Quote:
Originally Posted by I_Poke_4_Fun
book 2k for me for option 2
option 2
imo out of all 3 options i gave, that is the hardest one. are other bettors satisfied if I adjust the rules to option 2, which would exclude 6max and CAP tables.
Reserve List:
JudyIsApunk - 2k
bandonlooper1 - 0.5k
MindGamez - 1k
Pleex - 15k
mrdurdenptp - 1k
borgsex - 1k
mdm13 - 1k
Gorilla Boy - 2k
toony - 1k
d7o1d1s0 - 1.5k
galen - 7k
linzeelowhan - 1k
junkmail3 - 1.5k
I_Poke_4_Fun - 2k
---
total = 37.5k
Quote:
Originally Posted by ach ja
You're surprised that you're not getting much action when Waterfall couldnt get any action at 3-1 for 600k hands at 100NL?
yes, i am very surprised. waterfall is an experienced fullring grinder with 3.6 million hands on pokerstars, who can 24 table fullring tables with a positive winrate. i havent played over 50-60k hands lifetime on fullring at 100nl. im also a slight losing player at fullring not including all the pressure ill be under, playing 14-16 hours per day. 14 hours assuming I can efficiently 24 table fast tables every day for 31 days at all times with no table selection, tables breaking, or breaks themselves. up to date, ive averaged 800-900 hands/hour which seems to be my current comfortablity level.
oh btw, i added 100k hands to the bet. kind of crazy im attempting to profit at a stake im no proven winner at with no experience multi tabling 24 tables at 100nl while attempting to accomplish a world record for most hands ever played in a month....at fullring with option two.
i have no idea why i keep pushing for this because im just going to regret it if it proceeds. my friends have all warned me this is a bad and -ev idea. i just have this weird craving inside of me, i just cant explain it.