify for a promo, but it seemed pretty clear my stance on it was separate from how Rapini saw the situation.
My entire post was deleted when I brought up the argument of those from the moral side of the coin, would they delay 30 seconds, 10 seconds, what if the prize was greater than $500, what if it was 10K, 100K, 1 million? Because I added a picture to that post, my entire argument was just deleted, rather than just remove the image. Seems like overmoderation imo, and from a mod who took the opposite view as myself in that thread, so somewhat biased as well to just delete an argument that might present a quandary to some of those claiming the ethical high ground.
Quote:
I don't know what your poll is all about, I'm not voting one way or another if you are banned, exiled, or whatever. You took a completely fun, harmless, non political thread, and decided to ruin it for everybody, and you enjoyed doing it. I haven't seen you in awhile, that's true, and we are starting to get new posters involved. Something we never had when you were in control.
Uh.......are you talking about the clash of clans thread again? If so, how was I "in control"?
Also, I still maintain it was the Poker Degens who initiated the trolling and flaming in that thread, and I eventually grew tired of it and trolled and flamed right back.
Are you saying it's ok for your mob mentality (who has attempted to "own" that clash of clans thread many times in the past) to bash on anyone who doesn't wish to join their clan, but not to suffer the same criticisms in return?
And furthermore, the Aids in that thread was months and months ago, and had died off, certainly from my own posts in that thread when interacting with the Degens. If you treat me with respect, I give it back. If you're an ******* to me, I give that back too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReidLockhart
lol MV wants to use Rapini's past history and body of work against him, but as soon as you bring up MV's body of work, it's off topic. Man this guy sure likes to pick and choose.
Maybe he does deserve the exile.
Rapini's past history is in direct relation to this OP and his moderation of the specific forum in question.
My history in the clash of clans thread, while not 100% irrelevant, is certainly significantly less relevant because:
1. I have one infraction from December of last year from Mike Haven regarding troll posts being unacceptable. I believe it's from the Clash of Clans thread. I have no further infractions received since that time anywhere else, until this issue with Rapini
2. My exile from B&M, to my knowledge, had nothing to do with the war of words that took place months and months ago in the Clash of Clans thread. Rapini wasn't involved in those discussions and to my knowledge wasn't even aware of them.
3. My exile from B&M was, to my knowledge, based specifically on posts within the B&M forum that were moderated vaguely and the punishment (a full exile from B&M) does not fit the crime (hotlinking two images). I was already temp-banned for multiple days from 2+2 entirely already.
4. This thread has already resulted in a new B&M moderator being appointed and a new system requiring consensus from moderators of B&M before posters can be banned. I believe that should show my case to be let back in to B&M has some merit.