level

Can we lock this rubbish up before OP embarrasses himself anymore?

I'll bet a million, but if I happen to lose, you will have to wait for me to earn 2.5 million so I can pay you, I mean it has to be same for both sides, right?

Hahahaha..

Exactly!

Now what OP?

not only does this bet sound stupid, it could be very shady. OP needs to give screen name and history with the game. As well as mutli-tabling ability and experience at stakes + conditions. You could be a reg for all we know.

Op you a knucklehead. Your confidence is coming from running 20 bucks into 200 ? rofl. Cut the bull**** and buyin for more than 10 bucks. what a waste of time this thread was. As stated above this will not end well for u.

how do you do this with 12 bi? guarantee reload more than once

op is giev money

100k by Halloween no doubt

Fought my way back up to (the equivalent of) 10.67 euros, slightly more than the 10 I bought in with.

https://twitter.com/#!/10to00k

So I now have about $13.33, which is:
- 13 bi's @ $1 bi (dangerous low obviously very very high risk-of-ruin)
or
- 133 bi's @ $0.10 tourneys (these I usually place in. I think I currently have sufficient bankroll to be safely playing in these.)

- 668 bi's @ $0.02 tourneys. Unfortunately I've never placed in these hyper-turbo tourneys and I don't know how to do so. This is probably enough bi's for me to learn to do so however... At the moment I'm not playing in these.

[ ] thanks for the update

Part of me wants to believe this is a level but he seems to dedicate so much time to it that OP might actually be real.

Am I the only one who has no idea wtf OP is proposing in terms of payouts for bets? Hes not making any sense or maybe im just as dumb as him?

I think he is no older than 16 years old, I d give him 14. I can relate to his thinking when I was back in high school.

If its not real its one of the most elaborate levels ever.

Um, I'm much older than that. (Without getting too specific). You may be right though as I'm down to 13 bi's. Unlike the other thread I was inspired by ("weeklong prop bet") which didn't seem to consider this - probably due to a total lack of time -, I can consistently place in the $0.10 tourneys and seem to have a bit more time to do them, so if variance gets me as low as Nate got, to around $1.7 or so then I will just do those until I build up. I think he didn't have time to even consider that.

If I do take some bets from winnings and then bust I would seriously consider doing another one but starting at only $2.5 instead of $12.50.

For the people asking how the bets work. e.g. if I make it up to $25 or $30 I would immediately prepay on the $3.5 bet, which gets transferred and disappears from my account (I'm back down to $21.50 or $26.50 respectively).

On reflection if this were a significant amount of money (e.g. $20,000 on a hypothetical bankroll of $50,0000) then if I manage to make from the remaining $30k after prepayment to $80k, then this represents $100k in winnings - $20k used to prepay the bet and which I agree not to play with. You keep it if I go busto off of the other $30k.

If I only get the remaining $30k up to $35k you keep the prepayment and I keep my bankroll, having already prepaid the bet. This seems quite fair to me.

You can say I'm "nuts" for taking the bet, but I'm not really losing any more than the original $12.50 I deposited - and I like to gamble with winnings, roll them into ever more improbable streaks.

Of course this is quite improbable. I fully expect to lose the $12.50 I started this streak with. That's the most I can lose.

Likewise, if I do prepay you $3.5 I fully expect to lose it, but it doesn't add to the $12.50 loss as I pay you off of winnings.

I'll keep you updated on whether I can take even the $3.50 bet, as I'm down to 12-13 bi's. Taking it now would get me down to 9 bi's, which is (obviously) even more dangerous.