the bot program must have only gave a 3000 game trial period. after that he was on his own

umm someone do agext on stars im too retarted. ROI is over -80%.

He's pretty consistent:

How can this be perfectly flat for like 95 games?

maybe some kind of freeroll he kept playing but was making 0 progress lol.

if thats not it then idk, it does seem very strange

look up "nett" on FTP... impressive

Yea this wins the thread for me, I've never seen someone with that bad of an ROI over 500 games. I mean it's like he's actually making a genuine effort to play as bad as he possibly can.

I got confused when it looked like he was getting better since his ROI is so terrible. but quickly realized he was actually just playing $0 SNGs

i think this is my graph, lol.. austinkearns? that's what happens after you kill the 215s n 5s on party and think they are the same thing on stars

winner

Wow at Rookie62, avg. stake is $2. That's incredible.

search mjbarns - about 3400 games averaging $17 buy-in and down over 10k. -17% ROI graph looks like a slide.

Pierrette56 on Ps rocks

more graphs please

any nice ones?

Gotta <3 Rookie62

He saw Gordon doing this once:
PokerStars Game #13397325440: Tournament #67970046, $1.50+$0.25 Hold'em No Limit - Level I (10/20)

RomanR88: raises 80 to 100
Rookie62: calls 100
seanjohnjuan: folds
Diabolik22: raises 3120 to 3220 and is all-in
suckyourcash: folds
acryte87: folds
RomanR88: calls 1400 and is all-in
Rookie62: calls 1390 and is all-in
Board [As 8c 5s Kd 4c]
Seat 1: RomanR88 showed [8d 8h] and won (4530) with three of a kind, Eights
Seat 2: Rookie62 showed [Th Jh] and lost with high card Ace
Seat 4: seanjohnjuan (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: Diabolik22 (small blind) showed [7c 7d] and lost with a pair of Sevens

HE saw Tilly doing this once:

jayfast: calls 20
stillbill1: folds
Swampgirl710: calls 20
Scampi 555: calls 20
Rookie62: calls 10
Bibelbrox: checks
*** FLOP *** [Kd 2h Jd]
Rookie62: checks
Bibelbrox: checks
Giph: bets 100
jayfast: folds
Swampgirl710: folds
Scampi 555: folds
Rookie62: calls 100
Bibelbrox: folds
*** TURN *** [Kd 2h Jd] [Js]
Rookie62: checks
Giph: bets 100
Rookie62: calls 100
*** RIVER *** [Kd 2h Jd Js] [Jh]
Rookie62: bets 20
Giph: calls 20
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Rookie62: shows [Jc Ad] (four of a kind, Jacks)
Giph: mucks hand

Here he managed to reach Level II:

PokerStars Game #13397462938: Tournament #67970515, $1.50+$0.25 Hold'em No Limit - Level II (15/30)
srobinson222: raises 60 to 90
dressel62: calls 90
Rookie62: calls 90
*** FLOP *** [Ad Jc 6h]
srobinson222: bets 120
Rookie62: calls 120
*** TURN *** [Ad Jc 6h] [3h]
srobinson222: bets 600
Rookie62: calls 600
*** RIVER *** [Ad Jc 6h 3h] [Tc]
srobinson222: bets 1490 and is all-in
Rookie62: calls 935 and is all-in
*** SHOW DOWN ***
srobinson222: shows [As Ah] (three of a kind, Aces)
Rookie62: shows [Qh Qd] (a pair of Queens)

lollo this guy needs help srsly (it all happened in the last 10 Minutes. Rookie63 plays 2tables though, as soon as he is busted at one table he opens another fast $1.50 18Players Donkai(!)ment)

AMAZING!

Rookie62: bets 20
Giph: calls 20
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Rookie62: shows [Jc Ad] (four of a kind, Jacks)


zomfg

looks like he even moved down to rebuild, gotta give him credit for that imo

the last one posted is pretty sick too

i like the -e^x ones the best.. is this moving up and playing just as bad or playing progressively worse at same stakes?

People are incapable of posting images?

how about posting some great ones too?

Do any of you know of any really impressive ones, besides Tatta?

nothing but HU PLO8 sng's iirc

Tatta is sick...played HU vs him scoped him almost fell off my chair...almost zero variance. Lost 5 str8 then packed it in....guy is very very good...slow as mollasses though.

too bad this dude isn't on full tilt.
i wanna play him. but i can't stand slow players.

He probably plays 2 or 3 at once and takes his time. that's brutal.

Go to the "Leaderboards" and select "Any Game", "Any Game" and "Total Profit".

livb112 (Poker Stars)



JohnSmiley1 (PokerStars)



THE__D__RY (PokerStars)

Why does everyone get sfconfused by these graphs. The y-axis is going by 2.5k's, if he's playing $6 sng's the swongs aren't going to be shown.