Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Coleman, if Poker is So Evil... Coleman, if Poker is So Evil...

12-01-2014 , 12:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Olaff
Cawlmang positions himself as this wholesome, positive guy who cares deeply about the world, blablabla. He's made enough to live comfortably on and pursue other (less evil) occupations. He's positioned himself as the kind of guy who wouldn't continue doing something evil just for money, especially when he's already well off. Therein... lies the inconsistency of his position?

I run a very successful child paedophile ring, yes I know it's "evil" and I have enough money to retire on, but the sound of Madeline Mcanns tears bring me such joy. Maybe in a way that's why he carries on playing poker, cause when he sucks out on the river, he like's to hear the tears.....

Talking of sucking out, does anyone need a baby sitter?
Coleman, if Poker is So Evil... Quote
12-01-2014 , 03:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by omnishakira
maybe because he's the anti-christ
No that's Obama.
Coleman, if Poker is So Evil... Quote
12-01-2014 , 04:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Olaff
No that's Obama.
I was close
Coleman, if Poker is So Evil... Quote
12-02-2014 , 02:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by omnishakira
I was close
Yes
Coleman, if Poker is So Evil... Quote
12-07-2014 , 11:05 PM
It seems that when Daniel is faced with a serious question that points out his hypocrisy he simply chooses to troll about the way that his last name was spelled. He's a grown man but certainly doesn't act like one. The fact is that Daniel continues to voice his thoughts about the evil that poker causes but continues to make money off of players who aren't as good as him. Either find a new a profession or stop moaning.
Coleman, if Poker is So Evil... Quote
12-08-2014 , 07:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanfold
It seems that when Daniel is faced with a serious question that points out his hypocrisy he simply chooses to troll about the way that his last name was spelled. He's a grown man but certainly doesn't act like one. The fact is that Daniel continues to voice his thoughts about the evil that poker causes but continues to make money off of players who aren't as good as him. Either find a new a profession or stop moaning.
WORD. I think he avoids seriously answering because his actions given his position are indefensible, intellectually dishonest and hypocritical. I mean how can you possibly reconcile the two? He should either quit poker now or stop considering himself a "good person"/"caring about the world"/blablabla. There's no other intellectually honest option. That's why he avoids answering this like a coward. He painted the whole game/sport we love black but refuses to walk the walk. Walk the walk Colman or STFU.

Last edited by Olaff; 12-08-2014 at 07:25 PM.
Coleman, if Poker is So Evil... Quote
12-09-2014 , 12:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Olaff
WORD. I think he avoids seriously answering because his actions given his position are indefensible, intellectually dishonest and hypocritical. I mean how can you possibly reconcile the two? He should either quit poker now or stop considering himself a "good person"/"caring about the world"/blablabla. There's no other intellectually honest option. That's why he avoids answering this like a coward. He painted the whole game/sport we love black but refuses to walk the walk. Walk the walk Colman or STFU.
AGREED
Coleman, if Poker is So Evil... Quote
12-09-2014 , 02:54 AM
What specifically has Colman said/written about poker that you disagree with?
Coleman, if Poker is So Evil... Quote

      
m